|
On the Trance Listener (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| IntoTrance |
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradox Lost
I would imagine that my points and requests are quite apparent, but here's the nuts and bolts:
I made some arguments- you remarked upon them, but didn't actually respond to the points that were made.
You claim to have 'dismantled' System-J's arguments, despite being silent upon his having laid them out fully. I'm not saying you need to respond, but it would certainly add some credibility to your purported 'dismantling.'
You also produce an across the board accusation concerning a stated lack of constructive arguments that have come your way, but there are a number of them that are certainly worth mentioning, which makes your reactions throughout the past couple of pages somewhat curious. |
I have dismantled them via Socratic Method, the final word is dependent on his response.
Although his response can only go in one direction: the direction in which my questions have directed him. It is inevitable. |
|
|
| IntoTrance |
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradox Lost
I guess you missed this? |
This response is full of assumptions and rationalization in the evidence of some type of innate idea or connection between certain concepts.
I find it irrelevent and it does not refute my stance. |
|
|
| ToxicGreenWaste |
| quote: | Originally posted by IntoTrance
I have dismantled them via Socratic Method, |
TA does not support witchcraft. |
|
|
| Paradox Lost |
| quote: | Originally posted by IntoTrance
This response is full of assumptions and rationalization in the evidence of some type of innate idea or connection between certain concepts.
I find it irrelevent and it does not refute my stance. |
Oh, so you thought it was appropriate form to simply neglect responding to his argument whilst maintaining the correctness of your own, only to mention this upon reference to your curious silence in light of his response?
Or, did you just realize that he made this argument, and are now finally coming to terms with it.
Either way, all you have produced is a conclusion that exists independent of substantiation, which does not exactly bode well for your arguments. |
|
|
| IntoTrance |
| quote: | Originally posted by ToxicGreenWaste
TA does not support witchcraft. |
Witchcraft? You prove your ignorance at every turn. It would be to your benefit to silence yourself unless you have anything relevent and significant to add.
I'll take a Pagan's ancient philosophy over sheer ignorance and stupidty any day of the week. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| :stongue: |
|
|
| IntoTrance |
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradox Lost
Oh, so you thought it was appropriate form to simply neglect responding to his argument whilst maintaining the correctness of your own, only to mention this upon reference to your curious silence in light of his response?
Or, did you just realize that he made this argument, and are now finally coming to terms with it.
Either way, all you have produced is a conclusion that exists independent of substantiation, which does not exactly bode well for your arguments. |
I have responded the way I have because I have only now read it. I returned from the bars and time with my friends to find 30+ posts on my own original.
I am only human. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| quote: | Originally posted by IntoTrance
relevent...stupidty |
|
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by IntoTrance
I have dismantled them via Socratic Method, the final word is dependent on his response.
Although his response can only go in one direction: the direction in which my questions have directed him. It is inevitable. |
How much time do you think until your Socratic Method is operating at full capacity?
I was about to call it a night, but you make it sound so exciting. |
|
|
| IntoTrance |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
How much time do you think until your Socratic Method is operating at full capacity?
I was about to call it a night, but you make it sound so exciting. |
I'd equate it to a snowball rolling down a mountain. Once it gets started, it quickly picks up its own pace.
Once your "arguers" develop and establish their own arguments (albeit extremely weak, and very easy to refute, in this case) .. the ball keeps rolling. It is not difficult if you've studied it, and, as a matter of fact, is quite entertaining. |
|
|
| MrJiveBoJingles |
| quote: | Originally posted by IntoTrance
I'd equate it to a snowball rolling down a mountain. Once it gets started, it quickly picks up its own pace.
Once your "arguers" develop and establish their own arguments (albeit extremely weak, and very easy to refute, in this case) .. the ball keeps rolling. It is not difficult if you've studied it, and, as a matter of fact, is quite entertaining. |
Poop. |
|
|
|
|
