|
help me c0re! legal advice needed... (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DJ RJT |
Sorry, but this just seems appropriate here...
AMERIC0RE! YEAH! COMIN AGAIN TO SAVE THE MOTHAIN DAY YEAH! |
|
|
| lücid |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RJT
Sorry, but this just seems appropriate here...
AMERIC0RE! YEAH! COMIN AGAIN TO SAVE THE MOTHAIN DAY YEAH! |
hahaha omg i lol'd... americ0re. :haha:
 |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RJT
Sorry, but this just seems appropriate here...
AMERIC0RE! YEAH! COMIN AGAIN TO SAVE THE MOTHAIN DAY YEAH! |
LOLCOCKFAGH4X! |
|
|
| jonze234 |
| if the check was made out so both of you need to sign it then you should be entitled to some of the money. |
|
|
| Orbax |
From my knowledge of law, there is no binding agreement with either party regarding the cash. Saying that you signed the papers and left and were "done with it all" would imply that further money is no longer your domain. It being money coming from an earlier payment, the payer would be the one entitled to the cash, and the primary resident/renter.
The only way I see you "deserving" the money is for damages suffered from premature termination of the living contract, but youd have to prove in a small claims court that said contract existed and furthermore that the contract was terminated unconsentingly and due to this unconsented to termination, 100 dollars of damage was incurred. |
|
|
| DigitalMP |
let me reiterate, she's not an attorney, and she doesn't want to play one. embarrassing him will get you nowhere. you want your $100 here, that's the goal, so you need to avoid miscues.
that's the beauty of e-mail - dealing with an issue over that medium can almost be like not dealing with the issue. i say you e-mail him and pour out your bleeding heart for all the bull he put you through, and guilt him into giving you the $100 because he "owes it to you".
however, stick with getting $100 for signing it, because he won't split the cash with you once it's in his hand. |
|
|
| UWM |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
LOLCOCKFAGH4X! |
 |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by UWM
|
:haha: |
|
|
| lücid |
damn... Walker and Dave, you guys both make good points.
legally though, there isn't any way he can make me sign the check, right? i mean if he is presented with the ultimatum of "give me half or you get nothing" he can't really do anything about it, can he? i mean i'm not going to go through any trouble just to get the $100 if he wants to be a dick about it... i just won't sign anything.
i don't want to e-mail him if i don't have to, even though i know the $100 will be easier to get if i send him a polite e-mail about it. |
|
|
| Spacey Orange |
have him send you the check and a self addressed stamped envelope, and then cut the check up into several pieces and mail it back to him.
if you're really that hard up for $100, post some boob shots and solicit $1 donations |
|
|
| Floorfiller |
i agree. i say get him to give you $100 cash when you sign it because lord knows you won't get it afterwards...
he's either out $100 bucks or not...
there's no legal issue here...it's in both your names...meaning you're equally entitled to the money whether he paid the back taxes or not...
just consider it tax :p |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by lücid
damn... Walker and Dave, you guys both make good points.
legally though, there isn't any way he can make me sign the check, right? i mean if he is presented with the ultimatum of "give me half or you get nothing" he can't really do anything about it, can he? i mean i'm not going to go through any trouble just to get the $100 if he wants to be a dick about it... i just won't sign anything.
i don't want to e-mail him if i don't have to, even though i know the $100 will be easier to get if i send him a polite e-mail about it. |
Technically what youd be doing is extortion if you demanded money in return for the signature. Especially when you, as I see it, have no legal right to the money.
What is the nature of the check, and why is the money coming back? I wasnt clear on that |
|
|
|
|
