|
Pentagon hit by a missile? (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Magnetonium
Trancer-X, that Yahoo article is the bomb. I mass-emailed it to all my friends. Definitely a big shatter in the arse to all the pro-government anti-conspiracy people on this forum ;-) black boxes cannot lie ;-) there was no doubt for me since Day 1 that there was no Boeing 747 hitting the Pentagon, it didnt make any sense. But 6 years later them releasing this revered black box, which makes little difference now because all the mistakes have been made as a result (Iraq War). If only they weren't such liars back then and released all info and noone else would've had to die. So many innocent people and civilians had to die as a result of this terrible US leadeship. |
Yeah, I'm right there with you, Phil.
And I wouldn't call it leadership, I'd call it misleadership because what they're doing is misleading us Americans like we've never been misled before! |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
From YouTube:
Within a month of 9/11, NYC fire commissioner Thomas Von Essen, a 30-year NYFD vet, set up interviews with fire, port authority police and EMT first responders to record their initial impressions of what they experienced on Sept 11.
The stories of 503 men and women ran to 12,000 pages. Graeme MacQueen, a recently retired religious studies professor, read them all. In addition to the heartrending nature of many of the stories, the consistent theme was of hearing, feeling and seeing explosions, a controlled demolition. Failure to officially acknowledge this evidence is further proof of an inside job. MacQueen (McMaster University, Ontario, Canada) narrowed down the testimony of 118 first responders as especially court-worthy testimony. But he notes the entire testimony was excluded by the 9/11 Commission, as well as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). [Part 1 of 2; Part 2: First Responders Testimony] Video prepared for the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, June 22-24, 2007 / snowshoefilms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwQa5eokieY |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by jonSun
:wtf: I never knew that vid was released. Or is that a fake? There is no 757 in the footage hitting the pentagon. |
it's from Judicial Watch
link |
|
|
| Shakka |
2 obvious misconceptions:
1) People assume that there are billions of video cameras, always on, always capturing footage of every single event that happens everywhere at all times. How come we don't have HD footage of this event happening??? Christ, if there were really a conspiracy, wouldn't there be some secret agents out there filming this? Was the lighting off? Who was in charge of the choreography? Why isn't there any footage of me taking a dump this morning? Surely someone must've had a camera pointed at me! Bleh--GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY!
2) If I read it on the Internet it must be true. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
2 obvious misconceptions:
1) People assume that there are billions of video cameras, always on, always capturing footage of every single event that happens everywhere at all times. How come we don't have HD footage of this event happening??? Christ, if there were really a conspiracy, wouldn't there be some secret agents out there filming this? Was the lighting off? Who was in charge of the choreography? Why isn't there any footage of me taking a dump this morning? Surely someone must've had a camera pointed at me! Bleh--GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY!
2) If I read it on the Internet it must be true. |
You're going to have to come up with something more intelligent and more poignant than that if you're going to try and mislead people away from the truth.
Judicial Watch is wholly legitimate. I'm assuming that you're just too lazy to look it up. Either that or seeking the truth is not very high on your agenda.
From their website:
About Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch Staff at the Supreme Court
Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations and public outreach.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/about.shtml |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
You're going to have to come up with something more intelligent and more poignant than that if you're going to try and mislead people away from the truth.
Judicial Watch is wholly legitimate. I'm assuming that you're just too lazy to look it up. Either that or seeking the truth is not very high on your agenda.
From their website:
About Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch Staff at the Supreme Court
Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through its educational endeavors, Judicial Watch advocates high standards of ethics and morality in our nation’s public life and seeks to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Judicial Watch fulfills its educational mission through litigation, investigations and public outreach.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/about.shtml |
Uhm, OK pal. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
Uhm, OK pal. |
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Baaaaa Baaaaa
sorry but I couldn't resist |
|
|
| Shakka |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Baaaaa Baaaaa
sorry but I couldn't resist |
So can you explain my post from last night?
| quote: | Originally posted by me
So what praytell happened to all of the people who were aboard American Airlines flight 77? I'm sure their families would like to know why they never came home. Being directly related to someone who was actually IN the Pentagon when it was hit, lived to tell about it and saw physical evidence of plane wreckage on the lawn, I have a very difficult time swallowing the conspiracy pill. Additionally, personally knowing someone who was in D.C. and gave an eyewitness account of actually seeing an airplane fly into the building, I'm not ready to put any stock in a crudely concocted conspiracy theory. If the goal of this government was to gain unfettered permission to wage a pre-emptive war on whomever they desired, why in God's name would they attack the cerebral cortex of the very military they would be dependent on to do so? Call me a kook if you must. |
|
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
So can you explain my post from last night? |
I don't want to speculate on something which I haven't fully researched. I just know that it's kind of odd that all of the planes were only carrying about 1/4 of their normal passenger load.
I also know that the lawn was clean and blemish free right after *whatever it was* hit the Pentagon.
People are even making parody websites about it...
The Amazing Penta-Lawn |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| Why did the Nazi's set the Reichstag on fire? If you can you explain that you can probably answer your own question, Shakka ;) |
|
|
| Shakka |
| I didn't think so. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I didn't think so. |
Well, if I had ALL of the answers I would have written a book on it by now. :p |
|
|
|
|
