|
December 21st 2012... (pg. 10)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Light The Fuse |
| i blame scott bateman |
|
|
| stipsy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Light The Fuse
i blame scott bateman |
i concur...
you bateman xo |
|
|
| sunrise3500 |
| quote: | Originally posted by sunrise3500
come to the end of the worldenium party dammit! :( |
| quote: | Originally posted by Light The Fuse
i blame scott bateman |
up for doing a krusty comeback special set? |
|
|
| Lister Cooray |
| quote: | Originally posted by Philby
the universe is around 6000 years old.
:D |
lovely article philbs....:stongue:
I wonder where the other 14 billion years went? |
|
|
| sunrise3500 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lister Cooray
lovely article philbs....:stongue:
I wonder where the other 14 billion years went? |
Heard of a Delorean? |
|
|
| Light The Fuse |
| quote: | Originally posted by sunrise3500
up for doing a krusty comeback special set? |
always |
|
|
| sunrise3500 |
ps here's the REAL story of how we're here, and it's actually SCIEN... well not scientific, but science fiction..
(Note, people do actually believe this.. and these are REAL beliefs)
http://www.xenu.net/archive/leaflet/xenuleaf.htm
|
|
|
| batemanscott |
lol!
about friggin time TA had some interesting discussion ;)
In my own personal view i do believe in evolution but i think the beginning of things was an act of god.
I think the problem is man made religion - people have been forced to either accept the whole 6000 years old, made in 7 days, adam and eve thing OR science when imo science/evolution is god's handy work.
Imagine for a moment there is a god and he did kick things off but for the last 2000 years generation after generation has been force fed a particular religion's view of how it all came to be and that view is nothing like the truth.
What if for the last 2000 years we had been told that god created a universe billions of years ago that had the ability to grow and change as it needed, would it not align more with what we know today? Keep in mind there is nothing to PROVE this didn't happen.
Break the concept of evolution down and you have some amazing and mysterious works at play that science can't explain. What tells all these tiny little cells and DNA to change (and often quite significantly)in animals over time - how do they know how to change? We have some great theories but that's all they are.
PKC the other thing i would suggest you look at that challenges skeptics is crop circles. Some (very basic ones) have been proven to be faked however 90% defy possibility yet are there to be seen. The doug and dave explanation has also been proven false to ;)
Scientists are yet to work out how it could be possible. Many of the fields are canola which is similar in flexibility to celery, bend it more than 45 degrees and it snaps yet it is bent at a 90 degree angle in these circles.
Tests on the crops affected have showed it grows to almost twice the hieght and yield of crops around it that is not affected, none of it is damaged! They emit recordable sound and the patterns often represent some of the most complex mathematical equations known to man.
We are talking about extremely advanced and intricate patterns twice the size of the MCG appearing over night in crops under surveillance with no witnesses.
Look at the pyramids - every single scientific theory as to how 'we' did it has been proven impossible yet there they are.
And back to the mayans and the sumarians etc, as i keep saying forget the 'prophecy' stuff but have a look at the facts - everything you read will acknowledge they had a better measure of time and the calendar then we do today. Add to this they left detailed diagrams of planets and the solar system we have only just discovered. how did they do it?
I think scepticism is healthy and to a large degree neccessary but surely even a tasmanian like you gets to a point where you stop raping small boys and think that just maybe there is something pretty big at work here :) |
|
|
| sunrise3500 |
| quote: | Originally posted by batemanscott
What tells all these tiny little cells and DNA to change (and often quite significantly)in animals over time - how do they know how to change? We have some great theories but that's all they are. |
I think it's a bit more beyond just theories on this.
Random errors during meiosis. Sometimes beneficial, sometimes not. If it is beneficial, the unf factor should be greater, and then it's passed along to offspring, and hello evolution.
| quote: | Originally posted by batemanscott
Look at the pyramids - every single scientific theory as to how 'we' did it has been proven impossible yet there they are. |
People have moved around rocks of similiar size using techniques which would've been used by the egyptians - and technology available at the time.
Nothing out of this planet. Just an amazing feat of engineering, man power and time. (and a lot of dead people in this process to unfortunately). |
|
|
| batemanscott |
| quote: | Originally posted by sunrise3500
I think it's a bit more beyond just theories on this.
Random errors during meiosis. Sometimes beneficial, sometimes not. If it is beneficial, the unf factor should be greater, and then it's passed along to offspring, and hello evolution.
People have moved around rocks of similiar size using techniques which would've been used by the egyptians - and technology available at the time.
Nothing out of this planet. Just an amazing feat of engineering, man power and time. (and a lot of dead people in this process to unfortunately). |
Not true, the rocks are cut with such precision for one, their wasn't enough date trees in egypt or close by (also a source of food at the time) to support the log roller theory, the ramp theory also false - the ramp would have been bigger and used more rock than the pyrmids themselves.
Rate of sinkage, aligment to true north, aligment to the orion belt, 'tuned' stones, lack of heiroglyphical documentation of them building it, built with the knowledge of pi to 15 decimal points, magnetism produced by the stones etc etc etc the list is endless as to why it wasn't us that could of done it.
We have proved we could move rocks that size - we failed to prove we could build these things based on all we know about them. |
|
|
| batemanscott |
| quote: | Originally posted by sunrise3500
I think it's a bit more beyond just theories on this.
Random errors during meiosis. Sometimes beneficial, sometimes not. If it is beneficial, the unf factor should be greater, and then it's passed along to offspring, and hello evolution.
|
So you're seriously telling me 'random erros' in meiosos are responsible for the vast and extremely vital changes species go through over time to give them a better chance at survival?
farking LOL. i find religion easier to believe than that and i truly dont believe in religion. |
|
|
| sunrise3500 |
| quote: | Originally posted by batemanscott
Not true, the rocks are cut with such precision for one, their wasn't enough date trees in egypt or close by (also a source of food at the time) to support the log roller theory, the ramp theory also false - the ramp would have been bigger and used more rock than the pyrmids themselves.
Rate of sinkage, aligment to true north, aligment to the orion belt, 'tuned' stones, lack of heiroglyphical documentation of them building it, built with the knowledge of pi to 15 decimal points, magnetism produced by the stones etc etc etc the list is endless as to why it wasn't us that could of done it.
We have proved we could move rocks that size - we failed to prove we could build these things based on all we know about them. |
There's evidence to suggest that rocks (atleast the ones higher up in the pyramids) weren't quarried but cast (ie concrete). Easy to get a shape as perfect as you like :)
Never heard anything about the stones having a magnetic field.
The rest is just having smarts and time. |
|
|
|
|
