Originally posted by Spacey Orange
that is rich, coming from someone who spends countless hours playing video games.
you’re dumb :haha:
IM not the one crying a river over the evils of the world and how I wish everything was different and sunshine and rainbows (whilst displaying a distinct lack of experience, knowledge and expertise over said evils). I on the other hand have a reasonable grasp of various issues because im a not an inbred imbecile. this is despite the ridiculous amount of hours I waste playing videogames.
so, basically for your comment to be relevant you would need me to
a) cry a river over stupid things
b) have absolutely no clue; and
c) rally against The Man on tranceaddict.
hence your retort is stupid and you should feel bad.
Nrg2Nfinit
or
d) cast haste
Marcus Summers
Jews are responsible for this whole mess and are pulling the strings.
The worst part about this is honestly how insufferable it's made libertarians.
srussell0018
We've already had employees coming to us paranoid that we're giving all of their email to the NSA. ing idiots, wouldn't you think that if they're concerned about the content of their emails they'd realize that we already have access to them, and they'd most likely be fired before they'd be investigated by the NSA for any reason whatsoever.
OrangestO
So, are you going to buy a Patriot Tim Tebow jersey or not?
Halcyon+On+On
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
shut the up, hal!
Hey, what the ?! Where was I wh- Oh.
Halcyon+On+On
It's not a constitutional violation because the data seized is owned by the companies that traffic it for you as a service; Verizon, in this case, but also Comcast, Century Link, AT&T, etc. They own everything that happens over their networks, you sign all of that 'property' over to them when you consent to make use of their equipment, no matter how personally it pertains to you. So when the NSA or the FBI or the CIA approach one of these companies and basically ask for a peek into their feed, why wouldn't they immediately consent in order to avoid all possible injunction? They are corporations with everything to gain from compliance with the Federal Government, and no particularly obligate constitutional rights, themselves, because corporations aren't... people... UH.
