|
are you circumcised? (pg. 29)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| NiteMer |
| quote: | Originally posted by AlphaStarred
...yea i wish |
No you don't. Ask any girl on here. Maybe 1 in 20 would say they wanted that. Most women don't want a ridiculously large member, just large. |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
yea, i was 9 years old. i remember i began to cry because i was scard of surgery, in my mind it was scary of somebody cutting you open, etc. i couldnt pee for many hours cause the blood and stuff blocked the urinary canal, so that was the worst part, and the burning sensation.
the worst burning sensation i ever felt was after i had sergury for appendicitus. excruciating.. |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
Why the hell would you have that surgery at such a late age... :nervous: |
i have no clue, maybe it wasnt necessary until i started having all these infections:nervous: |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
^^^^^
More reason to ban that horrid practice once and for all. |
|
|
| trancebrat |
| I've been with both and being with uncut feels much better. Totally different sensation. :thepirate |
|
|
| Aristronica |
| i'm "uncut" as she put it |
|
|
| goodgreef |
ive known people to get it done later than that, and it was painful for them.. in many ways.
not circumsized just seems to make more sense for me.. in the "suvival" type deal with zippers and silly things all around. from what my ex has told me, i would assume it would be pretty painful due to the sensitivity and stuff. |
|
|
| AlphaStarred |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nou
Why the hell would you have that surgery at such a late age... :nervous: |
my uncle just had surgery last year when he was all of 19. basically you can't shag for about 2 months if i remember.. |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| quote: | Originally posted by AlphaStarred
my uncle just had surgery last year when he was all of 19. |
Why?????
If he thinks its because chicks only like them cut thats just sad...
Someone being forced into doing what is considered mutilation in other countries, due to it being another fad north american doctors decided to start flogging. When in reality it has caused way more problems than it has solved.
It really doesnt matter either way though. In fact, after reading some of the links in this thread, some of the pictures of uncut look weird...I dunno i'm uncut, but mine doesnt look like a freaking scared turtle. |
|
|
| trancebrat |
| quote: | Originally posted by NiteMer
No you don't. Ask any girl on here. Maybe 1 in 20 would say they wanted that. Most women don't want a ridiculously large member, just large. |
This is very true. Unless she is some big amazon woman what is she going to do with 12"? Seriously. It would more than limit the positions that you can do and oral becomes more of a chore than anything else. Deep throat my ass. Any desire for really agressive out of control sex is also limited. Can't exactly bang away with 12" inside of someone without being somewhat cautious of what you're doing. Too small misses out on that (deep) penetration feeling that some women love, but too large takes it to a whole different level...pain. I don't need anyone poking things on my insides. My bladder is just fine where it is. :p
And for those of you that are unaware...once it's erect an uncircumcised one looks the same as a circumcised one. The difference for the woman is that extra skin that you can feel move inside of you. Nice added bonus to an already wonderful sensation. :thepirate |
|
|
| Ian^ |
| quote: | Originally posted by trancebrat
My bladder is just fine where it is. :p
|
s sakes Amber, I'd just bought you a 'move your bladder in 10 easy steps' book for xmas.... now i'll have to find something else :( |
|
|
| trancebrat |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ian^
s sakes Amber, I'd just bought you a 'move your bladder in 10 easy steps' book for xmas.... now i'll have to find something else :( |
Christmas present?! :gsmile: |
|
|
|
|
