Exploration of Sound ( to all producers ) (pg. 26)
|
View this Thread in Original format
State of Matter |
Its the pro 53, not 52, the 52 is its predecessor and doesn't have the same clean sound.
Yeah I use it inside of FL Studio. |
|
|
Joi Lamusic |
Oh, now I see.. Sorry about that pro 52 thing , don't really know why I didn't see the difference between 52 & 53 :eyespop: |
|
|
Mr.Mystery |
quote: | Originally posted by State of Matter
Mr. Mystery why don't you seem to approve of anything I do (you've answered everything i've said with something negative/condescending)? Anyways, what do you mean by software sound?
|
Er... what? I don't even know who you are.
Is it so freaking hard to realise that when I comment on something it's not a personal attack against you? Do you really think I'd waste my time listening to something only because I wanna be an and post negative feedback without any reason? Are we ever going to progress anywhere if all we get is praise?
The software sound is something I can't quite put my finger on. Maybe it's because the elements don't have enough fx or something, it just doesn't sound as "warm" as the original. Or maybe it needed a different kind of pad. I don't know what you did to the update because I can't listen to it right now but I'm guessing this surrounding pad you added is going to fix at least some of it. |
|
|
State of Matter |
Woah, calm down, I wasn't considering them personal attacks, I was more commenting on your general demeanor. And of course Im not counting on praise all the time, I want feedback more than anything so I can continue to improve. But from the general tone of your messages all I ever seem to feel is negativity. Maybe its the lack of elaboration. The best way to give constructive criticism is to start off with a positive and then follow up with the negatives or vice versa like:
That sounds pretty good, but there's still some software sound to it.
or
It still sounds like it was made with software. It sounds pretty good though, keep working on it.
Showing encouragement as well as criticism makes it seem like you are actually trying to help and not just spouting off negative comments. That's all I'm saying.
About the loop yeah I didnt spend nearly as much time as DT8 and Koglin probably did when they arranged and mastered the elements, I was going for the lead sound and then just loaded up some presets I made before to complete it. |
|
|
dj.unni |
hi! :)
i've done some strings... (rank1 airwave)
click here
it's done with reason(malstr�m) :rolleyes: |
|
|
TiksA |
Wow what an amazing thread! You guys are champs.
I seem to learn better with hands on and being new i'm not very good with names of effects and other settings, so could any of you guys post flp files for FL Studio so i can see what u really mean...
:) |
|
|
Trance Fission |
dj. unni,
those strings sound awesome! |
|
|
dbl |
sounds like a nice start unni, but it's too noisy.
need's some more work |
|
|
BumpinTitaniums |
unni how did you do that? I am messing around with reason but am having no luck with getting anything neat out of Malstrom... |
|
|
Cryogenic |
quote: | Originally posted by BumpinTitaniums
unni how did you do that? I am messing around with reason but am having no luck with getting anything neat out of Malstrom... |
What excalty are you trying to do ?
Ill try to help out. |
|
|
szuchy |
So would it be premature to say that VAZ modular and spectrasonics atmosphere/trilogy are the answer to the original question this thread asked (how to get phat sounds form software)? Or is the Virus/JP8000/x hardware synth still consistently better in some department? |
|
|
Veverka |
quote: | Originally posted by szuchy
So would it be premature to say that VAZ modular and spectrasonics atmosphere/trilogy are the answer to the original question this thread asked (how to get phat sounds form software)? Or is the Virus/JP8000/x hardware synth still consistently better in some department? |
Maybe you'll find it out when you try to program your own sounds with one of those spectrasonics synths? |
|
|
|
|