|
24 Season 6 Official Thread. [No Spoilers Please/Respect our West Coast Friends too!] (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| stren |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
I hope you saw the preview for next week ;)
Nice to know what it takes to bring Jack back from the edge in less than an hour :) |
I didn't watch the preview
thanks for the spoiler !
delete this thread, its so full of spoilers
:mad: |
|
|
| infinity HiGH |
| quote: | Originally posted by stren
I didn't watch the preview
thanks for the spoiler !
delete this thread, its so full of spoilers
:mad: |
Yea !!! :mad: :mad: |
|
|
| RJT |
Definition of a Spoiler: Something that hasn't aired on TV yet. I only added the "Wait for the West Coast" because it seemed fair.
Tough - and like either of you hadn't figured that out already anyway.
:p
Once it been broadcast to the whole of North America (where the show originates/primarily airs) - it's officially no longer a spoiler. If people don't want to know ANYTHING at all about the show, they shouldn't be reading the thread in the first place.
I don't really care for this to turn into a discussion of particularities. |
|
|
| dj_bas |
| lol, what the are you guys talking about? All I see is "OMG" "" "NOOO" :stongue: Best show evar! |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_bas
lol, what the are you guys talking about? All I see is "OMG" "" "NOOO" :stongue: Best show evar! |
Word... I've got last night's episode on PVR and had intended on watching it tonight. Of course there's no point now as I clearly know exactly what happened. |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Word... I've got last night's episode on PVR and had intended on watching it tonight. Of course there's no point now as I clearly know exactly what happened. |
Again, why would you even read a thread about 24, knowing the episode is over, if you intended on watching it tonight?
:conf:
This all seems like common sense to me.
1. Don't discuss an episode you've seen before it airs, for the rest of us.
2. If you haven't seen this weeks episode, don't open a thread intended to discuss it.
Am I missing something here - or...? |
|
|
| dj_bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Again, why would you even read a thread about 24, knowing the episode is over, if you intended on watching it tonight?
:conf:
This all seems like common sense to me.
1. Don't discuss an episode you've seen before it airs, for the rest of us.
2. If you haven't seen this weeks episode, don't open a thread intended to discuss it.
3. OMG, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Am I missing something here - or...? |
Fixed. |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_bas
Fixed. |
Ah, much better. Thanks Bas. |
|
|
| RapidFire |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Definition of a Spoiler: Something that hasn't aired on TV yet. I only added the "Wait for the West Coast" because it seemed fair.
|
hmmm thats very debatable. you'd be suprised how many ppl who tune out when they show the previews so that its an entirely fresh experience when the next episode airs.
im not one of them but i did make a thread like this last year and people constantly complained whenver seomthing was mentioned about the previews. so out of respect for those who dont want to be spoiled even the slightest you dont really have to discuss them... |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by RapidFire
hmmm thats very debatable. you'd be suprised how many ppl who tune out when they show the previews so that its an entirely fresh experience when the next episode airs.
im not one of them but i did make a thread like this last year and people constantly complained whenver seomthing was mentioned about the previews. so out of respect for those who dont want to be spoiled even the slightest you dont really have to discuss them... |
Regardless - I'm saying they're fair game, thus rendering the issue moot.
It's half the fun in discussing the upcoming episode, and the previews really give little to no indication of what's actually going to happen. |
|
|
| RapidFire |
| quote: | Originally posted by josh4
SUTHERLAND SET FIRE TO DOLL PROTOTYPE
KIEFER SUTHERLAND
KIEFER SUTHERLAND only has himself to blame for the delay of his 24 action figure - he set fire to the prototype during a drunken night out. The action man's new figure has been developed by MCFarlane Toys and will hit stores later this year (07), but the mini-JACK BAUER should have hit shelves much earlier. Sutherland explains, "They tried to come out with one a couple of years ago and they had sent me the doll for my approval... We took the doll out for a night to have some fun and we'd had some drinks. We sat it on the corner of the table. "We started torturing him around 11 o'clock at night, and, by two o'clock in the morning, we had set him on fire in the parking lot. "We got up the next day and there was just this puddle of wax. His clothes didn't burn, which I thought was pretty cool... and then I got a call the next day saying, 'Did you like the doll?' I said, 'Yeah, it was great.' And they said, 'Well, OK, good, you gotta send it back to us because that was the prototype... It took that guy a year to make it.' "I said, 'Well, let me look for it, I think I left it in the trailer.' This went on for about a week and then I had to just kinda come clean."
http://www.contactmusic.com/news.ns...ototype_1018941 |
:stongue: first he humps a christmas tree then he tortures a doll of himself. id hang out with him! |
|
|
|
|
