|
Chicago panoramas and other shots (LOTS) (pg. 37)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Rasidel Slika |
hey time for a little update...
this one I did in a "SimCity" style.. this is NYC
 |
|
|
| WittyHandle |
| Some great new shots there. Love the last one! |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
|
Love this one. The barrel distortion looks awesome.
Great shots mate :) |
|
|
| stren |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Love this one. The barrel distortion looks awesome.
Great shots mate :) |
looks like being on a bad trip. How does one achieve that ? |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by stren
looks like being on a bad trip. How does one achieve that ? |
Any lens that goes wide enough will start to show barrel distortion on the edges. |
|
|
| stren |
| hmm interesting, different then fisheye distortion, never used such lens |
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
well, the lens does have a good amount of distortion on the wide end (Tamron 28-300 VC) but that is not what you're seeing. What you see is because its a 11-shot panoramic. And, I set the stitching mode to that effect. Could also present it without distortion, if needed. But, I liked the dramatic effect.
Here are the original images used to create that:
 |
|
|
| Rasidel Slika |
| well, i said i could do it without distortion, but thats not really accurate. the reason is, its like physically impossible to present that view without some distortion. just because the field of view is so big. it does result in a fish-eye kind of effect. i dont think I explained that too well lol. |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Rasidel Slika
well, i said could do it without distortion, but thats not really accurate. the reason is, its like physically impossible to present that view without some distortion. just because the field of view is so big. it does result in a fish-eye kind of effect. i dont think I explained that too well lol. |
Makes sense to me :p |
|
|
|
|
