|
TrancEaddict Battle Of The Mixers Volume VI (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| hadi burpee |
| quote: | Originally posted by raaven
I think I finally decided on my tracklisting for the mix I'm going to submit.
teehee
:D :cool: |
post it up! =) |
|
|
| raaven |
| maybe... but i think i'd be better as a surprise ;) |
|
|
| Eugene |
| looks like I missed the DJ one... |
|
|
| hadi burpee |
| quote: | Originally posted by raaven
maybe... but i think i'd be better as a surprise ;) |
hehe only judges get to hear it, so post it anyways =) |
|
|
| raaven |
yes but I don't want to scare anyone or give them any ideas.
I must protect my precious.
:) |
|
|
| hadi burpee |
| quote: | Originally posted by raaven
I must protect my precious.
:) |
hehe good one
btw , judges, check this i thought of this just now and wanted to post it up
i dont think beat matching should be part of scoring. main thing, beat matching should be a given, how i think it should be is
transition harmonics (measuring how well you kept it in sync, you can have it not beat matched and keep it in sync)
transition flow (how well the transition sounded, how well the two songs go together, however you want to say it, as well as leveling)
trackselection (how the mixed flowed as a whole)
thats just what i thought
cuz i think most of us here can beat match with no problem, so how can you get points off for beat matching? |
|
|
| xKaoSx |
| quote: | Originally posted by raaven
yes but I don't want to scare anyone or give them any ideas.
I must protect my precious.
:) |
funny - i used avb - precious |
|
|
| DJCodeBlue |
quite simply, if you cannot beatmatch, you shouldn't be in this competition to begin with; heck, if you cannot beatmatch, and the judges hear it, you should be disqualified
just my 2 cents :p |
|
|
| raaven |
beatmatching? huh??
you mean i actually have to do that?
goddamnit!!!!!
:D |
|
|
| hadi burpee |
| quote: | Originally posted by raaven
beatmatching? huh??
you mean i actually have to do that?
goddamnit!!!!!
:D |
confusing isnt it, hehe =) |
|
|
| Project T |
the mark scheme is being left as it is to remove as much bias as possible.
the beatmatching in this competition does vary a lot, from very good almost and sometimes perfect, and in some cases its quite amateurish. everybody can beatmatch, but if that is what you mean, everybody can eq and pick tracks etc.
basically...
tracklist - how the set flows, how the tracks work together
beatmatching - how well it is kept on beat, corrections, etc.
harmonics - eq work, use of faders, etc.
it works the best this way so far and is as unbiased as it really can get, we dont want a repeat of CMII |
|
|
| hadi burpee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Project T
the mark scheme is being left as it is to remove as much bias as possible.
the beatmatching in this competition does vary a lot, from very good almost and sometimes perfect, and in some cases its quite amateurish. everybody can beatmatch, but if that is what you mean, everybody can eq and pick tracks etc.
basically...
tracklist - how the set flows, how the tracks work together
beatmatching - how well it is kept on beat, corrections, etc.
harmonics - eq work, use of faders, etc.
it works the best this way so far and is as unbiased as it really can get, we dont want a repeat of CMII |
ah ok thanks, i was just confused about how you actually go about judging each section, that is how i did it for the mp3 compo when i judged it, so sounds good to me |
|
|
|
|
