|
Chicago panoramas and other shots (LOTS) (pg. 15)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| malek |
OMFGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
:eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop: :eyespop:
This is just insane, revolutionary!!!
That video is crazy!!!!!!! |
|
|
| delobbo |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
You created the thread, so that would be a yes. Just edit your first post. ;) |
true, but that doesn't change how it appears on the main topic view. I just tried it.. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by delobbo
true, but that doesn't change how it appears on the main topic view. I just tried it.. |
Change the post subject. If you want I can demonstrate. |
|
|
| delobbo |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
Change the post subject. If you want I can demonstrate. |
I clicked edit, and changed the post subject, and hit save. :confused: |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by delobbo
I clicked edit, and changed the post subject, and hit save. :confused: |
sometimes TA is slow. I have recently had posts show up 20minutes late for some reason. lol |
|
|
| delobbo |
ok well, we'll see!
btw dunno if you have heard the talk about the video framerate issue. but 24fps is the "film" rate and 30fps is "video".. the 5D2 is 30fps. It results in the video looking like it was shot by a camcorder. Anyways, people are speaking out all over the place about this issue and I have a feeling Canon will do a firmware update to have selectable fps. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by delobbo
ok well, we'll see!
btw dunno if you have heard the talk about the video framerate issue. but 24fps is the "film" rate and 30fps is "video".. the 5D2 is 30fps. It results in the video looking like it was shot by a camcorder. Anyways, people are speaking out all over the place about this issue and I have a feeling Canon will do a firmware update to have selectable fps. |
How does having a higher or lower FPS have anything to do with the quality of the shots? Those people are ing idiots. More fps just means smoother motion. You know like 60hz and 120hz refresh rates? Exactly the same concept. |
|
|
| delobbo |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
How does having a higher or lower FPS have anything to do with the quality of the shots? Those people are ing idiots. More fps just means smoother motion. You know like 60hz and 120hz refresh rates? Exactly the same concept. |
no, its a valid issue, they are not idiots, they are pros. movies are shot at 24fps (23.976 to be exact) and this gives them the "film" look. you might have to do some reading on it to understand what they're talking about. it's a pretty big difference. |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by delobbo
no, its a valid issue, they are not idiots, they are pros. movies are shot at 24fps (23.976 to be exact) and this gives them the "film" look. you might have to do some reading on it to understand what they're talking about. it's a pretty big difference. |
If I am not mistaken, this has NOTHING to do with FPS, and has EVERYTHING to do with the sensor.
If I am correct in my assumption they are talking about the FOV problems where EVERYTHING is in focus, you have no depth, etc? If that is the case, FPS is a lame excuse. It is NOT FPS, but sensor design. ;) |
|
|
| delobbo |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
If I am not mistaken, this has NOTHING to do with FPS, and has EVERYTHING to do with the sensor.
If I am correct in my assumption they are talking about the FOV problems where EVERYTHING is in focus, you have no depth, etc? If that is the case, FPS is a lame excuse. It is NOT FPS, but sensor design. ;) |
no, that's not what they're talking about.
have a look here:
http://prolost.blogspot.com/2008/09...24p-please.html |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
...23.975 vs 29.997 has good arguments if you are outputting for film use, but who is? 29.997 is fine (Yes I saw that they were complaining of the retiming and ghosting issues associated with resampling, etc) but that doesn't change the fact that 50fps and 100fps will have no effect on color gamut, fov, depth, clarity (except in high motion), etc. It is strictly adding more frames per second. Sensor design has a huge effect on how it deals with higher frame rates, and the quality, but strictly blaming fps is a crock of .
You should check out the RED ONE if you haven't read up on it. |
|
|
| delobbo |
| lots of people want the "film" look, on their computer screens. which is possible with 24fps. I'm one of em. :) I know about the Red One - kinda an entirely different ballgame. |
|
|
|
|
