|
Dj Tiesto Remix Of Radiohead - Street Spirt 12" Promo (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Floorfiller |
| it wouldn't be illegal if you gave them to the distributors for free...but of course that isn't gonna happen... |
|
|
| George Kendall |
| quote: | Originally posted by Floorfiller
it wouldn't be illegal if you gave them to the distributors for free...but of course that isn't gonna happen... |
its still the illegal distribution of copyrighted material...so yes it is |
|
|
| keithos27 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Laushinameee
I dont think they are. I cant speak for madonna but I wouldnt want any old fool remixing my tracks, Felix da Housecat - fine, Sasha - fine, Bt - fine, tiesto - not fine. Its quite simple. |
that is YOUR opinion.... |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| Radiohead > Trance. |
|
|
| placebo |
| quote: | Originally posted by beats and beeps
Radiohead > Trance. |
> Trance |
|
|
| Simcut |
lol some bastar paid £100 for that ? lol! :stongue:
The Wonky vs Radiohead version owns the Tiesto. |
|
|
| keithos27 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Simcut
lol some bastar paid £100 for that ? lol! :stongue:
The Wonky vs Radiohead version owns the Tiesto. |
True! |
|
|
| isoterra |
| quote: | Originally posted by Laushinameee
i still dont get your point? Madonna doesnt need to gain popularity, she is already popular. Plus shes already done a load of work with William Orbit & Sasha, who are actually respected in the EDM scene, unlike tiesto - he may be popular, but his fanbase are the 14-18 year olds mainly. |
Your posts never cease to make me laugh. Keep it up ;) |
|
|
| eyeball_2003 |
long live ing white labels! :stongue:
cant wait to a whip a copy of this up if it is really getting a release, will look very nice in my record box... ahh can picture it now, and my deepest condolences go out to the ude who spent £103 on the vinyl on ebay, when this does get a release he will be sick as a dog! :D |
|
|
| KrissO |
| quote: | Originally posted by eyeball_2003
long live ing white labels! :stongue:
cant wait to a whip a copy of this up if it is really getting a release, will look very nice in my record box... ahh can picture it now, and my deepest condolences go out to the ude who spent £103 on the vinyl on ebay, when this does get a release he will be sick as a dog! :D |
He probably will, but he can still say "I got it second!" :D :D |
|
|
| keithos27 |
so WHERE can you buy this online and WHEN?
-keith |
|
|
| Wilko |
| quote: | Originally posted by thesuperfunk
Not true .. i know someone who used to be quite good friends with the guy responsible for JPS Vs. Paul van Dyk bootleg that used the Rachel McFarlane vocal. Originally he only got a very small quantity pressed before someone went on to bootleg his bootleg .. before he knew it he had Vandit's lawyers breathing down his neck and found himself trying to explain that he wasn't responsible for all of the copies floating around.
The type of label something gets pressed on doesn't matter .. you're still putting it out there to make profit. It could be a white or it could be like a normal release but at the end of the day if you don't own the copyrights or have permission to use the material it's still illegal.
I'm not condoning the use of white labels .. i have plenty of them myself. I just feel that a name on Tiesto's scale doing something like this is pretty unprofessional and doesn't set a good example for all those below him. |
But the bottom line is, if no more than 1000 copies are pressed.. there's absolutely nothing anybodies lawyers can do about it. Doesen't matter what you sample/rip-off, nobody can touch you unless you've pressed more than 1000. Nobody would do it if there was even the smallest risk of getting legally raped for it, so to speak.
Pressing 2000, like the case is here.. i'm not however sure about. I've always lived along the fact you aren't allowed to press more than 1000 of any bootleg, no matter what sample/material it contains.
However, i'm sure it's not amazingly hard to get away with pressing more than the "so called" 1000 limit. Certain artists, who i won't name, have more than obviously done so. |
|
|
|
|
