|
Tranceaddict's Top 100 EDM Tracks (as of 2004 / mainly Trance) (pg. 29)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Kongo_kim |
1 William Orbit - Barber Adagio For Strings (Ferry Corsten remix)
2 Delerium - Silence (Tiesto ISOS remix)
3 System F - Out Of The Blue
4 Perpetous Dreamer - Future Funland
5 Gouryella - Gouryella
6 DJ Tiesto - Flight 643
7 Blank & Jones - Cream (PVD remix)
8 Gouryella - Walhalla
9 PPK - Ressurection
10 Frank Biazzi - Turbulence |
|
|
| Creamfields23 |
How about letting a single individu from every forum opening a thread in their local forum leading to this one ? (Or even better mention this one in the mod forum so they can open a thread in their local forum leading to this one)
It's absurt that a forum as big as this one can't get enough votes :whip: |
|
|
| Reactic |
| quote: | Originally posted by Creamfields23
How about letting a single individu from every forum opening a thread in their local forum leading to this one ? (Or even better mention this one in the mod forum so they can open a thread in their local forum leading to this one)
It's absurt that a forum as big as this one can't get enough votes :whip: |
there are enough votes, I want see the results! |
|
|
| DJ_Bod |
| quote: | Originally posted by Reactic
there are enough votes, I want see the results! |
+1 |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| No there aren't. |
|
|
| byte |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
No there aren't. |
Yes there are.
So there are a bunch of tracks that miss by one point, that's the way the cookie crumbles. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by byte
Yes there are.
So there are a bunch of tracks that miss by one point, that's the way the cookie crumbles. |
What about the fact that 40 or so tracks share a ten point difference? That means about ten tracks have the same amount of points. That isn't accurate enough. |
|
|
| ierxium |
| Imagine having more then ten at number one? I don't think that was the initial purpose of this thread. Hope this problem gets solved so we can see some results. |
|
|
| byte |
| quote: | Originally posted by ierxium
Imagine having more then ten at number one? I don't think that was the initial purpose of this thread. Hope this problem gets solved so we can see some results. |
If there are ten tracks tied for number one, then the next ranking should be #11, not #2. That's the proper way to do it.
SYSTEM-J, I appreciate your efforts to make this as accurate as possible, but look at the bottom few entries of the Top 100 DJs at http://www.thedjlist.com They are only seperated by 3-5 votes, and that is on a site where 10s of thousands of people have voted. I think you were being a little too ambitious if you ever expected the votes for this poll to be that widely spread out. |
|
|
| The_G0dfather |
| The easiest solution i can think of is letting this thread continue for some time ... i'm sure alot more ppl will vote (at least i had a number one no one else voted for, so i did my best :) ) |
|
|
| orbsplateau |
Hi,
just a suggestion (i have some backround in math/stats and working with empirical data).
To create a top 100 list from users' top 10 lists, the first song on each list must get 100 points, not 10.
Here's how it would work:
1 - 100
2 - 99
3 - 98
4 - 97
5 - 96
6 - 95
7 - 94
8 - 93
9 - 92
10- 91
Why?
suppose 100 people vote.
For some reason, 11 of those people rank Scooter's "Jigga Jigga" as their top song... but no-one else votes for it. The song would still get 110 points (under the current system).
Let's suppose 90 people list Faithless' "God is a DJ" at their #10 all time favourite song.
Under the current system it would only get 90 points... a few notches below Scooter. Even though it's clearly a more "favoured" song.
under the 100 point system,
scooter would get 11 x 100 = 1100 points.
Faithless would get 90 x 91 = 8190 points.
Awarding 10 points to the first, and 1 point to the last song is ideal for creating some sort of ultimate top 10 list... but it would create a very misleading top 100 list.
As is, the first song doesn't just get 9 more points than the #10 song... it gets 10 TIMES MORE POINTS!
Once the list is compiled, 20 songs or so would get a HUGE amount of points... but the rest wouldn't get anything... so ranking them would be very difficult.
just an idea... |
|
|
| isoterra |
I like the idea behind that system... I'm not sure the difference between 1 and 10 should be that small though, perhaps something more like:
1 - 100pts
2 - 95pts
3 - 90pts
4 - 85pts
5 - 80pts
6 - 75pts
7 - 70pts
8 - 65pts
9 - 60pts
10 - 55pts
...or you could rank them all up using a variety of different systems and then work out averages, if you wanna be really fair :p |
|
|
|
|
