|
Mormons on TA.? (pg. 14)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Subey
I magnanimously acknowledge that your nick was given to you by Allah with reason :D, she is Wise |
REVERSED! |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by lex400sc
and pushing science and knowledge of science is not the same as pushing a belief system |
yet i rarely see anyone push biology/chemistry/mathematics/physics/etc as fervently as they do atheism. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by wienerschnitzel
fair enough, i think i see where this is going...
ok, you're right lex400sc, about EVERYTHING. i'm sorry. |
:stongue:  |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
...the faith is somewhat blind because it is often supported by theories and supposed "laws" - but when we look far enough, those laws are being contantly broken and defied. |
please provide an example of a fundamental (supposedly) universal law of physics being broken. |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
please provide an example of a fundamental (supposedly) universal law of physics being broken. |
lol |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Subey
Lex
Has the following ever occurred to you?
Anything is infinitely less plausible than nothing?
or to rephrase
That the basic construct of a universe emerging from a big bang (or God for that matter) is infinitely less logical than nothing for ever in every direction (realizing of course that direction is being used here as a symbolic reference point to make the concept easier to digest rather than referring to any cardinal points) |
and this statement is based on what? where did you gather your probabilistic data from? |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by lex400sc
you call it ego, i call it altruism, and i call your condition dependancy and denial |
there's no such thing as unegoistical altruism, and hence by most definitions of the word, there's no such thing as altruism. |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by lex400sc
lol i am always fascinated by how people like you arrive at your conclusions. i guess the sky is the limit when a part of your rationale accepts miracles that defy all physical laws :haha: |
also, your perceptive abilities are.... nil. |
|
|
| Subey |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
and this statement is based on what? where did you gather your probabilistic data from? |
The use of probability is a weak attempt to place a concept into the mind's hand, and not to place the concept onto an actuarial table.
In other words...
Infinity can not be grasped, and doesn't need to be. We can stretch our minds in the direction of infinity, that is enough to acquire a symbolic representation of it to use conceptually.
Nothing comes to the party alone. Anything comes with the burden of answering the question "what is your origin", scientists don't go there. They go as far as a billionth of a second after the big bang.
Once you conceptually examine anything beyond that point nothing's point outweigh's anything's in an argument that is lobsided infinitely to its side. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
and this statement is based on what? where did you gather your probabilistic data from? |
2 dice :p |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by lex400sc
so you basically made an assumption. roger. |
thank you captain obvious (btw, i assume you have inhaled and exhaled at least once within the past minute). |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by Subey
Nothing comes to the party alone. |
.................................and this statement is based on what? |
|
|
|
|
