|
are you circumcised? (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lephaid |
| quote: | Originally posted by whiskers
actually, that's what i was thinking too.
isn't it a bad idea for a penis to hit against the uterus? it's not pleasant, i thought |
If it's long enough it may bump it, but I'm pretty sure that isn't dangerous. |
|
|
| whiskers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lephaid
If it's long enough it may bump it, but I'm pretty sure that isn't dangerous. |
but does it hurt a lot?
according to ShadoWolf's so anatomically correct picture, it doesn't take a long penis to bump against it
 |
|
|
| whiskers |
better pic:
anyway, since when did this thread turn into a female sexual anatomy thread?
/back to penises |
|
|
| Lephaid |
| quote: | Originally posted by whiskers
but does it hurt a lot?
according to ShadoWolf's so anatomically correct picture, it doesn't take a long penis to bump against it
|
The thing is, vaginas will very readily stretch and expand to accommodate larger objects.
It sometimes hurts a lot the first time because the vagina isn't used to expanding to the size required for the average male, but tends to be okay after that.
Edit: And, usually the g-spot tends to be lower that it seems to be in that lower picture. o.o |
|
|
| DigiNut |
Interesting, I thought the idea that circumcision reduced pleasure was always a myth, but I just looked it up and I'm starting to see a lot of evidence piling up that it's actually true.
In particular I'm a little disturbed by the suggestion that the major religions use it because it reduces the pleasure that comes from whacking off... actually makes perfect sense seeing as how all those religions discourage masturbation, even the ones that encourage sex.
Definitely need to do some more research on this. |
|
|
| Lephaid |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Interesting, I thought the idea that circumcision reduced pleasure was always a myth, but I just looked it up and I'm starting to see a lot of evidence piling up that it's actually true.
In particular I'm a little disturbed by the suggestion that the major religions use it because it reduces the pleasure that comes from whacking off... actually makes perfect sense seeing as how all those religions discourage masturbation, even the ones that encourage sex.
Definitely need to do some more research on this. |
Well, it does remove about 85% of the encapsulated nerve ending in the penis...I'm not sure if that affects pleasure or just sensation, though. |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Interesting, I thought the idea that circumcision reduced pleasure was always a myth, but I just looked it up and I'm starting to see a lot of evidence piling up that it's actually true.
In particular I'm a little disturbed by the suggestion that the major religions use it because it reduces the pleasure that comes from whacking off... actually makes perfect sense seeing as how all those religions discourage masturbation, even the ones that encourage sex.
Definitely need to do some more research on this. |
There's still hope for you
http://www.circumstitions.com/Restore.html |
|
|
| arctic |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Interesting, I thought the idea that circumcision reduced pleasure was always a myth, but I just looked it up and I'm starting to see a lot of evidence piling up that it's actually true.
In particular I'm a little disturbed by the suggestion that the major religions use it because it reduces the pleasure that comes from whacking off... actually makes perfect sense seeing as how all those religions discourage masturbation, even the ones that encourage sex.
Definitely need to do some more research on this. |
Disturbing, but apparently true. From memory, in the Victorian era circumcision was actually advocated and performed because the church thought it would stop people masturbating. No major Australian medical association recommends routine infant circumcision anymore, in fact - most of them advise against the practice.
It's my understanding that uncircumcised people do actually have far greater sensitivity in their pen0rs, as the foreskin is a key component when it comes to sexual pleasure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtm...ch=circumcision is a good place to start if you're interested in it. |
|
|
| DigiNut |
Oh I'm well aware that there are many ways to restore it, and if I ever wanted to do it then fortunately for me I wasn't "totally" cut. But those things take a hell of a lot of time and effort and I'm not about to start doing that unless I'm sure there's a point to it. |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by arctic
It's my understanding that uncircumcised people do actually have far greater sensitivity in their pen0rs, as the foreskin is a key component when it comes to sexual pleasure. |
See, that's what I always heard and it kind of seemed hokey. What made a lot more sense was when I read that it's a different kind of sensation from glans stimulation, that's also pleasurable but doesn't really lead to ejaculation, and technically then prolongs the whole process.
If this is true, then routine circumcision could be largely responsible for a ton of cases of premature ejaculation. |
|
|
| KilldaDJ |
i like my cock.
i dont want no stupid mofo cutting my cock.
so niet...as the russians would say... |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
Just to clear up a misconception..
The Catholic Chuch is totally against circumcision. The Church sees it (rightly) as a form of violence against innocent children. Besides, it's a Jewish (and Muslim) tradition..... :eyes: :disbelief :whip: :thepirate |
|
|
|
|
