|
Pentagon hit by a missile? (pg. 14)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| culorut |
| quote: | | and im still waiting for any of you to explain what happened to the ing plane come on kids. you must have something! |
You must the dumbest motherf**ker ever.
Why don't you show us the plane hitting the pentagon since it is the government who said so in the first place.
Oh wait you can't, no AA77 in that video. |
|
|
| Shakka |
| I'm starting to think this thread should be deported to the COR. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You must the dumbest motherf**ker ever.
Why don't you show us the plane hitting the pentagon since it is the government who said so in the first place.
Oh wait you can't, no AA77 in that video. |
do you understand ANYTHING about argument or logic? YOU are the one going against generally accepted facts, facts that have been generated by expert investigation. the onus is on YOU, if you are disputing the facts, to provide plausible alternatives to what the crash investigators found.
its laughable for you dismiss all the evidence from the crash site (plane pieces, plane super structure, personal effects, the dead bodies identified by DNA etc) by postulating the "no plane theory", without having ANY argument for what really happened to it . you love to talk about supposed "official story" contradictions, yet you're too stupid to realise that not having a theory for where the plane really went is such a massive problem for your argument it renders it completely ridiculous.
get an education child and learn how to structure arguments properly. its pathetic. |
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You must the dumbest motherf**ker ever.
Why don't you show us the plane hitting the pentagon since it is the government who said so in the first place.
Oh wait you can't, no AA77 in that video. |
the burden of proof is on you actually.
we have overwhelming evidence of American Airlines FLT-77 crashing into one of the largest buildings in the world and in a court of law, you'd be -out-of-luck proving otherwise.
did you know that 99% of all felony convictions in the US are done without any video evidence?
so who's dumb again? |
|
|
| Q5echo |
 |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| why is it a pentagon anyway... |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
do you understand ANYTHING about argument or logic? YOU are the one going against generally accepted facts, facts that have been generated by expert investigation. the onus is on YOU, if you are disputing the facts, to provide plausible alternatives to what the crash investigators found.
its laughable for you dismiss all the evidence from the crash site (plane pieces, plane super structure, personal effects, the dead bodies identified by DNA etc) by postulating the "no plane theory", without having ANY argument for what really happened to it . you love to talk about supposed "official story" contradictions, yet you're too stupid to realise that not having a theory for where the plane really went is such a massive problem for your argument it renders it completely ridiculous.
get an education child and learn how to structure arguments properly. its pathetic. |
Show us AA77 hitting the pentagon and I will believe you. Come on you can do it. |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Show us AA77 hitting the pentagon and I will believe you. Come on you can do it. |
So either you're mentally retarded or you are just a troll. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | So either you're mentally retarded or you are just a troll. |
No PKC assumes both those roles. |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sunsnail
why is it a pentagon anyway... |
cuz the devil lives in the basement.;)
| quote: | | Its unusual shape results from the fact that its originally intended site, Arlington Farms, fronted on Arlington Ridge Road and the Arlington Memorial Bridge approach, which intersected at an angle of approximately 108 degrees (the angle of a regular pentagon).[4] President Franklin D. Roosevelt had it constructed at its current location because he didn't want the new building to obstruct the view of Washington, D.C. from Arlington Cemetery,[5] but the building retained its pentagonal shape because a major redesign at that stage would have been costly and because Roosevelt liked the design. Freed of the constraints of the asymmetric Arlington Farms site, however, it was modified into a regular pentagon.[6] |
|
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Show us AA77 hitting the pentagon and I will believe you. Come on you can do it. |
i dont need to show the plane hitting the pentagon. i just have to point at the hundreds of witnesses, the crash debris, the identified dead bodies from flight 77, the personal effects recovered, the fact that this plane has disappeared.
but keep up on it internet detective! you and your buddies are infinitely more able to realise there was no crash than any of the dozens of investigators that combed the scene. oh no! thats right! they were from the government *cue spooky music*
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
No PKC assumes both those roles. |
ive been stomping the idiots in these 911 threads well before you even joined TA child.
but keep it up with your disingenuous responses to proper questions. your movement is full of similar tactics. |
|
|
| Omega_M |
| do you guys know any website where they have challenged the conspiracy theory claims that no engine or plane parts of the size of a 757 were found at the crash scene ? I would be interested to read it. |
|
|
|
|
