|
Don't worry baby, I'm on the Pill (pg. 14)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| FunkyCrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by _EuG_
go to page 11 and read the research done about the pull out method |
i dont need to read anything
pull out=not reliable
not realiable=not happening
condoms and/or pill=reliable
as simple as that.
my close friend from back home had used a pull-out method with NO other means of protecting herself for about 4-5 years, then it failed
now she can't look at pregnant girls without crying (she went through an abortion)
this one story alone is enough for me not to even consider listening to ANY guy, partner in bed or partner in a conversation, talking about how good pull-out method is. |
|
|
| _EuG_ |
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkyCrew
i dont need to read anything
pull out=not reliable
not realiable=not happening
condoms and/or pill=reliable
as simple as that.
my close friend from back home has used a pull-out method with NO other means of protecting herself for about 4-5 years, then it failed
now she can't look at pregnant girls without crying (she went through an abortion) |
a girl is not in control when the pull out method is in effect. What if u knew someone who got pregnet from condom use, i mean there is that 2% chance right... would u never use a condom again? |
|
|
| FunkyCrew |
| quote: | Originally posted by _EuG_
a girl is not in control when the pull out method is in effect. What if u knew someone who got pregnet from condom use, i mean there is that 2% chance right... would u never use a condom again? |
never heard of that happening. |
|
|
| _EuG_ |
| i cant believe this thing is 14 pages already... |
|
|
| Xavier Moriarty |
id never take anything that | quote: | | interferes with the process |
.
any kind of a process.
there's better ways than taking something that can be | quote: | | too toxic to be a suitable contraceptive because it caused liver inflammation and muscle shrinkage (atrophy) |
"interferes", "inflammation" and "shrinkage" arent word that sound too trusting. |
|
|
| nusty |
| quote: | Originally posted by _EuG_
im in university and wikipedia has been a GREAT source over the years.. of course it cant be ur only source but it is very useful, and ihavent had problems with it at all. Besides all the claims on there are from studies that are referenced at the bottome |
first of all you're wikidpedia crap is not confirmed by any thrid party. second of all do you really trust a publication on preventing pregnancy from a publication titled "The Art of Natural Family Planning," because that was the second source from your source.
Third of all even you misquoted wikidpedia... the link you provided blatently says the average failure rate ranged from 15% to 28% with your method. That's potentially as risky as getting someone pregnant almost one out of every 3 times you have sex.
My point is that Wikidpedia is not a valid reffernce link unless you back it up with other academic publications. I don't know what your major is but no upper level prof with half a brain in any arts or science program should accept wikidpedia sources as factual unless backed up. |
|
|
| _EuG_ |
| quote: | Originally posted by nusty
first of all you're wikidpedia crap is not confirmed by any thrid party. second of all do you really trust a publication on preventing pregnancy from a publication titled "The Art of Natural Family Planning," because that was the second source from your source.
Third of all even you misquoted wikidpedia... the link you provided blatently says the average failure rate ranged from 15% to 28% with your method. That's potentially as risky as getting someone pregnant almost one out of every 3 times you have sex.
My point is that Wikidpedia is not a valid reffernce link unless you back it up with other academic publications. I don't know what your major is but no upper level prof with half a brain in any arts or science program should accept wikidpedia sources as factual unless backed up. |
it says that 15% - 28 % is for couples that dont know how to use it properly... couples that dont know how to use condoms propely have a 10 % - 18% risk as well..
its all in there |
|
|
| nusty |
| quote: | Originally posted by _EuG_
and of course school (the governemnt) is pushing condom use.. Condoms cost money, money = taxes, taxes = good for the government. |
because treating std related illnesses and having abortions/dealing with unwanted children in a publically funded health care system is cheap? |
|
|
| nusty |
| quote: | Originally posted by _EuG_
it says that 15% - 28 % is for couples that dont know how to use it properly... couples that dont know how to use condoms propely have a 10 % - 18% risk as well..
its all in there |
porn stars are about the only ones with the right technique for pulling out.
I highly doubt many males under age 28 have a very good gadge of themselves in the same regard.... sorry no wikidpedia source to back it up but trust me, my internet opinion is worth about the same anyway.
did you go to catholic school? |
|
|
| _EuG_ |
| i went to public school |
|
|
| nusty |
| quote: | | Withdrawal (Coitus Interruptus) What is withdrawal? "No deposit, no return." (Sperm is not deposited in the vagina, so no baby results). When the man senses that he is about to come, he pulls his penis out of the vagina. He ejaculates (comes) outside of the vagina. This takes a lot of discipline! If the woman has not had an orgasm, the man can stimulate her in other ways after withdrawal. It works best if the couple has agreed to use this method in advance. Among typical couples who initiate use of withdrawal, about 27 percent of women will experience an accidental pregnancy in the first year. If withdrawal is used consistently and correctly, about 4 percent of women will become pregnant. Use in combination with spermicides (foam or film) for increased effectiveness |
read a bit closer. ;) |
|
|
|
|
