|
do you consider pornstars to be prostitutes? (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by all-nite-freak
I saw the pics of your needle dick, they are all faking moans:p |
:o
it's the angle! i swear! |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marc Summers
Isn't pornography art? |
The difference between pornography and art is difficult to assess and constantly in flux. Generally, erotic art is considered non-offencive to prevailing societal values, pornography is considered offencive to prevailing societal values. Which is why you can show a woman getting an eel put into her ass but you have to block out the pubic hair in Japan... apparently taking aquatic life into one's ass is alright but hair is offencive to the Japanese. |
|
|
| Caela |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
jk, I don't think you're a whore... well, I kinda do but not because you've posed nude. |
:rolleyes:
and nudity does not imply porn. it's all about the manner and context of the nudity.
the female body is beautiful. if someone wants to capture that with a camera, it is certainly not always 'pornography': example
example 2
however, if one throws in a suggestive element to a nudity shot, like this
it becomes less artistic and more trashy...hence what 'porn' is. |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
and fyi mark, the camera man doesn't usually say . The "actors" are given orders of positions and all details before. The only thing ever said during a scene is,"go,stop,hair(for when its in the way), and say the same for pretty much any body part in the way. That Seymour Buts show is misleading.Oh yeah he'll say when its money shot time too.
Ceala, if you paint a flower on a dildo and stick it up her ass...art or porn? |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by all-nite-freak
and fyi mark, the camera man doesn't usually say . The "actors" are given orders of positions and all details before. The only thing ever said during a scene is,"go,stop,hair(for when its in the way), and say the same for pretty much any body part in the way. That Seymour Buts show is misleading.
Ceala, if you paint a flower on a dildo and stick it up her ass...art or porn? |
In a lot of "Reality" porns the camera man always talk. The camera man for the bang bus videos is always laughing like a **** while the chick is getting railed. It's lame. |
|
|
| squirrelly |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
as I pointed out earlier... the porn actress/actor is getting paid for the film of them having sex, not the sex itself... if there were no cameras present there would be no cheques. |
and if there were no check, they wouldn't do it.
so...
they're getting paid for sex.
and seriously? All your talk about "experienced women" is gross. I'm sorry, I am NOT interested in anyone who half my town has ed. Disgusting.
someone who has had few partners > someone who's a whore [male/female] |
|
|
| mezzir |
| quote: | Originally posted by Caela
:rolleyes:
and nudity does not imply porn. it's all about the manner and context of the nudity.
the female body is beautiful. if someone wants to capture that with a camera, it is certainly not always 'pornography': example
example 2
however, if one throws in a suggestive element to a nudity shot, like this
it becomes less artistic and more trashy...hence what 'porn' is. |
well idk about the first site, but yeah, the second one (domai) is specifically created for artistic female nudes
its leaning more towards erotica i think |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
| quote: | Originally posted by Marc Summers
In a lot of "Reality" porns the camera man always talk. The camera man for the bang bus videos is always laughing like a **** while the chick is getting railed. It's lame. |
all part of the gimmick to make it look home made, hence "reality"..reality is just a marketing gimmick..trust me most of the time its the same as all the rest;) |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by squirrelly
and if there were no check, they wouldn't do it.
so...
they're getting paid for sex.
and seriously? All your talk about "experienced women" is gross. I'm sorry, I am NOT interested in anyone who half my town has ed. Disgusting.
someone who has had few partners > someone who's a whore [male/female] |
a) again, no, they're getting paid for someone being allowed to film and sell the act. It's like professional sports... a baseball player isn't paid to play baseball... he's paid so that someone else can sell the ability to watch the game. If there were no audience there would be no money.... there may or may not still be a game but there would be no payments made.
b) I'm not the one talking about experienced women.
c) you're a prude |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
| the medium IS the message. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
The difference between pornography and art is difficult to assess and constantly in flux. Generally, erotic art is considered non-offencive to prevailing societal values, pornography is considered offencive to prevailing societal values. Which is why you can show a woman getting an eel put into her ass but you have to block out the pubic hair in Japan... apparently taking aquatic life into one's ass is alright but hair is offencive to the Japanese. |
so shave off the pubic hair and its non-offensive? :) |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
so shave off the pubic hair and its non-offensive? :) |
You'd have to ask the Japanese... these are their standards not mine. Personally I have no problem with pubic hair... putting an eel in someone's ass on the otherhand, not my thing. |
|
|
|
|
