|
Current Hamas and Israel Issue. (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| beno86 |
first of all jewish extremist of the 50s differ greatly from palestinian extremist of today by the main difference that there intent was never to kill any civilians or any one else for that fact when the king david hotel was bombed by jewish resistance in the 50s the extremist called the hotel to make sure it would be evacuated . as for the palestians they try to maximise deaths by hitting the most crowded areas of downtown jerusalem. not only do they try to kill israelis and elect a goverment whos sworn objective is to destroy israel off the map(not much space for negotiation there), they also try to blame their own ups on israel ie '' jenine massacre '' and this recent scandal on the gaza beach which in the end was found to be planted on the beach by palestians forces to keeep israel from attacking its beaches.As for the whole ocupation theory there has NEVER been a palestian people that controlled a land called palestine. before israel it was under british mandate.
the day the palestinians put down their weapons there will be peace
the day israel does the same it will cease to exist. |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
lol...biased much?
zionists are funny
the rhetoric you are spewing sounds strangely like something that would be said in germany in the 30's;) |
|
|
| beno86 |
sadly you dont know you speak of things are very easy to judge from far away but i never advocate the destruction of the palestinians ppl and most israelies believe in the getting rid of settlement .
being a zionist doesnt mean not believing in the equality of palestinians where as being a hamas supporter means that the destruction of israel is a necessary event to fullfilling the hamas chart. the hamas lead goverment cheers the destruction of israel and yet cries that we should give them money and job opurtunities in israel...! .Israel wont fall for it twice . last time we conceded medical supplies and weapons to the arafat goverment they were stockpiled and use to kill the israel people that had helped them so much. Yes the palestian economy is in shambles but thats there fault if israelis didnt have to fear for their lives while shopping or eating pizza then maybe israel would grant more permits to the palestinians. |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
you dont understand,
im not saying the plaestinians are in the right at all.If you read your first comment over again, this mentality assures there will never be peace.Only the plaestinians should disarm...:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
maybe if israel made more effort towards the peace process, the terrorism would stop;) Saying the israelis are such good people because they "helped" the plaestinians by allowing them basic human rights such as medicine is ing disgusting.Attitudes like yours are partly the reason why this will never end.One side will never conceed,THEY BOTH HAVE TO.BOTH THE PALESTINIANS AND ISRAELIS ARE AT FAULT HERE.blood is on the hands of both sides and no matter what you say it is not right.
what about the innocent palestinians who die at the hands of israeli soldiers every day....their lives arent worth as much because israel says so? |
|
|
| beno86 |
| and btw this conflict goes to way back before the the establishment of israel so its not a question of occupation in 1929 before israel was established the local arab community rioted and killed 67 jews so its not a question of occupation. |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
answer me this.
is an israeli life worth more than a palestinian one just because the israeli economy is better? |
|
|
| beno86 |
| of course israelies want peace 1947 the country was suppose to be divided into two but the palestians presentatives refused it. and the day after its gets established a multitude of arab countries attack proving they dont want to talk they just want to kill. this of course isnt a majority there are alot of great palestinians polticians that would rather see there people live in peace and prosperity (mahmoud abbas) but unfortunately they cant control the the people (voted for hamas) or the millitias meaning that most palestinians are not looking for a peaceful solution where as in israel when kadima party is formed as a break away from likud as a more peace oriented group they get elected and win control of the knesset. same thing happened at camp david israel offered east jerusalem , independence and unrooting of territories and yet Yasser arafat walked away back to his fleet of mercedes and servant while his people starved and searched for jobs. |
|
|
| beno86 |
answer me this does a 1 year old israeli baby shot at point blank range in the temple just as acceptable as the the targeted assasination of people who haved planned the murder of civilians .
of course every life is worthy but if you do the crime (plan a suicide bombing ) you get whats coming to you.
when palestinians children and women die its a shame but notice its tend to be casualites of mis fired rockets or fathers telling them to start daddy car for him. they deserve to live like every other child in the world but as we know in war happens unintentionally sometimes . no tell me that that shalhevet levy the 1 year old was a casualty shot at point blank range ! |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
no all lives are equal
the point im trying to make is that BOTH israelis and palestinians are acting like animals.
NO SIDE IS RIGHT, THEY ARE BOTH BEING PIG HEADED IDIOTS. |
|
|
| Marcus007 |
| Then why does the world tend to favor the Isaeli side of things? Why don't they continuously condem Israel like they condem Palastine? I doubt any casualties on Israel's behalf are on purpose but as beno said... a ONE YEAR old baby shot at point blank is just... unacceptable... |
|
|
| malek |
| quote: | Originally posted by all-nite-freak
answer me this.
is an israeli life worth more than a palestinian one just because the israeli economy is better? |
yes but not because economy is better, because the living standard is better, just as a canadian life is worth more than a xyz banana country. |
|
|
| all-nite-freak |
| so the solution is to kill everyone that has a lower standard of living? |
|
|
|
|