Originally posted by Bierheld
Next time you open a thread like this you might want to try to... I dunno, formulate an argument? Leave some room for discussion?
makes perfect sense.
But the fact that 1 person (Clovis), who didn't even like me on this site, understood what this thread was about, it showed I wasn't talking out of my ass. the rest thought I was trolling because they're outcasts who were never around when this debate occured.
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by Mattinsanity
makes perfect sense.
Well, you ing well don't make any sense, what-so-ever.
Ted Promo
quote:
Originally posted by Mattinsanity
makes perfect sense.
But the fact that 1 person (Clovis), who didn't even like me on this site
Do you happen to be familiar with the term facetious?
Redd
People think you're trolling because they don't think anyone can be that stupid, not because they're "outcasts".
Ignorelist welcomes you.
Adam420
quote:
Originally posted by corjay9
This is a progressive trance 'joint' cuz it's certainly not house.
nah
Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by Redd
Ignorelist welcomes you.
Just stop replying then or change your name to SYSTEM-Redd.
Redd
quote:
Originally posted by Trance-MB
Just stop replying then or change your name to SYSTEM-Redd.
Sure, you can get a spot too.
SYSTEM-Redd, that was a good one, did your 12 year old son come up with that? Rhetorical question, you're ignored.
Trance-MB
No, my 2 year old did and also told me you would reply like a 12 year old.
Mattinsanity
quote:
Originally posted by corjay9
This is a progressive trance 'joint' cuz it's certainly not house.
do you really think this track is progressive? I googled the definition and this is what I got:
Happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
sounds like pretty strong word based on that.
do I admit progressive trance exists? yes. But will I agree with 90% of what people label as progressive trance? no.
Trance-MB
According to discogs: Genre: Elektronic Style: Techno
Personally I never used progressive trance to describe music I listened. Why does it need to have a different name when it's slower than normal, if there is a normal?
After Childeren was called Dream-house I stopped thinking about how to call them.
This 1993 classic is listed as Progressive Trance, Trance and Tech House, but I'm happy with just calling it Trance:
Lews
quote:
Originally posted by Mattinsanity
do you really think this track is progressive? I googled the definition and this is what I got:
Happening or developing gradually or in stages; proceeding step by step.
sounds like pretty strong word based on that.
do I admit progressive trance exists? yes. But will I agree with 90% of what people label as progressive trance? no.
God dammit. You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by Redd
Ignorelist welcomes you.
