|
sex is overrated (pg. 11)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Silky Johnson |
It isn't. I'm just saying that it's a poor choice to use Rosenhan's experiment to support your argument, because Rosenhan himself blew it.
If I misunderstood what you're saying, I apologize - I didn't read the whole thread. :p |
|
|
| kuollutrunkkau5 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Miss Pie
It isn't. I'm just saying that it's a poor choice to use Rosenhan's experiment to support your argument, because Rosenhan himself blew it. |
No, he blew arguably his experiemnt to show that psychiatry was harmful.
I never argued that psychiatry or psychology was harmful, I said it was a pseudo-science, and that, the experiment excellently shows. |
|
|
| david.michael |
So, anyways...
OP is wrong... Sex is awesome and I pity all of you who think otherwise. |
|
|
| kuollutrunkkau5 |
| quote: | Originally posted by david.michael
So, anyways...
OP is wrong... Sex is awesome and I pity all of you who think otherwise. |
You have obviously never peed when you really needed to. |
|
|
| Redd |
| how does peeing make you think sex is less awesome? |
|
|
| kuollutrunkkau5 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Redd
how does peeing make you think sex is less awesome? |
Once you have felt the sensation of having to pee when you really have to, all else pales in comparison. |
|
|
| Redd |
| quote: | Originally posted by kuollutrunkkau5
Once you have felt the sensation of having to pee when you really have to, all else pales in comparison. |
this would make everything but peeing not awesome. correct logic sir? |
|
|
| enydo |
| quote: | Originally posted by kuollutrunkkau5
Once you have felt the sensation of having to pee when you really have to, all else pales in comparison. |
You suck at trolling, face. |
|
|
| kuollutrunkkau5 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Redd
this would make everything but peeing not awesome. correct logic sir? |
WHEN YOU REALLY HAVE TO. |
|
|
| geroin |
| i agree, blowjobs are much better imo :stongue: |
|
|
| kuollutrunkkau5 |
This is why psychology is a pseudoscience by the way.
http://drdouglas.org/drdpdfs/GSA_SIPR(2007).pdf
That some one who has the balls to use the term 'well-defined' and 'scientific' for that ridiculously vague and open to interpretation guideline and call it a definition can still become a respected man in his field.
In physics, such vagueness is simply ignored, if you do not define your terms people will stop and say 'Define what you mean with "Space" in this context before we continue?' until you've broken it down to completely objective rigour that a computer can analyse. |
|
|
|
|
