return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 
Che Guevara (pg. 12)
View this Thread in Original format
Shakka
quote:
Originally posted by Electrophile


bwahahaha. How about a picture of Che wearing a John Belushi "College" shirt?
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Che's decisions didn't kill 100,000 people. His decisions did not permanently injure hundreds of thousands more. And Che did not cause 5 million people to become refugees. At least Che had the balls to tell the truth about why he did what he did. If your going to kill people, you might as well tell the truth about why your going to do it..


omfg, not this 100,000 bullshi#t again.
How many times has this been debunked now?
Kypton use the before pulling number out your A$$ :rolleyes:
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
omfg, not this 100,000 bullshi#t again.
How many times has this been debunked now?
Kypton use the before pulling number out your A$$ :rolleyes:


YES 100 ing THOUSAND! CLICK <--- and that's just Iraqi civilians!

Whose ting a storm now?:rolleyes:
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
YES 100 ing THOUSAND! CLICK <--- and that's just Iraqi civilians!

Whose ting a storm now?:rolleyes:


So Bush killed 100,000 and nobody else huh? :rolleyes:

And quote your sources with your post next time so you're not wasting everyones time...
hardcore trancer
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
So Bush killed 100,000 and nobody else huh? :rolleyes:



Those 100,000 people didnt have to die if it wasnt for the Bush invasion.It is in sad how you still support this god damn war and dont want to admit that Iraq is a in disaster and Bush is to blame.

Dont tell me the whole Saddam was was a evil leader bull either because nobody is buying that anymore.
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Those 100,000 people didnt have to die if it wasnt for the Bush invasion.It is in sad how you still support this god damn war and dont want to admit that Iraq is a in disaster and Bush is to blame.

Dont tell me the whole Saddam was was a evil leader bull either because nobody is buying that anymore.


Because Saddam was such a good guy right? :rolleyes:

God knows how many people he murdered but we're never know that now will we?
Fir3start3r
...and will you Libtards stop changing the damn subject!?

This Iraq thing has been done to death - you'd think you like to hear yourselves talk sheesh...
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
So Bush killed 100,000 and nobody else huh? :rolleyes:

And quote your sources with your post next time so you're not wasting everyones time...


Yes, Bush's actions led to the deaths of over 100,000 people. You can try to excuse this all you want. Just because Saddam was a tard does not excuse my president from joining him!

Debunked... looks like you've just been debunked..;)

quote:
Because Saddam was such a good guy right?

God knows how many people he murdered but we're never know that now will we?


Please, don't waste our time with straw man arguments..:rolleyes:

I, nor anyone else, ever touted Baathist Iraq as a shining example of good governance. But I'm not surprised you, like Latinlover, excuse American aggression, while condemning others of the same exact thing.

----------------------

And we get back to original point. Che is nothing compared to George W Bush as the epitome of incompetent leadership. 50 years from now, you won't be finding no youths wearing GW Bush t-shirts, I guarantee you that!
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
...and will you Libtards stop changing the damn subject!?

This Iraq thing has been done to death - you'd think you like to hear yourselves talk sheesh...


Hey, you want to trash talk Che. No problem. I know one president far far worse than Che ever was. I mentioned him. And all you can come up is....nothing really....libtard? Never heard that one before...can I call you neo-conned?
pkcRAISTLIN
i think the various groups inside iraq killed more people than the US. why doesn't anyone ever lay the blame at their feet? :conf:

shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i think the various groups inside iraq killed more people than the US. why doesn't anyone ever lay the blame at their feet? :conf:

Contrived or not, maybe because it was a predictable consequence even Dick Cheney has been well aware of well before any of this happened. From the horses mouth:

So intelligent people don't really buy this incompetence BS facade / excuse. And none of this would have happened with out US intervention, or the desecration of Imam Hussein's and his tribes grave sides and bombing of the mosque. And perhaps you don't like holding leaders accountable for the predictable consequences of their actions, but level headed people do... making the US 100% responsible for it. Being a centrist isn't necessarily a rational choice, especially when logic and elementary ethics dictates otherwise ;).
George Smiley
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i think the various groups inside iraq killed more people than the US. why doesn't anyone ever lay the blame at their feet? :conf:

Well if there isn't a chance to criticise America for somethin then what's the point of criticising at all?!
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 
Privacy Statement