|
So the police came out to speak with me again... (pg. 19)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
I agree. When I was into martial arts I had a mate who was into weapons that used to always swing sharp things in his backyard. None of his neighbours gave a . |
Until the day Fido ran away only to be found in seven different neighbourhoods :p |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
what ever happened to him? |
Kinda stopped hanging out with him after I wandered away from martial arts. But I would bet he's still very into it. He was into his Chinese weapons.. real trip down memory lane though.. the guy's probably married with kids by now :)
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Until the day Fido ran away only to be found in seven different neighbourhoods :p |
:stongue: I did have another friend whose pet huskie ran away and came back at night with a cat he'd killed.. had a little collar and tag on and everything. They ended up burying it quietly in the backyard lol |
|
|
| ziptnf |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rose
I'm thinking about posting that PM ******** sent me explaining something about hypnosis sex or something like that. |
Either you post it, or you'll PM me and I'll post it :stongue: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
The main thing is what public is alarmed about this? The police investigated this even prior to me posting this thread, and no one person contacted me stating, you scared me when you said ... I thought you may...
not one actual person has identified themselves, police have stated multiple times there is no breach of the law. They've repeatedly asked me do I plan on killing someone - so frankly unless there is someone out there that thinks I'm going to kill them or some other real person, this is more like.
OMG that person is out waving a sword around, they could kill someone.
But all they are seeing is a sword and a person waving it around slashing at the air.
That person doesn't take the time to determine why, nor are they personally nor anyone they know or can see being threatened.. yet still that person piddles down the side of their leg.
While this would be causing public alarm, that person to sulk away and contact the cops rather than see the person is just researching swordplay, is taking things out of context.
There are just some serious prudes out there that are sissyfied.
Don't look in their backyard if you don't want to see their sword.
If you don't know what is going on jumping to false conclusions and wasting other peoples time and money over it is irresponsible, get real evidence and information someone is at risk before you paint the picture that is totally fantasy. |
every single person who has posted in this thread disagrees with you. everyone. who is the one with the problem- everyone else, or you? |
|
|
| Domesticated |
| quote: | Originally posted by d-miurge
I really think that ******** suffers from SPD. |
You know, I think you're right. He seems to match all the symptoms.
Ideas of reference (excluding delusions of reference)
Odd beliefs or magical thinking that influences behavior and is inconsistent with subcultural norms (e.g., superstitiousness, bizarre fantasies or preoccupations)
Unusual perceptual experiences, including bodily illusions
Odd thinking and speech (e.g., vague, circumstantial, metaphorical, overelaborate, or stereotyped)
Suspiciousness or paranoid ideation
Inappropriate or constricted affect
Behavior or appearance that is odd, eccentric, or peculiar
Lack of close friends or confidants other than first-degree relatives
Social anxiety that tends to be associated with paranoid fears rather than negative judgments about self
Stuff like this:
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
I'm circumsized not a shmuck. |
Seems to match up with 'odd thinking and speech'. Someone calls him a schmuck, and rather than taking it by the usual meaning, he takes it by the literal meaning (I assume it means someone with foreskin intact?).
Same here:
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
I've contacted police about public use of swords, and it is ok as long as it is not to cause alarm to the public, atleast in waterloo, from what the officer explained. Groups like SCA, medievalists, and other grounds exist in which this would occur. |
Astroboy cites an example as to why you can't wave a sword in the street and he takes it literally. He doesn't seem to understand hypothetical or metaphorical situations.
But...
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I'm going to have to agree. I think you're actually a pretty ing smart guy, William. Your posts are insightful and precise, if not a bit errant and incoherent at times. |
I agree with that, he is intelligent; his strange social skills just mask it. I also agree with this:
| quote: | Originally posted by SuspicionVandit
people who have psychiatric treatment history tend to be treated differently when involved in otherwise normal encounters with authority. While ******** may be preemptively (and overly) paranoid of certain figures around him, it's most likely not without recorded incidents. |
I don't doubt that ******** is paranoid and overly suspicious of law enforcement, but I DO believe he has suffered uneccessarily at their hands in the past, and probably for little reason.
