|
This just in: Boris is an admitted pedo (pg. 10)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by saluyamo
You watched more than one. What were you expecting to see the 2nd time? |
Anal? 
yea im sure there is no hell, but if there is someone who believes in it then they know i am going to it. |
|
|
| KilldaDJ |
/b/ THRED TIEM NAO???
i would post a picdump but i dont want to get banned, cant be arsed to make an alt nor do i have any pedo related jpegs :eyespop: |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
seriously vivid has never been to /b/ I think his brain would explode going there, especially when the mods are not around.
id'd tell him to visit n4c, but that is illegal in canada lol cause drawings = abusing real children. |
|
|
| KilldaDJ |
:haha: what has been seen cannot be unseen!!
oh and on the subject, im not really supriesd that boris admits to being a kiddie fiddler :crazy: |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
I haven't posted in this thread before now, and haven't read it all either.
Boris, when you watched the child pornography, did you enjoy it?
I mean this to be a serious question. |
|
|
| saluyamo |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
id'd tell him to visit n4c, but that is illegal in canada lol cause drawings = abusing real children. |
Canada really is Australia's brother... |
|
|
| boris_the_bear |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Boris, when you watched the child pornography, did you enjoy it?
I mean this to be a serious question. |
well. i don't think you can call that enjoying. it was more like "woaaahh holy *heart pumping* that is weird!!111". you cannot get a neutral brain response to that. you'll have to try it for yourself. was there a bit of sexual arousal? yes, definitely. it's not sexually neutral or sex-free content so your brain cannot avoid a sex-related reaction. prove me wrong? but not enough to actually enjoy it. i'd rather watch 18 y.o. teens getting humped in their sexy butts. sufficient answer?
=------------------------
ok, let's put the cards on the table.
action determined by citizens to be detrimental to society = crime
my actions =/= a crime under any criminal law
my actions =/= detrimental to society
jokes aside. seeing how frank i can be, will you believe me if i say that during my entire life i have never committed (not plan to commit) any act that could be related to any form of sexual offense under any possible criminal law (except for storing ordinary porn :p ).
so the math is simple:
jennypie's behavior = not committed any sexual offense (but who knows)
eric b's behavior = not committed any sexual offense (but who knows)
boris's behavior = not committed any sexual offense
i.e.
in official terms of social hazard: jennypie = eric b = boris.
regarding morality issues of my behavior:
you are entitled to take part in determining social morals =
= you are in fact taking part in determining social morals =
= my behavior fails to comply with the morals determined =
= my behavior is immoral.
but please remember that there are several billions of people with other different moral values on this planet. you know what happens when one group of people decide to forcefully impose justice on another group of people simply based on moral difference.
if you do wish to argue though, please make sure you don't appeal to logical fallacies and "no you" argument so as not to turn this thread into my triumph instead of my public execution
hugs, kisses
edit: example of a result of a common logical fallacy:
| quote: | Originally posted by KilldaDJ
im not really supriesd that boris admits to being a kiddie fiddler :crazy: |
|
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by boris_the_bear
well. i don't think you can call that enjoying. it was more like "woaaahh holy *heart pumping* that is weird!!111". you cannot get a neutral brain response to that. you'll have to try it for yourself. was there a bit of sexual arousal? yes, definitely. it's not sexually neutral or sex-free content so your brain cannot avoid a sex-related reaction. prove me wrong? but not enough to actually enjoy it. i'd rather watch 18 y.o. teens getting humped in their sexy butts. sufficient answer? |
Boris, given what this thread is, I'm not sure it's something I want to discuss with you.
Your response/justification... I can only say that most people would MAKE A POINT to avoid seeking or watching the material that you have described. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
Again, pointing to Holland. Possessing and making child porn there was legal till the 1990s. Color Climax (large Dutch porn house, still in business) made dozens of hard core child porn videos/films, and they probably still would be if international pressure hadn't put the kibosh on it.
You can't really call the Dutch different in many other regards either. They just seem to enjoy sex with children. The age of consent there is still 12 with parents permission. :wtf:
Japan has had the same issues. Their laws are really very lax on issues such as these.
All in all, molesting children is wrong, molestation in any form is wrong, but the social connotations of how it is viewed vary wildly even in similar cultures and VERY wildly in other dissimilar cultures.
Its not a cold cut case of "THIS IS WRONG BECAUSE ITS WRONG" like murder since there is nothing physically, in the most basic sense of the word wrong with sex in any form, but how cultures perceive issues related to it.
I am really just playing devils advocate here though. Boris is a twat to bring this up in public and expect a different reaction. On the other hand as long as he isnt out molesting children, what he does in the privacy of his home with himself is not really any ones business... and he shouldn't be making it other peoples business. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| also the perverse vigilantism of Eric is disturbing and is equally disturbing at that. Twats like him and Slylee who go with their gut reactionary feelings will be the downfall of modern society in the west. |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
The age of consent there is still 12 with parents permission. |
Ah yes, the Dutch. Honestly, how often do you think that ^ happens?
"Oh cool, you're welcome to shag my 12 year-old daughter" |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Ah yes, the Dutch. Honestly, how often do you think that ^ happens?
"Oh cool, you're welcome to shag my 12 year-old daughter" |
Enough to keep the law there? :p
In reality it is more than likely this is used to provide legal child prostitution services via parent pimps.
Its really disturbing actually... :nervous: |
|
|
|
|
