|
Looks like Canadians are finally getting it.... (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by ShadoWolf
Maybe in Quebec, but that's not the Anglo-Canadian/American way. |
shut the up you idiot!
we didn't even vote for the liberals, you ontarians did.
:whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
thats how it is and always be. |
Its funny how you would tolerate kickbacks, thuggery, extortion and theft as if we lived in a 3rd world country. This is what the Liberals did and then used that money to get elected. All we need now are disappearing people and we'd have just about any latin country up until the 80s and just about any african country today. Sorry but i dont want my country to be a frozen banana country. |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
I hope you guys don't take this poll seriously!! |
True, I'm always skeptical of polls.
| quote: | | People will forget about the allegations found in the Gommery commission, especially after a tax break in the next budget "update"... |
Maybe, but at their own peril.
| quote: | | the PC aka hillbillies won't be in power until they shut their radical wing down aka the shadowolves of this nation. |
Where the do you get off? I support the Green Party provincially, am Italian, am a raging metrosexual, and I listen to trance not country. :rolleyes:
Out of curiousity, do you support the legalization of prostitution? What about polygamy? |
|
|
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jayx1
Its funny how you would tolerate kickbacks, thuggery, extortion and theft as if we lived in a 3rd world country. This is what the Liberals did and then used that money to get elected. All we need now are disappearing people and we'd have just about any latin country up until the 80s and just about any african country today. Sorry but i dont want my country to be a frozen banana country. |
I never said i tolerated that!
People forget, and get their attention diverted by tax "breaks".
its the oldest trick in the bag.
And the longer you stay in power, the more corrupted you become, power corrupts.
My point is that people are mad about the allegations, but they're just allegations at this moment. And the people in power are good at public relations, they'll divert everyone's attention in due time :) |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
shut the up you idiot!
we didn't even vote for the liberals, you ontarians did.
:whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: |
Trudeau? From Quebec.
Mulroney? From Quebec.
Bouchard and Duceppe? From Quebec.
Chretien? From Quebec.
Martin? From Quebec.
Chuck Guite? From Quebec.
Gagliano? From Quebec.
Sponsorship scandel? IN QUEBEC.
You're only partly right about Ontario: it's mostly Toronto's fault. |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
shut the up you idiot!
we didn't even vote for the liberals, you ontarians did.
:whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: |
I'll never understand Ontario and i live here. But the Bloc is 10 times worse. But at least Quebecors have some of that european spirit and wont take it up the pooper like we do in Ontario. |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by malek
And the longer you stay in power, the more corrupted you become, power corrupts.
|
According to Gomery it only took the Liberals a year to figure out how to rip us off.
But I agree, which is why its time to dump the liberals. |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by baystreetboi
Back in the 40s and 50s, people would say that there WAS a fundamental difference between blacks and whites as to education, which is why they had separate schools in the first place. Obviously society has evolved enough to realize that was silly.
|
Society has evolved. There is a large group of blacks in Toronto that want to recreate seperate school boards for races now that the shoe is on the other foot and it would be to their advantage. It just shows that racism is in all people and is not just a white male disease. |
|
|
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by ShadoWolf
Out of curiousity, do you support the legalization of prostitution? What about polygamy? |
Its always funny that you do it on purpose to assimilate me with muslims just because I have a syrian flag, you are a ing racist and you should get banned from this board for good!
Edit: even tho I told you a million time i'm not muslim. |
|
|
| Jayx1 |
| actually the liberal party is openingly discussing the possibility of legalizing prostitution. |
|
|
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by ShadoWolf
Trudeau? From Quebec.
Mulroney? From Quebec.
Bouchard and Duceppe? From Quebec.
Chretien? From Quebec.
Martin? From Quebec.
Chuck Guite? From Quebec.
Gagliano? From Quebec.
Sponsorship scandel? IN QUEBEC.
You're only partly right about Ontario: it's mostly Toronto's fault. |
So its Quebec's fault if you guys in English Canada can't create competent politicians... yeah right, you almost got me there:rolleyes: |
|
|
| ShadoWolf |
| quote: | Originally posted by baystreetboi
We've gone over this before. Provincial courts have just as much jurisdiction to rule on federal matters as does the Supreme Court. In fact, they HAVE to. Anything that deals with a federal matter does not get referred to the Supreme Court right off the bat. All proceedings start in the provincial courts before being escalated. The Supreme Court only deals with appeals, and only then those that deal with a significant question of law.
And did you actually read that decision? The court did not say that traditional marriage is not unconstitutional. That was specifically dealt with in question #4 of the reference case, which the Supreme Court REFUSED to answer (because of all the problems ruling one way or another would create). |
Perhaps you haven't read the decision. It specifically says the FEDERAL PARLIAMENT has exclusive jurisdiction.
| quote: | | A gay union may be fundamentally different from YOUR definition of traditional marriage, |
There is only one definition in this country, and that was from Hyde v. Hyde.
| quote: | | And in this case, it ONLY involves civil marriage, and from a strictly civil law point of view, all citizens should be subject to the same rights and responsibilities. |
| quote: | | Dr. William D. Gairdner: "All government policies are intentionally preferential. If we want welfare or veterans¹ benefits, or child-support, or marital benefits, we have to qualify for them. Such policies are ordinary forms of distributive justice through which, for its own good, the state discriminates in favour of some people, and some relationships, and not others. So an absence of "equality" is not a good argument against such policies." |
|
|
|
|
|
