|
Some new Rise of Skywalker footage (pg. 18)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Hides in Shadow |
| So JEO posted random movie links to their imdb page and Rann chose those as a scapegoat claiming he worked on them? no way :haha: |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| So do people actually know RANNs's real name then? I'm confused, but probably because half the conversation is blocked, lol. Someone explain please, I need some entertainment for my shift tonight. |
|
|
| Hides in Shadow |
| [Post edited - Sushi] |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Illegal, huh? Want to cite some court cases or law codes to support that claim? |
It's legal. Unethical and unsavory, sure, but it's legal. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Illegal, huh? Want to cite some court cases or law codes to support that claim?
|
http://theothermccain.com/2012/11/1...always-illegal/
https://securityboulevard.com/2019/...-to-prevent-it/
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
I don't believe that your name was mentioned in any of the links that JEO posted.
|
Bull. That's exactly why Stu removed it.
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
You were the one who brought up people's personal work projects first. It is nothing more than just deserts and poetic justice that you had it done to you. It's also simply hilarious since it is evidence that you've been lying about what you do for years. And then for you to go and cry to the moderators at the first sign of your tactic backfiring? Priceless.
|
You're failing to understand there's a gulf larger and deeper than the space between your ears about talking generalities about someone's work such as "the entertainment industry" or "in signage" and posting links that literally states the name and address of the employer, my name, my boss's name projects I've worked and my colleagues who worked on it....and specifically when i've never linked to anything I've ever done or released my name to you.
You specifically also were about to doxx someone else close to me - not me - becuase in your fumbling you thought you found something I'm closely associated with.
And why haven't you posted up the name of your employer, who you work with and the names of your clients and colleagues?
Ah, that's right, becuase it could lead to your personal security being violated.
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Why not? For years, you have publicly claimed on this forum that you work in the film industry, so I searched for you in IMDB and found absolutely nothing. I merely pointed that amusing fact out. |
That's precisely the point you dolt. I don't have an IMDB anymore becuase of security concerns and I've never needed one for work _ you now know at least three major ing projects I've worked on but there's no IMDB What does that tell you? THERE'S NOT AN IMDB FOR A REASON.
I also have no social media accounts whatsoever for the same reasons. Some people got my details in the past and I started getting bombarded with fan questions regarding who I work for. Imagine Juan off his meds, figuring out where Mel worked. And it was a strip club.
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
I fully agree that doxxing is not okay, as it's extremely unsporting and ungentlemanly. You were the one who started us down that path, however, with your comments re: System-J's job.
|
You obviously ing don't think it's not OK, becuase that's exactly what you were engaging in and exactly why Stu removed and told you not to do it. I didn't release where jack worked or even provided anything that could link to it, nor did I ever start looking in to his fiance's work.
It's pathetic to see you trying to say you weren't releasing private information when Stu redacted it for that very reason.
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Also, I have not doxxed you. I could, but I won't, because I'm not an douchebag. Perhaps you should be less of an arrogant and pompous , though. Maybe someday you'll piss off someone who doesn't quite have the morals or sense of fair-play that I do.
|
I know you won't becuase you'll get banned in a heartbeat, not to mention you'll be doxing someone else close to me that I've never mentioned on here. The fact you're saying "I could, but I won't" speak volumes. Jack never went there, neither did I, but you and Jeo did. You may not like how or what I post, I don't really care for your content truth be told, but the thought of posting your work place or where you studied never even crossed my mind.
Until you figure out that's not OK, I'm still slightly less of an than you are.
| quote: | Originally posted by Lews
Your comments about your line (and lines) of work are bull and we all know it, Rann. A smattering of true details embellished beyond belief. Also, you have released many personal and professional details on TA, even if you've forgotten. You have been running your mouth on this board since 2001, you may recall. |
So bull that you managed to find major international releases and projects I've worked on, and in fact, I've never posted the personal or professional details you two were both digging up.
