|
Dude I fvcking suck at making trance. (pg. 8)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| parafrNalia |
| Who is this "15 year old kid" and what times is he running? |
|
|
| Timothy |
| quote: | Originally posted by parafrNalia
Who is this "15 year old kid" and what times is he running? |
Usain Bolt, he holds the 100m and 200m world record. His latest 100m time is 9.57. He can go alot quicker though :eyes: |
|
|
| mysticalninja |
| Well of course genetics plays a role especially physically. Some people have to wear glasses. Some people have to read a book multiple times to retain the same information someone can retain after reading once. But if "IQ" or "musical talent" were inherited we would be breeding super babies with elite intellectual lineages. (No, this isn't happening, i don't believe in the illuminati.) |
|
|
| parafrNalia |
I was under the impression he was a little older. :p
I assume you are referring to when he was that age, and yeah... he was good, but he was always predominantly a 200m runner, and was never the best in the world.
He just randomly started throwing down ridiculous times one day.. lol. |
|
|
| Timothy |
| quote: | Originally posted by parafrNalia
I was under the impression he was a little older. :p
I assume you are referring to when he was that age, and yeah... he was good, but he was always predominantly a 200m runner, and was never the best in the world.
He just randomly started throwing down ridiculous times one day.. lol. |
Yeah he was a 200m runner who decided to do 100m to improve his starts for the 200m which was his biggest weakness due to his height. He's only raced 5 100m races in his life and holds an insane world record now.
He has always been very good when he was a kid. If you look at his 200m times when he was still very young, it's just really amazing. He even went under 20 seconds when he wasn't even 18 yet. |
|
|
| Timothy |
| quote: | Originally posted by mysticalninja
Well of course genetics plays a role especially physically. Some people have to wear glasses. Some people have to read a book multiple times to retain the same information someone can retain after reading once. But if "IQ" or "musical talent" were inherited we would be breeding super babies with elite intellectual lineages. (No, this isn't happening, i don't believe in the illuminati.) |
Then how come women are more poor at math than men?
Scientist still has to discover more than 90% of the human DNA. We still have got a long way to go to understand how humans works.
I'm not denying that hard work is not required if you got the talent, cause else the talent would be a waste. |
|
|
| music2dance2 |
mysticalninja - you have a good point on creativity & the environment around us but I believe you are wrong people cant have creativeness in them. A natural way about them for performing what ever the case maybe, some what without even trying to do it. Thats what talent is.
Theres no doubt this is eveident in people over the years, I dont care what books you've read or programs you've seen. Its plainly obvious to see by anyone. Yes being raised that way has something to do with it but many people have a natural give for things than others and succeed at a faster rate than others. Just my 2 cents |
|
|
| lenieNt Force |
| quote: | Originally posted by mysticalninja
There is no music gene. Creativity is learned. Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, they weren't born that way. They were raised that way. |
Ofcourse there is a thing called natural talent.. If it's a gene or not is irrelevant. The important thing is that it's inherited.. Spiritually or by DNA, irrelevant.. Music is a spiritual thing anyway.. So if it's in the genes me dunno.. Some people naturally have a lot of rythm in their body from childbirth, some don't. I don't need to put up any arguments at all.. Just do some research. I know for a fact that all the rythm I have in my body has very much to do with my parents and breed.. with my mother who was a pro swing dancer, with gypsy blood running through her veins.. my grandfather who was a famous spanish step dancer.. You don't know it has very much to do with that? I know I know.. I can feel it in my body. |
|
|
| parafrNalia |
| quote: | Originally posted by lenieNt Force
Ofcourse there is a thing called natural talent.. If it's a gene or not is irrelevant. The important thing is that it's inherited.. Spiritually or by DNA, irrelevant.. Music is a spiritual thing anyway.. So if it's in the genes me dunno.. Some people naturally have a lot of rythm in their body from childbirth, some don't. I don't need to put up any arguments at all.. Just do some research. I know for a fact that all the rythm I have in my body has very much to do with my parents and breed.. with my mother who was a pro swing dancer, and gypsy blood running through her veins.. my grandfather who was a famous spanish step dancer.. You don't know it has very much to do with that? I know I know.. I can feel it in my body. |
Spirit? That sounds like something a gypsy would say.
But really, that's just a subjective a a term as natural talent, if not more. :p |
|
|
| lenieNt Force |
| quote: | Originally posted by mysticalninja
Well of course genetics plays a role especially physically. Some people have to wear glasses. Some people have to read a book multiple times to retain the same information someone can retain after reading once. But if "IQ" or "musical talent" were inherited we would be breeding super babies with elite intellectual lineages. (No, this isn't happening, i don't believe in the illuminati.) |
So basically you believe that body and mind are separate. "IQ" is not inherited? How then do you explain why we can't teach a baby monkey to get as high IQ score as a baby human? Don't you think this has been studied and investigated at all? |
|
|
| Kismet7 |
There are pure artists who are born with the ability of translating their vision through their medium of choice. The talent is not so much a technical or mechanical talent, but rather their ability to use that medium to translate their ideas and vision. The medium is just a tool to express through.
However, with EDM music their is a strong technical and technology aspect to the success of the music. And this technical aspect can be learned like learning just about any multifaceted system. And in this area people with lesser musical ability can find success through repetoire and hard work.
If you are born with a talent + you take the time to figure out the technical aspects, then you will have an ever better shot at getting ahead. But again, a big part of EDM is the technical side, the average label owner is clueless about the musical or artistic content of music, a good mix is important. If you're not "born with it", go to a mixing school before music school, if you want to make EDM your musical future. |
|
|
| mysticalninja |
| quote: | | Ofcourse there is a thing called natural talent.. If it's a gene or not is irrelevant. The important thing is that it's inherited.. Spiritually or by DNA, irrelevant.. Music is a spiritual thing anyway.. So if it's in the genes me dunno.. Some people naturally have a lot of rythm in their body from childbirth, some don't. I don't need to put up any arguments at all.. Just do some research. I know for a fact that all the rythm I have in my body has very much to do with my parents and breed.. with my mother who was a pro swing dancer, and gypsy blood running through her veins.. my grandfather who was a famous spanish step dancer.. You don't know it has very much to do with that? I know I know.. I can feel it in my body. |
How do you inherent something spiritually? has that been studied and investigated? lol. I think it has alot more to do with you being raised in that enviorment. I don't think there is a rythm gene, talent gene, gay gene, criminal gene... that ignorance is what makes ignorant people say things like "australia's decended from a bunch of crooks and criminals, their all bad people" These things are NOT inherited. Do you think Native Americans have a natural incentive to do wig wam dances around fires too?
| quote: | Originally posted by lenieNt Force
So basically you believe that body and mind are separate. "IQ" is not inherited? How then do you explain why we can't teach a baby monkey to get as high IQ score as a baby human? Don't you think this has been studied and investigated at all? |
No, mind and body are not separate. I don't believe that human beings are empty vessels at all. There's powerful genetic elements to who we are, naturally. The difference between a human being and a monkey is obviously genetics. |
|
|
|
|
