Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
The same could be said of any photo of any vile act. You're an idiot... I am not trying to make excuses for child molesters, but free speech is free speech no matter how vile it is.
How the is owning child pornography "speech", exactly?
quote:
Also a majority of the child pornography that is consumed by non-child molesters is believed to be in the average age of 15 to 30 years old. Those children are now in their 40's and 50's.
So an act stops being immoral and wrong if it's safely in the past?
Omega_Blue
sexuality with children varies from society to society, culture to culture. it's not acceptable in most western societies. end of story.
to put it in perspective: the sambia tribe in new guinea initiates all of the young boys by having them perform fellatio on the older men; semen is considered a sort of "life force" that must be ingested for the boys to eventually use to bear child with women. women live in a separate area of the village and have intercourse solely for procreation. for a young boy to perform fellatio on another young boy is wrong, as it is "stealing" the "lifeforce" from another. google it, we had to study the tribe in anthropology back in the day.
ed up right
Dervish
If it's trolling fair enough, cor drama, nothing new.
If not the scary thought is that "ok he admits to this but... what has he really been upto?" (obviously not the actual serious real world stuff, but some kind of middle ground between the jokes and nothing at all). To be honest think boris is just trolling. But what worries me is that a group of people have defended him... Are they justifying his behaviour or their own?
Anyway this isn't a legal argument, it's a moral one. And we all know what is wrong here.
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by Dervish
Anyway this isn't a legal argument, it's a moral one. And we all know what is wrong here.
Yes, we do! I'll tell you what's wrong: We need more Tosh!!!
And Avril Lavigne :D
R.j.
quote:
Originally posted by Dervish
If it's trolling fair enough, cor drama, nothing new.
If not the scary thought is that "ok he admits to this but... what has he really been upto?" (obviously not the actual serious real world stuff, but some kind of middle ground between the jokes and nothing at all). To be honest think boris is just trolling. But what worries me is that a group of people have defended him... Are they justifying his behaviour or their own?
Anyway this isn't a legal argument, it's a moral one. And we all know what is wrong here.
I don't think it's so much that we're defending him; it has to do with the fact that there are number of people here who are constantly making new threads/replying with things that paint him as this oh-so evil pedo, as though we were ignorant to the fact that he has his unusual sense of humor.
Yes, we understand. He's got a problem. The irony is that it isn't boris advertising it AS MUCH as those who are flaming him. I really don't see the problem in his comments if the COR can make fun of rape (which is pretty much in the same league of child pornography) death, etc. It's the hypocrisy that bothers me. If they were so upset about pedos, then why aren't they on 4chan collecting IPs and notifying the authorities?
Big Worm
quote:
Originally posted by R.j.
I don't think it's so much that we're defending him; it has to do with the fact that there are number of people here who are constantly making new threads/replying with things that paint him as this oh-so evil pedo, as though we were ignorant to the fact that he has his unusual sense of humor.
Yes, we understand. He's got a problem. The irony is that it isn't boris advertising it AS MUCH as those who are flaming him. I really don't see the problem in his comments if the COR can make fun of rape (which is pretty much in the same league of child pornography) death, etc. It's the hypocrisy that bothers me. If they were so upset about pedos, then why aren't they on 4chan collecting IPs and notifying the authorities?
exactly.
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by R.j.
I don't think it's so much that we're defending him; it has to do with the fact that there are number of people here who are constantly making new threads/replying with things that paint him as this oh-so evil pedo, as though we were ignorant to the fact that he has his unusual sense of humor.
Yes, we understand. He's got a problem. The irony is that it isn't boris advertising it AS MUCH as those who are flaming him. I really don't see the problem in his comments if the COR can make fun of rape (which is pretty much in the same league of child pornography) death, etc. It's the hypocrisy that bothers me. If they were so upset about pedos, then why aren't they on 4chan collecting IPs and notifying the authorities?
pl pl plus-1!
and
PLUR
Dervish
Did find some of the reactions amusing too. As I say if jokes fine (at least some of it must be).
But baseline; seeking out and watching multiple child abuse videos and admitting liking it, is basically saying you need help (or if you don't think you need help, you should be "helped"...).
PETRAN
As a psychologist i propose aversion behavioural therapy to boris and vivid. In the first case we will couple child pedophilic material with hard gerontophilic porn and in the second the delusion of being someone important with replying to old slylee posts
Big Worm
clockwork orange, FTW!
PETRAN
quote:
Originally posted by Big Worm
clockwork orange, FTW!