Finally, this:
| quote: | Originally posted by noikeee
Stop antagonising him, I don't want him to flip up because of TA. |
Yes, yes a million times yes. The guy is obviously harmless and I think the constant mocking on here is detrimental to his mental health. Like elFreak/whateverotherbillionaltshehasnow , I like to stir the pot, but there are times when you can just go too far and cause harm. This is one of those times. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| I dunno...when somebody posts about "they want a killer, they got one", I don't take that lightly. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Domesticated
I like to stir the pot, but there are times when you can just go too far and cause harm. This is one of those times. |
pfft. load me up with gelignite and tell me where the party is. |
|
|
| Nerologic |
Ummmmmmmmmmm
I just wnet through most of the pages on this thread, but didn't find the whole context of his bio.
Anyone care to post the whole context of his bio?
The excerpts that have been quoted are riveting, i would like to see the whole writeup he wrote.
kthnxbye |
|
|
| Banora |
| :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| Nerologic |
| quote: | [i][b]I'd caution anyone that posts would be in violation of my copyright and subject to vicious CIAA legal action. And you know what they do to copyright infringers these days.
Anyone seeking to use or redistribute my owned intellectual content should contact myself at [email protected] for disclosure and use allowance permissions.
Material posted on my website while usable for personal consumption from source is not for redistribution or any unauthorized use without my express permission, unless content has multiple ownership/control in which case all owners/controllers would require to grant permission for any use not casual to browsing the aforesaid content. You have been warned.
W. Ashley July 29th 2009 x. williamashley.info
---In whole or part. |
So wait, can you sue me now since i quoted your post?
BTW someone emailed me the script. |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
I'd caution anyone that posts would be in violation of my copyright and subject to vicious CIAA legal action. And you know what they do to copyright infringers these days.
Anyone seeking to use or redistribute my owned intellectual content should contact myself at [email protected] for disclosure and use allowance permissions.
Material posted on my website while usable for personal consumption from source is not for redistribution or any unauthorized use without my express permission, unless content has multiple ownership/control in which case all owners/controllers would require to grant permission for any use not casual to browsing the aforesaid content. You have been warned.
W. Ashley July 29th 2009 x. williamashley.info
---In whole or part. |
You crazy . |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: |
currently I am anything but Conservative.The CPC has pissed me off big time over the last year with false projection after false projection, and inane spending habits and employment control agendas. The monstrous blunders with economic management destabalized Canada long term viability and if not for the increasingly foreign owned resource sector Canada would be in a lot more hurt. Of course i love the high dollar, but exporters likely don't.
This all started with things like the "40 billion mortage buyout" in what was deemed releif of toxic assets from the banks which were stable and healthy in Canada. The government needs and should have kept a hands off approach to the private sector, and should not be handing out billions of dollars to any company, that is a form of embezzlement of tax payer dollars. This has progressed with big spending on infrastructure renewal, what gets me on this is spending on roads that are sufficient. Although I think some economic investment can be good, I think some of it can be very wasteful and the two need to be taken into perspect.
If 2 Billion in bad spending was taken into account then the EI issue woulnd't even exist. If those people on EI were put to direct employment in gainful sectors of the economy rather than wasteful non derivitive works projects, even if as simple as urban gardens, solar and energy sector assembly then it wouldn't be quite as wasteful. Works projects like roadways which arn't in bad shape is completely negligent. While true it is only a few million here and a few million there it adds up. Canada has too many roads, it doesn't need new ones, and its not like this is "stimulating spending" It is doing stuff that should be done anyway.
What gets me the most on this is that in order to pay for this, the CBC, the Canadian Mint and the other few Crown Corporations that remain are being tabled to be sold off. Yet these are some of the corporations that could be competitive and income generating. That is the problem with government as of late, they arn't about making a working government they are about making government less capable and privatizing government resources, public resources, and in large part to US companies, and other foreign citizens. It is not only the axing of public Canada but inception of foreign stakeholding of Canadian resources
Somehow the NeoCon government has spent billions on a pointless war as far from Canada as you can get, with no strategic objective other than to topple a unstable land locked country in the middle of Asia. None the less I will not be voting conservative this election. Although the party aside from being filled with seeminly obnoxious s, with pretty boy mentalities are a pretty good evil government, and while generally nice I really really really hope they go to opposition or third or fourth party status, one cannot expect a return to the 1990's PC results.
