|
Ontario Provincial Elections 2011 Discussion (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Yohan |
drunk voting ftw. i hope i put the right x in on the ballot.
voted hudak because i don't want another mcguinty govt and hudak has the best shot. anyone but mcguinty for me really |
|
|
| ChemEnhanced |
| I voted for Phil Buck |
|
|
| patpicos |
Hi Julie,
I vote to evict Dalton McGuinty
ooopps this is not big brother .....still voted against the douche. Hudak was my pick |
|
|
| Nick Cenik |
| The LAST thing we need in Ontario is Conservative governments in power at both provincial and federal levels. |
|
|
| Sentinal |
| i hate dalton, my vote went conservative. |
|
|
| Vivid Boy |
| I will jimmy Hoffa the out of Tim Hudak |
|
|
| Yohan |
| looks like a liberal win :( |
|
|
| Yohan |
| this is all your fault GTA! :p |
|
|
| Spam |
| quote: | Originally posted by Yohan
this is all your fault in Hudak! :whip: |
Fix'd.
He made the same mistake as Tory, he failed to differentiate his platform from the Liberal platform, and the promises he DID make were ing stupid. |
|
|
| CMR |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spam
He made the same mistake as Tory, he failed to differentiate his platform from the Liberal platform, and the promises he DID make were ing stupid. |
He made promises? All I saw was "McGuinty taxes!!", "McGuinty bad!!".
Tory's mistake on the other hand was the faith-based schools funding fiasco. |
|
|
| Yohan |
| honestly, the Tories could have put a sock puppet as their party leader and won the election. mind ing boggles how they screw up again! |
|
|
| Spam |
| quote: | Originally posted by CMR
He made promises? All I saw was "McGuinty taxes!!", "McGuinty bad!!".
Tory's mistake on the other hand was the faith-based schools funding fiasco. |
Ya, ankle bracelets for dangerous criminals and dropping the HST from Hydro bills. Oh, and promised changing arbitration rules for public unions so that arbitrators would have to take the community's ability to pay into account while awarding contracts in disputes. But since those provisions already exist, I'm certain the new rules would have been ignored anyway. |
|
|
|
|
