another thing i've learned apart from ATTACK KILL DESTROY :p is to leave a thread to stir for a while and let stupid people like Eric talk themselves into trouble.
once again. i have seen CP. it was a weird emotional mixture of excitement and disgust which cannot be described unless you try it yourself (which you say you would never do. chickens). i would not watch it again because little kids being ed does not turn me on and they are in no way my fetish. so here i am, telling you this, sharing my unusual experience with sincerity never seen on the forum before, and you've gone as far as reporting my IP, threatening to crack my face, criminalizing my actions, demonizing me, condemning the very fact of me telling you about it. there is really not much left for me to do to weaken your arguments :)
quote:
Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Eric did you not read any of the posts I made last night or is those big words too durn hard for ya.
maybe reading and analyzing is a redundant function for serious dons
quote:
Originally posted by saluyamo
and he forgot to answer the question of, 'why did he watch more than one?'
good question. it's not that i extremely enjoyed watching it, but i just did not feel like puking my guts out right away and throwing my PC out of the window. i was satisfying my curiosity in the amount i felt ok.
saymyname
quote:
Originally posted by EricB.
here's the thing, when people joke about rape its so in far fetched that we know its ajoke and therefore we laugh at it. even jay has used pedophile jokes and I have laughed at it. I laughed at it because it was so damn far fetched that I knew it was total bs, thus being a joke. However, Borris is not in jokin. Its not that far fteched. The guy repeatedly talks about this fetish. He talks about it so much and his stories sound so truthful that its reached the point i think (along with the rest of this community) that he is a genuine pedophile. And if he is one, its not any laughing matter.
quote:
Originally posted by EricB.
well i care and the first thing im going to do when i meet this guy is punch him in the in face.
Also i reported him. joke or no joke you dont around with stuff like that.
quote:
Originally posted by EricB.
well if he was trolling too bad. You shouldn't joke about like that.
Epic Fail
SuspicionVandit
here's a video of an 11 year old having an orgasm
now, how did you accidentally watch it?
this thread looks good. time to read it backwards
DjWhooCares
quote:
Originally posted by EricB.
*cough* hypocrite *cough* srsly, stfu. you annoy the out of me and im sure im not alone on this. if i were you, id find the highest building in ur town and jump off it. Do us a favor plz
i am in no way condoning boris actions, but youre a ing gimp for taking it this far... you
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by boris_the_bear
another thing i've learned apart from ATTACK KILL DESTROY :p is to leave a thread to stir for a while and let stupid people like Eric talk themselves into trouble.
once again. i have seen CP. it was a weird emotional mixture of excitement and disgust which cannot be described unless you try it yourself (which you say you would never do. chickens). i would not watch it again because little kids being ed does not turn me on and they are in no way my fetish. so here i am, telling you this, sharing my unusual experience with sincerity never seen on the forum before, and you've gone as far as reporting my IP, threatening to crack my face, criminalizing my actions, demonizing me, condemning the very fact of me telling you about it. there is really not much left for me to do to weaken your arguments :)
maybe reading and analyzing is a redundant function for serious dons
good question. it's not that i extremely enjoyed watching it, but i just did not feel like puking my guts out right away and throwing my PC out of the window. i was satisfying my curiosity in the amount i felt ok.
who the is curious about child porn?
Halcyon+On+On
Irresponsible manchildren who get off on the fact that they are doing something taboo, regardless of the harm it might cause. Ah, internets.
boris_the_bear
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
There is always a victim in child pornography: the child.
hmmmmm... law school for blonds graduate? you must have heard that crimes are willful and unlawful acts e.g. "production of child pornography", "storage, distribution, promotion of child pornography", "forcing a child to take part in the filming of child pornography" etc. "child pornography" itself is not an act. it is an end product of the criminal act of it's production in the form of video or graphic material. "child pornography" is not a name of a crime, hence legally there is no victim of "child pornography". just like death of a murder victim is not an act, but an end result of the criminal act called "murder".
you are basically trying to accuse me of a crime that does not exist ("watching child pornography"), disregarding tons of adequate rationale in the legal and moral context posted by other users in this thread.
you herd of incompetent wanna-be prosecutors :o
quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
pretty ed
making up those quotes in such detail is pretty ed :p
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
who the is curious about child porn?
i was. but my curiosity has no been satisfied.
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by boris_the_bear
you are basically trying to accuse me of a crime that does not exist ("watching child pornography"), disregarding tons of adequate rationale in the legal and moral context posted by other users in this thread.
No I'm not. I'm not accusing you of any crime, you stupid stick. I'm talking to Nou about the validity of his "freedom of speech" argument.
boris_the_bear
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
No I'm not. I'm not accusing you of any crime, you stupid stick. I'm talking to Nou about the validity of his "freedom of speech" argument.
the reply was not directly referring to you. you may, however, voluntarily include yourself in the list of "a herd of incompetent wanna-be prosecutors":p
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by boris_the_bear
the reply was not directly referring to you. you may, however, voluntarily include yourself in the list of "a herd of incompetent wanna-be prosecutors":p
So why did you quote a specific sentence of my post, you idiot?
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
How the is owning child pornography "speech", exactly?
I think one could make an argument that the right to free speech has a necessary companion right to view that speech. After all, what use is political protest or scientific data, for example, if everyone is forbidden from learning about it and accessing it?
Anyway, though people do have a right to free speech and disseminating pornography is a form of speech, I think children, or adults who were abused as children, also have a right not to have records of their abuse freely passed around and viewed. I do not think the former should override the latter, so I think a ban on kiddie porn is fine.
boris_the_bear
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
So why did you quote a specific sentence of my post, you idiot?
my bad. i guess i took it out of context. i just saw a suitable phrase to use it as a starting point for my argument. sorry
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Anyway, though people do have a right to free speech and disseminating pornography is a form of speech, I think children, or adults who were abused as children, also have a right not to have records of their abuse freely passed around and viewed. I do not think the former should override the latter, so I think a ban on kiddie porn is fine.
correct, but once it is passed, you cannot prohibit and penalize its viewing. if you want to fight child pornography as an occurrence, you should punish those who are distributing it and financially or technically perpetuating it's existence - selling, buying, promoting, filming, processing etc.
i don't see where the act of viewing a sample of CP for free, whether intentionally or by accident, by a bypasser fits into the scheme of perpetuating the existence of this crime.
