return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 
Your definition of a perfect "trance" track (pg. 10)
View this Thread in Original format
Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by Rodri Santos
Maybe you aren't a producer and you don't have to know this but that ultra deep bass it's just a sidechain compression of the driving bass.


No, indeed I'm not, otherwise maybe it would have been a shame a didn't know :)
I just now and then get to hear some new stuff my friend is working on, when he asks me for my opinion.

Love that deep sound of this one too at 4:24 whatever it's called :)

Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by DancingMonkey
Why, anyone who thinks trance older than 1996 is better than today's must either be bat insane or 80+ years old and senile. Those are the only explanations for such an outrageous statement!


Anyone who thinks just one of them can be better is too.
Rodri Santos
quote:
Originally posted by Trance-MB
No, indeed I'm not, otherwise maybe it would have been a shame a didn't know :)
I just now and then get to hear some new stuff my friend is working on, when he asks me for my opinion.

Love that deep sound of this one too at 4:24 whatever it's called :)



It's the same "effect" what nearly all the trance production uses as a bass is that, a rolling bassline which is more melodic and that very deep bass which makes that effect, that ducking is what moves the crowd a lot they say...
msz
there is no perfect trance track, you'll never find it fools.
Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by msz
there is no perfect trance track, you'll never find it fools.


LOL, of course there is, many more then one and for everybody probably different tracks.
msz
very good does not equal perfect.
Trance-MB
quote:
Originally posted by msz
very good does not equal perfect.


Then perfect doesn't exist, so a very very good track IMO is close enough.
pointPi
The reason I posted this thread from the first place, was because I've noticed many of you conservative trance devotees don't like how tracks from e.g. Andy Blueman, Lemon & Einar K, Bjorn Akesson, Arctic Moon, Jorn van Deynhoven etc. seem to sound too similar to each other, almost that they're copying each other. Well, I thought, then I could draw the conclusion that these uplifting (as a genre) producers are focusing their effort into making THE perfect trance track. So I wanted to ask you guys what your ideals were, and so far there has been a wild debate between the older and younger generation.

I don't mind, no taste is really more intellectual than another, unless you like "A Love Letter". Really, I want trance t sound like this:

But Paul van Dyk - A Love Letter sounded more like this:
RebeL9
quote:
Originally posted by pointPi
Well, I thought, then I could draw the conclusion that these uplifting (as a genre) producers are focusing their effort into making THE perfect trance track.



What are you basing that on?
pointPi
quote:
Originally posted by RebeL9
What are you basing that on?



That's just my hypothesis. I actually don't know what the real reason is.

Redd
use peoples number 1 from this thread: http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=559507 and count it as the closest to perfect trance can get for people.

for me it's a track that makes me cry rainbows, bleed semen and cum unicorns
RebeL9
quote:
Originally posted by pointPi
That's just my hypothesis. I actually don't know what the real reason is.


Must be the vaguest hypothesis I've heard.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 
Privacy Statement