|
are you circumcised? (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Boomer187 |
hhmm, for some reason I don't think I am gonna bother reading through all these pages.
Mostly becasue I don't enjoy reading about everyones wang. |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
| quote: | Originally posted by NeoPhono
I think originally circumcision was used by the Jewish religion for cleanliness issues. If you haven't figured it out, the jews are obsessed with cleanliness (not a bad thing, most of the time). If you're circumcised, you probably don't have to deal with something called smegma, which is produced by the glans penis and builds up under the foreskin. If you're circumcised this waxy substance does not accumulate and you don't have to deal with cleaning it.
I think in nature, as said before, the foreskin is to protect both the head of the penis as well as the urethral opening. Since most of us wear something called clothing now a days, it's not really an issue. Besides, also as said before, since 99.9% of the penises seen in porn and the media are circumcised, and American girl would be a little shocked to see an uncircumcised penis, at least in the US.
I think the health and hygene issues outweigh any percieved loss in sensitivity. Since I have not had a foreskin since birth, and since I assure you I am still able to have an orgasm, I do not miss something I've never had. Besides, if you're practicing safe sex, you have to pull the foreskin back anyway, so it really wouldn't do you much good anyhow. |
yeah... and now we have showers. Use one.
Is it really so hard to clean your dick? geez... :whip: |
|
|
| TranceSpeeder |
| wanna know if while maybe, gettin a blow job, girls might like a circumcised wang better. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| quote: | Originally posted by whiskers
some women don't have a g-spot or it may not be overly sensitive, but it does exist. |
there is no spoon... err i mean g-spot:p
and congrats guys, this thread i thought for sure was going to be hijacked and it hasnt A+! |
|
|
| Emil |
| quote: | Originally posted by starglider
Where did I say you were wrong? You were right, of course. I simply said your condition was worthless, which it was. Since phimosis involves the foreskin and circumcized individuals have no foreskin then obviously they are less likely to develop the condition. That's like saying "men are more likely than women to develop prostate cancer". |
| quote: | Originally posted by Emil
Where in the blue hell in my original post am I wrong? Maybe you guys have selective reading? Let me try again: IF YOU ARE NOT CIRCUMCISED YOU ARE MORE likely to DEVELOP PHIMOSIS. |
Oh my god. Are you paying attention to what I am saying? I AM SAYING IF YOU ARE NOT CIRCUMCIZED YOU HAVE A LIKELY CHANCE OF DEVELOPING PHIMOSIS. I don't get why you keep on arguing my point back to me? :conf: |
|
|
| Lephaid |
| quote: | Originally posted by Emil
Oh my god. Are you paying attention to what I am saying? I AM SAYING IF YOU ARE NOT CIRCUMCIZED YOU HAVE A LIKELY CHANCE OF DEVELOPING PHIMOSIS. I don't get why you keep on arguing my point back to me? :conf: |
An unlikely chance of getting phimosis.
And aside from that, it's not always a negative thing.
Aside from that, if you do have phimosis and want to get circumcised for it, you can always do it later. |
|
|
| Emil |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lephaid
An unlikely chance of getting phimosis.
And aside from that, it's not always a negative thing.
Aside from that, if you do have phimosis and want to get circumcised for it, you can always do it later. |
So you are saying if you are NOT circumcized, your chances of developing phimosis is small? |
|
|
| NeoPhono |
| The bottom line is that I've still to see anything that would convince me that being uncircumcised is a good thing. I can only find reasons why being uncircumcised is a bad thing. Again, the only thing I can think of is that it increases sensitivity, but since I was pratically born without a foreskin, it's something I'm not missing since I've never known life with it. And I'd love to see some evidence that circumcised men either enjoy sex or masturbation less. I just see no condition in which having a foreskin is a good thing. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by Emil
So you are saying if you are NOT circumcized, your chances of developing phimosis is small? |
Yes, they're very low:
http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues...pi10278_fm.html
It's a highly overdiagnosed condition, and it isn't even diagnosed that often. |
|
|
| Tranceporter99 |
| quote: | Originally posted by ShadoWolf
as to southern girls...
...let em spend a night with me and then ask again. :thepirate :thepirate :thepirate |
ill make sure and do that. i dont think girls where im from have ever heard of it not being the way it is. plus ive never seen a porno where a guy hasnt. |
|
|
| anuneventrade |
| quote: | Originally posted by Miss Bliss
i like circumcized
the g-spot is bull :mad:
work the clit, boys
that is all :tongue3 |
Okay, maybe you don't have a g-spot. Don't speak for all women though... :) |
|
|
| DjTiberius |
yup
since day one |
|
|
|
|
