|
two animals hack poor brit to pieces (pg. 13)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spacey Orange
Then why just not shoot him and be done with it? Why use meat cleavers and slaughter him as if he were a bloody animal, if its not to instill fear?
If it really were retributiom, they ahould have done their evil deed, and release a manifesto or explanation of some sort and keep doing it.
Youre argument that it wasnt terrorism just doesn't hold. |
Do you know how hard it is to get a gun in the UK? |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
that how the Americans are not calling this a terrorist attack.. |
They're not, in fact it's not getting much coverage in the news at all. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
They're not, in fact it's not getting much coverage in the news at all. |
And we probably never will since it will not fit their whole war on terror agenda. |
|
|
| Spacey Orange |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Do you know how hard it is to get a gun in the UK? |
Thats beside the point and doesn't address the questions that i posed. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spacey Orange
Thats beside the point and doesn't address the questions that i posed. |
You said why not shoot him and be done with it. I did address your question. The even flat out said that the attack was in response to killings by British soldiers against Muslims in other areas of the world. How do you not understand that the motivation was revenge and not terrorism? |
|
|
| Vector A |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lagrangian
I will abstain from commenting as my views are most likely to be deemed racist and extreme. |
Probably because they are. |
|
|
| Spacey Orange |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
You said why not shoot him and be done with it. I did address your question. The even flat out said that the attack was in response to killings by British soldiers against Muslims in other areas of the world. How do you not understand that the motivation was revenge and not terrorism? |
Shoot him, strangle him, whatever.
My point was that the public gruesome manner on which they did it, the grand show if you will, was designed to instill fear and revolt the public.
This is much more like the beheading of Daniel Pearl than the American major that shot his follow officers in a military facility. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| Okay, so when the US had the WTC destroyed by terrorists, and we went in and bombed the living out of Afghanistan and Iraq, would you call that act by the US terrorism? The shock and awe campaign of showing them how we're capable of leveling whole cities? The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Is that terrorism? It was meant to instill fear in Japan, so it must be terrorism according to your definition, right? |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
the US had the WTC destroyed by terrorists |
Aha! TRUTHER! Get 'im, pkc. |
|
|
| Vector A |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Aha! TRUTHER! Get 'im, pkc. |
:stongue:
Ah, the vagaries of grammar. |
|
|
| SkyHigh |
this is a perfect example....of i condemn but its your fault mentality..Copied from news article
Across the street, Asghar Bukhari had a different take on the violence. While he condemned the killing, Mr. Bukhari blamed the government’s foreign policy, saying it had oppressed Muslims around the world and paved the way for disenfranchised young radicals at home to strike out.
“Religion is linked, but it is not the root cause,” said Mr. Bukhari, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, a civil rights group. “The Koran doesn’t say turn the other cheek. The Koran says fight injustice.” |
|
|
| enydo |
| WAKE UP PEOPLE, YOUR LEADERS ARE LYING TO YOUR FACES. |
|
|
|
|
