|
Pentagon hit by a missile? (pg. 18)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| culorut |
| quote: | | Actually, call me crazy, but I'd say that looks suspiciously like the tail of an airplane. You guys are making this waaaay too easy. |
Yes easy to pinpoint that it is not AA77.
Care to explain what the anomaly is at 1:44 then? It's not the nose of AA77 thats for sure. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
Actually, call me crazy, but I'd say that looks suspiciously like the tail of an airplane. You guys are making this waaaay too easy.
 |
if that really was the tail of the alleged plane then that means that the engines would have been dragging on the ground, leaving furrows which are in fact nonexistent. |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
A 747 is the biggest plane that Boeing makes next to the 787, which isn't slated for official release until 7/8/2007.
|
the 747-8 still has the largest wing span by far, though.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/74...fact_sheet.html |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
 |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| there you go it's a plane not a missle. |
|
|
| Magnetonium |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
there you go it's a plane not a missle. |
Commercial airlines dont leave chemtrails at 100 ft above ground now, do they? :haha: |
|
|
| Trancer-X |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
there you go it's a plane not a missle. |
Consideringthe bulk of the evidence that suggests otherwise, I seriously doubt that it could have been a 757. |
|
|
| Shakka |
| I don't know what "bulk" of evidence you're speaking of other than a lack of HD video shot from 18 different angles. I will ask one final time: If AA77 did not hit the Pentagon, WHERE DID THE PLANE GO AND WHERE ARE ALL OF THE PASSENGERS??? Until you can provide a satisfactory, definitive answer to that question you are doing nothing more than chasing a ghost fueled by some deep-seeded resentment towards the government or Bush or both. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I don't know what "bulk" of evidence you're speaking of other than a lack of HD video shot from 18 different angles. I will ask one final time: If AA77 did not hit the Pentagon, WHERE DID THE PLANE GO AND WHERE ARE ALL OF THE PASSENGERS??? Until you can provide a satisfactory, definitive answer to that question you are doing nothing more than chasing a ghost fueled by some deep-seeded resentment towards the government or Bush or both. |
Everything suggests that the plane did not hit the pentagon, from the flight data recorder to the last grainy frames of the video released. You are using "where is the plane and passengers" as a scape goat as you now have been proven wrong.
Bulk of evidence, look no further.
|
|
|
| Q5echo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancer-X
Consideringthe bulk of the evidence that suggests otherwise, I seriously doubt that it could have been a 757. |
what bulk? if you have a "bulk" then i've got a 100,000 sq/ft warehouse full, literally.
if you believe there really is a "bulk" and are convinced of that, you'd think you'd be certain as opposed to doubtfull.
how the hell can you convince anybody to be as conclusive as you when you are only "doubtfull"?
it's absurd how you carry on. not just on the facts of the matter but the manner in which you expect others to believe.
i don't think you really believe what you say. |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| A missing plane and passengers is actually a big issue, not just a minor detail that can be overlooked. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | A missing plane and passengers is actually a big issue, not just a minor detail that can be overlooked. |
Which is exactly why this being just one of the very big reasons that a 911 truth movement exists.
Pilots have examined the flight recorder data, interviewed police officers which work at the pentagon, called the NTSB and the FBI for clarification (and sent in circles).
Maybe if they would release a proper video and answer the questions from the flight recorder then we might be able to move forward a little more.
As it stands you have an official account on paper stating the flight did hit and they matched DNA samples from the victims, this is not fact until they release the footage and explain what knocked down the light poles since the data recorder and the witnesses (police officers) have stated otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
