|
Finally! Noah's Ark discovered! (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
To be fair, Noah's Ark does not require the flooding of the whole Earth. It could've been just a regional thing that became a myth. Therefore, if you prove Noah's Ark existed it does not mean the flooding as described in the Bible existed ;) |
from memory (and correct me if im wrong mr hazard) the bible makes it quite clear that god floods the world. If it was merely a localised phenomenon, why the need for animals by twos? Id also like to know how a “regional” flood could exist 4000m above sea level ;) |
|
|
| woscar |
| What Lira is talking about is a regional flood that could have inspired someone to write a myth about it. |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by D-res
So evangelicals used carbon dating - a method they don't believe in - to prove their point? |
lol... This is an excellent point |
|
|
| woscar |
I'd love to see how UNESCO responds to this:
| quote: | | Local Turkish officials will ask the central government in Ankara to apply for UNESCO World Heritage status so the site can be protected while a major archaeological dig is conducted, Mr Yeung added. |
:haha: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by woscar
What Lira is talking about is a regional flood that could have inspired someone to write a myth about it. |
Well duh ;) |
|
|
| woscar |
| LOL, I didn't notice the intrinsic sarcasm of your statement. :p |
|
|
| saluyamo |
| Didnt they apparently find the Ark several years ago? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by woscar
LOL, I didn't notice the intrinsic sarcasm of your statement. :p |
No sarcasm, just trying to point out the problems with either the myth or reality hypothesis (within the context of this thread topic).
If the ark story is true, you’d need to explain why plenty of animals (not to mention people) survived the great flood of 7000 years ago who never had a chance to “all aboard”.
If the story is a myth, based upon a regional flood and some guy who built a boat, then it would have to explain how the boat managed to get up a mountain 4000m (i think that was the rough height, someone correct me if im wrong) high, if it was merely a flooding of a region. I would’ve thought a water level that high would be a tad bigger than a regional flooding.
Either way, I call bollocks! :) |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| quote: | | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Id also like to know how a “regional” flood could exist 4000m above sea level ;) |
this |
|
|
| woscar |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
No sarcasm, just trying to point out the problems with either the myth or reality hypothesis (within the context of this thread topic).
|
Sarcasm in the sense that you're not asking a question with the intention of getting an answer, but rather to ridicule both "hypotheses" (something I approve of, btw :p ). |
|
|
| The17sss |
| quote: | Originally posted by saluyamo
Didnt they apparently find the Ark several years ago? |
yeah but this time it's REAL! lol |
|
|
| yukii |
I believe it. In fact, I had an apparition of the flying spaghetti monster, his holiness told me to carry out his work.
I need the last 5 winners of Mr Universe, duct tape, and a bottle of Nutella. This is the prophecy I was told and must carry out :o |
|
|
|
|
