|
Circumcision (pg. 12)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Forget that there are peer-reviewed studies and other trustworthy sources providing research and statistics...
It's hilarious that those arguing against this can't just apply basic logic and think about how foreskin would contribute to increased risk of STDs.
It's really not that ludicrous of an idea. I mean, if you have half a brain. |
Sorry, half my brain was removed during a botched circumcision.
Would you mind explaining to me why it is so obvious to you that having a foreskin contributes to increased risk of STD's? |
|
|
| Palladium |
| quote: | Originally posted by Jase83
no no no, i meant your wang looks like a cancer patient without hair around it. not handsome at all.. looks like it's on death row with out the fuzz around it. lolz |
pheww
i support pubeless cocks & pussies 
this thread is now about pubes as well. GO! |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Sorry, half my brain was removed during a botched circumcision.
Would you mind explaining to me why it is so obvious to you that having a foreskin contributes to increased risk of STD's? |
Would you mind explaining to me what's so hard about actually reading the relatively brief news stories you feel compelled to comment on even though it's abundantly clear you're not quite sure what you're on about?
:conf: |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Sorry, half my brain was removed during a botched circumcision.
Would you mind explaining to me why it is so obvious to you that having a foreskin contributes to increased risk of STD's? |
Lol, are you playing stupid?
Haven't you ever seen foreskin? It creates the perfect environment for bacteria and other organisms to get trapped and survive.
There's plenty of evidence to support this. When I get some time I'll hunt down some articles. Lots of stuff in my nursing texts that supports this as well. |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Would you mind explaining to me what's so hard about actually reading the relatively brief news stories you feel compelled to comment on even though it's abundantly clear you're not quite sure what you're on about?
:conf: |
I'm sorry... what are you rambling on about? |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
I'm sorry... what are you rambling on about? |
Same as you, absolutely nothing. |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Is there any reason why a foreskin would pick up infection more than the open penis? |
Yes.
| quote: |
Biologic Plausibility
Compared with the dry external skin surface, the inner mucosa of the foreskin has less keratinization (deposition of fibrous protein), a higher density of target cells for HIV infection (Langerhans cells), and is more susceptible to HIV infection than other penile tissue in laboratory studies [2]. The foreskin may also have greater susceptibility to traumatic epithelial disruptions (tears) during intercourse, providing a portal of entry for pathogens, including HIV [3]. In addition, the microenvironment in the preputial sac between the unretracted foreskin and the glans penis may be conducive to viral survival [1]. Finally, the higher rates of sexually transmitted genital ulcerative disease, such as syphilis, observed in uncircumcised men may also increase susceptibility to HIV infection [4].
|
The source is the CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/fa...ircumcision.htm |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Same as you, absolutely nothing. |
We should be buddies :) |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
| Actually, that CDC page is a really good fact sheet. I have it bookmarked. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| I believe this is the part where Theresa is supposed to say "my bad." |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
I believe this is the part where Theresa is supposed to say "my bad." |
You're the one who is bad... and you know it. Don't be trying to pawn yo bad on me. |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
It's not just Theresa, it's most of humanity's prerogative to deny any kind of scientific study until they experience the phenomenon for themselves.
I understand this, being a climate scientist. |
|
|
|
|
