|
December 21st 2012... (pg. 23)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by MiSSyM
Ever heard of Lourdes? Fatima? Medjugorje?
The list goes on & on.
AND ofcourse not every Scientist believes that.......just many dismiss miracles/apparations as hoaxes (which some maybe are as some have been found to be false-with people just wanting attention) HOWEVER there are real cases, I believe anyways!
;) |
| quote: |
The apparitions of Our Lady of Lourdes began on 11 February 1858, when Bernadette Soubirous, a 14-year old peasant girl from Lourdes admitted, when questioned by her mother, that she had seen a "lady" in the cave of Massabielle, about a mile from the town, while she was gathering firewood with her sister and a friend.[1] Similar appearances of the "lady" took place on seventeen further occasions that year.
Catholics consider Bernadette Soubirous a saint, and many Catholics believe her visions to have been of the Virgin Mary. The first appearance of the "Lady" reported by Bernadette was on 11 February. The others were on February 14, 18-21, 23-25, 27, 28, March 1-4, 25, April 7, and July 16. |
huh. and then as soon as technology reached a stage to capture actual proof of said lady, she strangely decided to stop visiting.
gee, that's a shame. how'm i gonna sell all my lady of lourdes mugs and tshirts now?? :( |
|
|
| MiSSyM |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
gullible fools transfixed in a form of selective reality? |
far from gullible.
But thats your opinion.
| quote: | | huh. and then as soon as technology reached a stage to capture actual proof of said lady, she strangely decided to stop visiting. |
I dont need captured actual proof, because I KNOW SHE IS REAL & EXISTS.
Everyone has their own personal beliefs, as do I.
:tongue2 |
|
|
| Aesthetic |
| explain stigmatics pkc |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Aesthetic
explain stigmatics pkc |
Hoaxes? mutilation?
There is also little more than anecdotal evidence to support stigmata actually occurring. |
|
|
| Aesthetic |
| you wouldnt know because you were never witness to one mate ;) |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Aesthetic
you wouldnt know because you were never witness to one mate ;) |
very true, and i would greatly appreciate the opportunity to view something like that with my own eyes. |
|
|
| batemanscott |
| quote: | Originally posted by MiSSyM
I dont need captured actual proof, because I KNOW SHE IS REAL & EXISTS.
Everyone has their own personal beliefs, as do I.
:tongue2 |
Missy - I dont mean to offend you (or anyone else for that matter) but if you are catholic and you read and believe the catholic bible you will see that the bible says when people die they stay dead, this includes Mary and all the 'saints'.
Many catholics don't realise this as it contradicts many aspects of the religion but it is all in there for you to read.
The dead are only raised upon judgement day.
Therefor none of those things could be true unless it is the 'devil'. |
|
|
| Lilith |
| You guys use way too many words and philosophy for a bunch of crunked EDM fans. |
|
|
| Philby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fledz
Really? Link me!
Oh and there, you just failed the test. None of us wear safety goggles. That's just what we put in the lab manuals to scare first years ;) |
http://minmag.geoscienceworld.org/c...bstract/70/1/51
| quote: | Originally posted by EgosXII
ok, what did you say about the pyramids?
i believe you said it hasn't been explained YET, clearly suggesting it can be explained by science. everything on the earth is explainable by science, don't you think?
examples of anything science admits it can't answer? i mentioned that it literally can't answer the question of god/s, but i think many 'scientists' would think they can... |
you said that scientists never admit that they can't explain certain things. i said that is wrong as they do all the time and keep looking for answers. |
|
|
| EgosXII |
they wouldn't keep looking for answers if they admitted they couldn't answer it. that's my point. not that they admit they don't understand it, but that they say they WILL understand it in the future: nothing that can't be understood in the scientific context. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by EgosXII
they wouldn't keep looking for answers if they admitted they couldn't answer it. that's my point. not that they admit they don't understand it, but that they say they WILL understand it in the future: nothing that can't be understood in the scientific context. |
so, which questions in particular are they trying to answer that you believe are outside the scope of science? |
|
|
| Fledz |
| quote: | Originally posted by EgosXII
they wouldn't keep looking for answers if they admitted they couldn't answer it. that's my point. not that they admit they don't understand it, but that they say they WILL understand it in the future: nothing that can't be understood in the scientific context. |
What? Why not?
That defies being a human being then. We strive to always achieve more and discover answers to everything we can possibly answer. The need for information and answers is what makes you human. |
|
|
|
|