Sad fact is I also think Ignatieff is 99% show, and it irritates me, also he is the most conservative liberal around. The liberal party which has continuously been the "other party" or the party, in terms of Government for all of Canadian history is filled with business people/bankers etc.. much like the CPC, they are a political party. So there is that real, does the party really plan to do anything different than the Tories? I think to a certain extent this may be true but I can only hope it means a more open vision. But it just appears friendlier, but I could be sadly mistaken, you know less rascist and spiteful, but I have no clue.
BLOC NDP? Well NDP does seem on an upswing, one must wonder if they will be able to hold onto their pants or pantsie someone else. While I generally feel the NDP is really about enhancing the life of the average Canadian middle or low income person, I also tend to think that the elitists will bitch and moan if they ever formed a goverment to the point that Canada would be transformed into a G20 country due to the mass exodus of every person earning more than $80,000/year. But this is likely just convoluted nonsense. They don't get a lot of media coverage. The bloc - can't vote for them anyway.
I started my own party though 10 years ago. It is still not an official party (surpise suprise), still broke, and still only one candidate err well almost Candidate since, we are still broke, and it costs about $4000 to run in the election.
None the less if I voted, which I don't, I think my voting would go like this BLOC-NDP-GREEN-LIBERALS-EVERY OTHER PARTY-KILLMYSSELF-CONSERVATIVES PS I don't really dislike the Liberals that much I consider them the alternative to the Conservatives, but since I was tortured and completely ing insulted to the point of open rebellion, and founding a new state, and denouncing my citizenship due to their ignorance, inaction and support for a war while purporting totalitarian and unconstitutional legislation, I'm still a little put off by the party itself. But alas I must at some point recognize that politics and justice are not necisarily unitary, even if the judicial posts are all politically appointed. That being said I don't vote because I'm not engaged, nor do any of the policies that matter to me get put on the agenda of the parties, except potentially the bloc, I think Quebec should be cut loose in some form, this will shut them up and make them happy. If only national divorce was treated the same was a civil divorce Quebecers would maybe be more faithful. Really though I think it will actually stimulate both economies and enhance the regional powerbase by creating a new state, new seat at the UN, new WTO partners, etc.. etc.. especially with the voting block that is the EU, although maybe Quebec would just be an EU satalite.
One thing I never learned was to shut up, and it has me on the path to complete and utter destitution, even though I've almsot been there before. I'm old now I'm not going back to the womb, I'm on my own. I don't want to live anywhere, I don't want to stay, I dislike so many people. Fact is I have an ongoing sense of apathy due to being abused by people so many ing times. I've never actually consciously acted to ever hurt anyone, or do anything to attack anyone for who they were. Although I have attacked actions that I don't agree with, which personally effect me. None the less I feel like someone who has been personally attacked by people for years upon years. I'm not about to go out and be the next jack the ripper but I'm not going to struggle against these forces, if people are out to destroy me it is their own death blow, I've only ever sought to help people and make life better for people to live in this world. It is just unfortunate values are so different, as to create conflict. It really is still the hardfact that the world is totalitarian and cult oriented. The individual is subjected to social order by means of force as necesary. There is no independent freedom granted, there is no allowance of free expression, it is a police state. But lets see the progression of my thought from now to 5 years ago. 5 years ago I beleived this also, the difference now is, that I have experienced it now.
1. I am not likely to get a job.
4. There is an ongoing sense of deprivation of free of oppression, by some individuals.
I learned over these 5 years not to take it, what I learned is ATTACK KILL DESTROY because that is what they will do to you and your values. This is coming.
# I've had my education destroyed.
# I've been evicted from my home.
# I've been forced from the radio station I volunteered at.
# I've been ignored by the TV station I volunteered at.
# No one expresses interest in hiring me.
Fact is, the jig is up. And it is futility. I tried, I was complacent, and I was cooperative. End result insult, injustice, personal attacks.
We are just trying to make a life for ourself, to live, in peace, and some sense of enjoyment, and sense of liberty, in some sense of normalcy. That has time and time proven to be an imposibility. although my personal political beleifs and my party political beliefs shoulnd't be construed to mean the same thing, see also my party beliefs - which are more socially oriented proactive Social Party |
i'll quote that under "fair use" guidelines which say " you" to ********'s supposed copyright. |
|
|
|
|
