return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 
History of Trance Music Book Released (pg. 4)
View this Thread in Original format
lacedpills
Can you dedicate a section to the year 1999? It has to be one of the most celebrated years in teance music.
Quazar
I'd read a book about trance by System J, for sure. He could at least write about the Dutch-and-beyond era without being condescending.

Just don't let Ishkur write it.
Sykonee
quote:
Originally posted by Quazar
I'd read a book about trance by System J, for sure. He could at least write about the Dutch-and-beyond era without being condescending

I seriously doubt that. Reviewing Anjunabeats mixes turned him incredibly sour to that whole scene. :p

(unless, of course, you grease his palms enough to make him go all proper Simon Reynolds :gsmile: )
Lews
The Kaleidoscope review is still one of the best piece about music I've ever read. The recommended tracks part was just the icing on the cake :stongue:
dj christian
What we all could agree on is that trance hasn't aged very well.
Mr Game+Watch
quote:
Originally posted by Sykonee
Kickstart that . :p


My thoughts exactly, I'd chip in some bucks.
lollerskates
quote:
Originally posted by Lews
The Kaleidoscope review is still one of the best piece about music I've ever read. The recommended tracks part was just the icing on the cake :stongue:

Link so we can enjoy? :D
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by lollerskates
Link so we can enjoy? :D


Hopefully this works:

http://web.archive.org/web/20120303...op=show&rid=478
Light The Fuse
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Hopefully this works:

http://web.archive.org/web/20120303...op=show&rid=478


lol
HOUSE ISLAND
>Can you dedicate a section to the year 1999? It has to be one of the >most celebrated years in teance music.

This is possible, but can you elaborate on why that year specifically? Sec 2.3 refers to 1999, but not specifically that year.

>What we all could agree on is that trance hasn't aged very well.

Christian..agreed, the book elaborates on that fact. There seems to be some negativity brewing.

The book is a general overview written for educators, libraries, institutions etc., and the general public to give a true and accurate historical timeline of the term "trance music". We are a group of adults now educating students on the EDM scene, not here to create genre wars.

It wasn't intended to aggravate trance followers. In fact if System J claims he is a qualified historian, then we may have an opportunity for him to get his voice heard, and make money at the same time. If anyone has any objections to the statements in the book, we only ask that you explain why, and cite a reference or your own explanation to back up your claim. Simply saying "the book is a joke", or "the book sucks", and "its not true", means very little if you can't back up exact errors, and allow those errors to be discussed by both angles.

Santiago will log in here next week, and if anyone wants to pick his brain, feel free.

N.B.

Lews
quote:
Originally posted by HOUSE ISLAND
>Can you dedicate a section to the year 1999? It has to be one of the >most celebrated years in teance music.

This is possible, but can you elaborate on why that year specifically? Sec 2.3 refers to 1999, but not specifically that year.


Wut.

quote:
Originally posted by HOUSE ISLAND
If anyone has any objections to the statements in the book, we only ask that you explain why, and cite a reference or your own explanation to back up your claim. Simply saying "the book is a joke", or "the book sucks", and "its not true", means very little if you can't back up exact errors, and allow those errors to be discussed by both angles.


You asking us for documentation is rich :stongue:
HOUSE ISLAND
Hi Lews. Supplying some explanation as to why you are so upset is only fair, wouldn't you think?

Your voice can be heard too.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 
Privacy Statement