return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Torq or Serato? (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
sterilis
quote:
Originally posted by djkoolaide
No, in your crates, there is a column that displays the BPM.


ah great. thanks. why doesnt manual tell you this or have misread it.
DjWoody
quote:
Originally posted by sterilis
anyone know why serato bpms all my tracks over 140 as say a track at 140 as 70 or a track at 142 as 71?

is there a way to manually correct them?

cheers


When building your overviews, select a range that's the closest to your tracks. For instance, if all your tracks are EDM, I would select my range to be 88-175. Than all your tracks will be BPM'd correctly. You can BPM tracks individually or in batches. I BPM my hip hop tracks at a much smaller range 68-135, and my rock tracks at a higher range 98-195.

You can always rebuild the overviews to erase the old bpm's and get the new ones. That way you don't have to do the math.

:toothless
archaudio
I use Virtual DJ and i have no problems at all. I love the program.
orTofønChiLd
traktor scratch and numark virtual vinyl are best ones

traktor leads in quality while numark owns in latency (zero latency feature)
djkoolaide
quote:
Originally posted by orTofønChiLd
traktor scratch and numark virtual vinyl are best ones

traktor leads in quality while numark owns in latency (zero latency feature)


fail.
Jeremy H
zero latency is _impossible_.
archaudio
Anybody else besides myself use Virtual DJ?
miamitranceman
quote:
Originally posted by archaudio
Anybody else besides myself use Virtual DJ?


I used to use it a few years ago with a mouse and keyboard before I bought my cdjs and mixer. I taught myself a ot on it in terms of the basics of mixing (beatmatching, phrasing, eqing) and it was a pretty simple transition to hardware.

I've since added Torq to the equation.
L.A.
I use Torq, it works great and it is very simple to use, never had a problem with it, and although I'm not a pro, I know professional DJs from my country who also use Torq.
Since I never used Serato, I'm not in position of giving you an opinion about which is better.
archaudio
quote:
Originally posted by miamitranceman
I used to use it a few years ago with a mouse and keyboard before I bought my cdjs and mixer. I taught myself a ot on it in terms of the basics of mixing (beatmatching, phrasing, eqing) and it was a pretty simple transition to hardware.

I've since added Torq to the equation.


Awesome. I know that the VDJ program does a lot and i wouldn't mind having 2CDJS and a Mixer but i don't have the money to make the transition yet. I do have a Behringer BCD 2000. It's a mp3 controler that i have mapped to VDJ. At first it crashed when i was setting it up, however after i got it configured it is great. I don't have to touch the mouse or keyboard at all. I noticed that my mixeing is a lot better too since i got it.

orTofønChiLd
quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy H
zero latency is _impossible_.


yeah i didn't believe it myself. The signal has to go through analog to digital and back analog, which is what a DAC does, in less than a milisecond. impressive if you ask me.

www.djdeals.com

check out the features on the numark vinyl system
miamitranceman
quote:
Originally posted by archaudio
Awesome. I know that the VDJ program does a lot and i wouldn't mind having 2CDJS and a Mixer but i don't have the money to make the transition yet. I do have a Behringer BCD 2000. It's a mp3 controler that i have mapped to VDJ. At first it crashed when i was setting it up, however after i got it configured it is great. I don't have to touch the mouse or keyboard at all. I noticed that my mixeing is a lot better too since i got it.



Sweet. Enjoy what you have in the meantime! :)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Privacy Statement