You may not like what i've got to say but that doesn't give you any ing lenience to try to dig up anything personal or professional about me, not least because I've never publicly posted it. |
|
|
| idoru |
That's about dox'ing a federal employee. Are you a federal employee? From your own link:
| quote: | | It’s against the law to “dox” a federal employee... |
| quote: | | With regular citizens, doxing falls under various state criminal laws, such as stalking, cyberstalking, harassment, threats, and other such laws, depending on the state. |
Basically, if the information is obtained from public sources and what is published is used non-maliciously, then it's legal. Pretty sure nobody was stalking, cyberstalking, harassing or threatening you. They just used publicly available information to point out that you may be lying. Relax.
My sources:
https://metro.co.uk/2017/07/05/what...oid-it-6757123/
https://www.shapirolozano.com/blog/...x-someone.shtml
https://stories.avvo.com/rights/pri...ling-wrong.html
https://stories.avvo.com/rights/pri...ants-legal.html
If you want to further question its legality, please cite an actual law. |
|
|
| Hides in Shadow |
| Stu...this is the guy you back up and call a friend?? Scary man..Also from what FLTA friends tell me is that Mel works in jewish workplace which she probably met her fiancé, no your not funny mentioning strip club, I can see your taking this whole fiasco as a joke. |
|
|
| JEO |
1. Ask for a hundred pounds for disclosing proof you worked on one of the biggest commercial movies ever.
2. NDA
3. ???
4. DJ RANN in the house. |
|
|
| Hides in Shadow |
| Damn this cover up has been going on since 2001 |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
Except he was doing to it with malicious intent.
Did you even read the link I posted?
| quote: | Doxing is always illegal, whether it is done against a federal employee, a state employee, or a regular person. There are federal and state laws that specifically address doxing government employees. With regular citizens, doxing falls under various state criminal laws, such as stalking, cyberstalking, harassment, threats, and other such laws, depending on the state. Since these doxing threats and activities are made on the internet, the law of any state may be invoked, though most often an investigator will look to the state in which the person making the threat is located, if this is known, or the state in which the victim is situated. A state prosecutor can only prosecute violations of the laws of his or her own state, and of acts that extend into their state. When acts are on the internet, they extend into all the states.
Misinformation was spread that doxing is legal
I am not sure how or why anyone fell for that misinformation. Surely, people must understand instinctively, even if they were misled about the law, that if they are threatening someone or putting them at risk, or tormenting or harassing the other on the internet, that this must be illegal. Common sense would tell you that bullying or jeopardizing another would be illegal in some way. So yes, doxing is illegal, no matter who the target. |
That's from the lawyer specializing in the field. |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
That's precisely the point you dolt. I don't have an IMDB anymore becuase of security concerns and I've never needed one for work _ you now know at least three major ing projects I've worked on but there's no IMDB What does that tell you? THERE'S NOT AN IMDB FOR A REASON. |
So, I'm curious. You don't set up your IMDB page, it automagically gets generated when you (the royal "you") are credited for work on a project. I got curious just now to see how easy it would be to remove something you're credited for from IMDB. Honestly man, it sounds like a whole hell of a lot of work. In fact, in the two links below, there are a hell of a lot of people commenting about how impossibly difficult it is to get IMDB to remove credits once they've been added.
https://ask.metafilter.com/153791/P...-be-a-celebrity
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/to...om_my_imdb_page
I'd like to know just how arduous the process was for you.
Edit: And from IMBD directly...
| quote: | | It's our policy not to alter or delete any kind of correct/factual information or credit from our records, therefore, if your worked on that title your credit will need to remain listed on the site. |
https://getsatisfaction.com/imdb/to...-my-imdb-credit |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Except he was doing to it with malicious intent.
Did you even read the link I posted?
That's from the lawyer specializing in the field. |
I read the whole piece. Please note that the lawyer essentially states that dox'ing itself is not illegal, but could be considered illegal if it is coupled with another illegal act such as harassment, stalking, etc., which is what I've already said. Again - trying to say you were lying is not malicious intent, and if you're going to insist that it's illegal when people are just using publicly available data to state facts, then you're going to need to cite an actual law. If you can't do that, then Hitchen's Razor applies here and we can completely disregard your claims. |
|
|
|
|
