|
Chicago panoramas and other shots (LOTS) (pg. 29)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
crazy good. id like to see what kind of IQ it got. |
When you say IQ, you mean what exactly? |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
cool - i'd rather give you at your specific resolution, it needs some TLC in resizing.. what size you want? |
Alright then 1920x1200. :) |
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
When you say IQ, you mean what exactly? |
Basically, the 5D/5D2 are known for their IQ (image quality). I would like to see how the 850 stacks up to em. |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
Basically, the 5D/5D2 are known for their IQ (image quality). I would like to see how the 850 stacks up to em. |
Oh, image quality. Duh, sorry, I'm a bit slow today :p
Well, as far as I'm aware, the image quality is extremely good. |
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Oh, image quality. Duh, sorry, I'm a bit slow today :p
Well, as far as I'm aware, the image quality is extremely good. |
oh ok. yea I wasn't sure exactly what you were asking so I just tried to be as clear as possible. :D |
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
| quote: | Originally posted by gehzumteufel
Thanks! |
np - i noticed I have to fix the clouds - theres not supposed to be any black part in there.
about the A850 - this is pretty cool:
| quote: | | After pressing the depth of field preview button, the camera “grabs” a RAW preview image which is processed and displayed on the LCD screen. You can then fine tune white balance, determine the best level and effect of dynamic range optimization, adjust exposure compensation and check histogram data, all before you actually take the picture. Preview images are not recorded on the camera’s memory card, thus saving capacity. |
|
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
one of the real knowledgeable guys on another forum Im on just shared this tidbit about the A850:
| quote: | I just looked up the latest prices on B&H: If you compare a A850 with a 16-35mm and 24-70mm, with a Canon 5D2 and the equivalent L glass, the Canon kit is only $37 more. That means that the two Sony lenses are $663 more than the Canon equivalents because the body is $700 more. Start adding in a couple more lenses and flashes and the Sony kit would be insanely expensive.
It's not really the value Sony would like everyone to believe it is. |
in other words, A850 = FTL! |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
one of the real knowledgeable guys on another forum Im on just shared this tidbit about the A850:
in other words, A850 = FTL! |
Yeah, I always found that to be a bit cheeky of them. Charging the same amount as Canon, but for a non-IS lens just because the cam has the IS. But then, it is Sony, after all :p |
|
|
| gehzumteufel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Yeah, I always found that to be a bit cheeky of them. Charging the same amount as Canon, but for a non-IS lens just because the cam has the IS. But then, it is Sony, after all :p |
See! What did I tell you! :p |
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
| well from the sound of it they are charging more than Canon L for their lenses. thats kinda nuts. |
|
|
|
|
