return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Trance is dead(free sticks available for poking) (pg. 3)
View this Thread in Original format
Kysora
People complaining about trance not focusing on percussion is completely asinine. Most producers don't focus on the perucssion because most listeners give it the same attention. As long as it serves as a formation for the bassline, the hooks, the overall sound, then there's no reason to go further than that. Though plenty producers still do.

And yeah, trance is, IMO, better than it's ever been. The sound's changed for the most part but it's up to personal opinion as to whether or not it's better or worse, but musically trance has been doing some amazing things if you look beyond ASOT or the top 100 garbage.

Also, Oceanlab is the only vocal trance you'll need.
Nightshift
quote:
Originally posted by Kysora
People complaining about trance not focusing on percussion is completely asinine. Most producers don't focus on the perucssion because most listeners give it the same attention. As long as it serves as a formation for the bassline, the hooks, the overall sound, then there's no reason to go further than that. Though plenty producers still do.

And yeah, trance is, IMO, better than it's ever been. The sound's changed for the most part but it's up to personal opinion as to whether or not it's better or worse, but musically trance has been doing some amazing things if you look beyond ASOT or the top 100 garbage.

Also, Oceanlab is the only vocal trance you'll need.


^^THIS GUY knows whats up.

p.s. GDJB > ASOT all day every day.
MrJiveBoJingles
Vocals are one thing trance does not need more of.
Beatflux
quote:
Originally posted by dj_alfi
welcome to the club


Thank you. Where's my damn welcome basket?

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
So is there an era of trance you do like, or are your tastes simply moving away from all trance entirely?

I would not call simple repetitive melodies a flaw, since trance is all about hypnotizing the listeners -- which is why it is called "trance" after all -- and making them dance.


Entirely.

I don't mind simple melodies or even repeated melodies. But when you have both, it's quantized and the timbre is sterile it adds up to be a very boring experience.

The essence of any kind of trance inducing music is slow subtle changes. Maybe it's an accent change that totally changes the rhythm of the melody, but it's the same melody. That example is much more subtle than most changes in modern trance that are additions.

quote:
Originally posted by owien
well this topic kinda brings me to my point in dj robby thred last week about people making there own rather then using the same tired sounds.


It's sad that it's come down to varying timbres than any other sort of musical aspect.
Kysora
Agreed, vocals can only do so much for a track, most producers make the song around them an afterthought and you get stuck with nothing but a basic bassline or chord progression that, on its own, would be completely uninteresting.

Big Sky is still a guilty pleasure of mine, though
Nightshift
lol Big Sky, heard SVD play that song live and still wasnt impressed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3Dx_zEyXaA
Beatflux
quote:
Originally posted by Kysora

Big Sky is still a guilty pleasure of mine, though


Why should you feel guilty about it? Because everyone thinks it's cheese?
palm
problem with monotonic, repeatative music made on computers is that it has no personality. if u repeat a loop over and over again on a hardware sampler ull start to hear the machines inner ghosts, but that just dont happen with software, its just the same synthetic sound without any change, on hardware it changes with temperature, how long it has been on with power and at what volume it is played on.
MrJiveBoJingles
Digital hardware is not going to change sound unless it actually starts breaking. It is 1s and 0s just like any computer.

:p
Nightshift
lol and hardware vs software is just around the bend...once again...

nrjizer
Simon Berry would disagree:

Union Jack - Papillon
palm
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Digital hardware is not going to change sound unless it actually starts breaking. It is 1s and 0s just like any computer.

:p


not true, take the AKAI S1000, a digital sampler which is known for its inner various ghosts making loops more alive and never boring.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Privacy Statement