|
those Hoops girls wear around their head.... (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Halcyon+On+On |
| But if you're taking the 1800s biological textbook/Fledz approach, if a woman makes it to 55 before dying, she has already surpassed her fruitful days and can no longer bear children, so why might her health or appearance matter at that point? If anything, she is saving future children from the debt it takes to facilitate the ensurance of life after 55. Diabetics are quite responsible human beings, really. |
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
But if you're taking the 1800s biological textbook/Fledz approach, if a woman makes it to 55 before dying, she has already surpassed her fruitful days and can no longer bear children, so why might her health or appearance matter at that point? If anything, she is saving future children from the debt it takes to facilitate the ensurance of life after 55. Diabetics are quite responsible human beings, really. |
to be truly responsible we should have a moratorium on having kids at all. but that's another thread :o |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
But if you're taking the 1800s biological textbook/Fledz approach, if a woman makes it to 55 before dying, she has already surpassed her fruitful days and can no longer bear children, so why might her health or appearance matter at that point? If anything, she is saving future children from the debt it takes to facilitate the ensurance of life after 55. Diabetics are quite responsible human beings, really. |
Not really. Diabetes is a costly condition to manage and creates or materially contributes to so many other conditions that can be incredibly costly. If they were being fiscally responsible for their children then they would off themselves once they were no longer earning more then they consume; rather, then allowing themselves to detriorate over an extended (albeit shorter then a person in good health) period of time. Maybe if they sought no treatment for their disease or associated sequale one could argue they are being responsible; however, that is rarely the case. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
to be truly responsible we should have a moratorium on having kids at all. but that's another thread :o |
Can we put that off until my next is born?
Edit: I fully support both you and Hal refraining from procreation... especially Hal |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
Srussell is an eating disorder denier |
I deny an eating disorder being a diagnosable illness in as much as I deny someone going to the Dr. and saying "I'm sad a lot" being diagnosed with a Major Depressive Disorder. |
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Can we put that off until my next is born?
Edit: I fully support both you and Hal refraining from procreation... especially Hal |
might not be a choice for me :/ |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
might not be a choice for me :/ |
You could freeze some swimmers now... not in one of those popsicle molds. |
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
You could freeze some swimmers now... not in one of those popsicle molds. |
yeah i've looked into it, but for the timeframe i'm looking at, ~10 years, it's a hefty sum... and honestly i don't know if it can be done that long
anyway TMI ;) |
|
|
| nefardec |
hahaha
there were an awful lot of headbands at that party. and not just headbands, but feathers stuck in them too. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
I fully support both you and Hal refraining from procreation... especially Hal |
How old's that daughter of yours again? :gsmile: |
|
|
| ziptnf |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
How old's that daughter of yours again? :gsmile: |
Old enough to be sold into slavery, I'm sure! Do I hear $100? |
|
|
|
|
