return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 
Andy Moor (pg. 8)
View this Thread in Original format
RickyM
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis86
Some of us just have high standards I guess.


Hmmm...its probably due to the fact that I don't DJ and have not too much of an interest in it yet, I prefer producing. I wouldn't say I have low standards, I can appreciate a good DJ, It just isn't top of my list to analyse the DJ's skill whenever I go out. It's all about the music for me.
Clovis86
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
Hmmm...its probably due to the fact that I don't DJ and have not too much of an interest in it yet, I prefer producing. I wouldn't say I have low standards, I can appreciate a good DJ, It just isn't top of my list to analyse the DJ's skill whenever I go out. It's all about the music for me.


Your point sense also, but I just think that a DJ I am paying good money to see should be up to par. If a guy is playing good tracks but ing up all over the place or making quick, boring, ty transitions, it ruins it for me. Especially considering how many bedroom DJs are technically very very good, and have similar if not better track selecting skills.

I just feel that if I'm paying to see one of the big guys, its their job to impress me, not to half ass it.
RickyM
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis86
Your point sense also, but I just think that a DJ I am paying good money to see should be up to par. If a guy is playing good tracks but ing up all over the place or making quick, boring, ty transitions, it ruins it for me. Especially considering how many bedroom DJs are technically very very good, and have similar if not better track selecting skills.

I just feel that if I'm paying to see one of the big guys, its their job to impress me, not to half ass it.


Yeah obviously there is a standard that must be reached, the guy must be able to mix 2 tracks together without ing up all over the place, and be able to beatmatch.
I see your point though too, as a DJ yourself, then obviously you are going to notice the skills of a DJ more than someone like me with no experience in it.
Clovis86
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
Yeah obviously there is a standard that must be reached, the guy must be able to mix 2 tracks together without ing up all over the place, and be able to beatmatch.
I see your point though too, as a DJ yourself, then obviously you are going to notice the skills of a DJ more than someone like me with no experience in it.


Yeah, its weird with non dj friends cause I'm just used to listening so carefully that I catch even small slips...that my friends never notice. So I'm going "ehhhh...put it back!" and they're like "What?"

:toothless


Then I see someone like John Digweed beatmatch better than ableton and I'm just like :eyespop:
*InVeRs3*
quote:
Originally posted by DJ RJT
You're making an argument of "Who cares?" when clearly, there are those of us who do in fact care.

Essentially you're making the claim that what a DJ plays, how he plays it, and and his abilities are irrelevant as long as he makes his audience dance. And while this may be sufficient for you, for those of us who do genuinely care about DJ'ing as an art that extends far beyond your simple "collage" analogy it simply does not. Your argument fails to make room for innovation, and essentially levels the playing field for DJ's equating the skills of guys like DJ Sammy and james Holden, which I think most people would agree is a fallacy.


I can totally see where you're comming from.

I see a good DJ as someone who plays good tunes that rock the crowd even if he's playing the worst song that's ever been made.

You see a good DJ as someone who not only rocks the crowd with great tunes, but is also skillfull in the nuances (mixing, pacing, unique tracks and all that jazz) in the art of DJing.

This argument is just going to turn into this: What makes a good DJ? So let's agree to disagree.

I'll just say this:


You see people with who's attitude I'm arguing for are encouraging DJs and producers to play and produce the same boring overdone $hit. While I do agree, I also think it's important to dance. If a DJ plays DJ Sammy - Boys of Summer, a song that I despise and hate, and if the majority of the crowd is just rocking out to it then I'll feed off that energy and dance to it too. The DJ read the crowd and gave them what they wanted.

Dance music was originally made for people to dance to. If the people dance to it, then the song has done what it was made for.

Tiesto and DJ Sammy are good DJs since people enjoy DANCING to what they play. This is comming from a person who doesn't like DJ Sammy's music or Tiesto's music.
Numidia
quote:
Originally posted by *InVeRs3*
Over intellectualizing DJ sets is stupid. Yes, it's an art, but like someone said before, DJing is as much of an art as making a collage.

And if some DJ throws down a DJ Sammy song and it rocks the crowd, some TAs will call that DJ $hitty. Who ing cares. If the majority like what that DJ plays that's all that matters.

If a DJ's mixing is suspect, who cares? If it's still danceable, that's all that matters. No one will dance to horses gallopping.

Remember, DJs play for people who dance, not only those who like post-modern-minimalist-electronic-music.

It's DJing for Christsakes. I can totally understand why you'd complain about a hip hop turntablist, but you guys are going too deep into 4 on the floor music.


You're the classic mindless dj worshipper. All hype... no substance. All that matters to you is what dj is popular, not whether they actually deserve their popularity or whether they are good. Please think a little more critically.
*InVeRs3*
quote:
Originally posted by Numidia
You're the classic mindless dj worshipper. All hype... no substance. All that matters to you is what dj is popular, not whether they actually deserve their popularity or whether they are good. Please think a little more critically.


I'm no DJ worshipper at all. Would a DJ worshipper compare DJing to a 3rd grader making a collage?
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by DOOMBOT
I didnt go through any trouble, trust me. If I was serious in what I was typing I would have named specific genres to make your dumb ass happy. Instead, your mind is boggled by the list of music I wrote out and you STILL continue to remark about it. Go you, you winner you!!!!!!!


No, you're too ing stupid to know half of the sub-genres you listen to, else you would have listed them, just as you tried to do with rock and by seperating psy and goa from trance. You were trying to big up your tastes. Why even deny what you clearly wrote?
Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
No, you're too ing stupid to know half of the sub-genres you listen to, else you would have listed them, just as you tried to do with rock and by seperating psy and goa from trance. You were trying to big up your tastes. Why even deny what you clearly wrote?

Why do you bother, really?
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Why do you bother, really?


The same reason why you make deadpan replies to obvious stupidity.

Mr.Mystery
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
The same reason why you make deadpan replies to obvious stupidity.

Fair enough. Carry on.
jcastro22
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clovis86
Yeah, its weird with non dj friends cause I'm just used to listening so carefully that I catch even small slips...that my friends never notice. So I'm going "ehhhh...put it back!" and they're like "What?"

:toothless

yup.. sometimes i wish i didn't know any better. most of my friends dj too, so we'll all kind of look at each other with that look on our faces, like eek.. ya know? :eek:
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 
Privacy Statement