|
Some new Rise of Skywalker footage (pg. 19)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by JEO
1. Ask for a hundred pounds for disclosing proof you worked on one of the biggest commercial movies ever.
2. NDA
3. ???
4. DJ RANN in the house. |
1, Keep posting that I've never worked on the industry again
2, Offer to send proof to a private 3rd party so I don't get doxxed or breach an NDA
3, cvnts try to share my personal info online
4. ????
5. Not profit |
|
|
| Hides in Shadow |
| Iduru 2 Rann 0 |
|
|
| Lews |
Wrong. Doxxing is only illegal if done as part of 'stalking, cyberstalking, harassment, [or] threats,' per your own link. Pointing out that you are lying is none of those things.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Bull. That's exactly why Stu removed it. |
I don't know exactly why Stu removed it, but it was not because your name was listed in any of the 3 IMDB links. It was not there.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
You're failing to understand there's a gulf larger and deeper than the space between your ears about talking generalities about someone's work such as "the entertainment industry" or "in signage" and posting links that literally states the name and address of the employer, my name, my boss's name projects I've worked and my colleagues who worked on it....and specifically when i've never linked to anything I've ever done or released my name to you. |
You mentioned clients that Jack has worked with. That is not a generality about 'in signage.'
You have made your name extremely public on this forum. I did not have to leave this forum to discover it.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
You specifically also were about to doxx someone else close to me - not me - becuase in your fumbling you thought you found something I'm closely associated with. |
No. I was never about to doxx anyone because, as I said, I find doxxing unsporting. And, also, no, please, we both know that I did not 'think' I found something you're closely associated with. I know precisely what you do, where you do it, and with whom you do it.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
And why haven't you posted up the name of your employer, who you work with and the names of your clients and colleagues?
Ah, that's right, becuase it could lead to your personal security being violated. |
Yes, and I am very cautious about my personal security. Unlike you. You have made your real name known on this forum and you have mentioned more than enough information for someone to find out much, much more about you that you want. So, again, perhaps you should be less of a dick?
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
That's precisely the point you dolt. I don't have an IMDB anymore becuase of security concerns and I've never needed one for work _ you now know at least three major ing projects I've worked on but there's no IMDB What does that tell you? THERE'S NOT AN IMDB FOR A REASON.
I also have no social media accounts whatsoever for the same reasons. Some people got my details in the past and I started getting bombarded with fan questions regarding who I work for. Imagine Juan off his meds, figuring out where Mel worked. And it was a strip club. |
No, I know one major project in which you were involved in a tea-making capacity and I know another, smaller project in which you actually worked, but which was a box office bomb and received terrible reviews. I know of no other projects in which you were involved. I would guess that the reason there is no IMDB is because you are not important enough to merit one.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
You obviously ing don't think it's not OK, becuase that's exactly what you were engaging in and exactly why Stu removed and told you not to do it. I didn't release where jack worked or even provided anything that could link to it, nor did I ever start looking in to his fiance's work.
It's pathetic to see you trying to say you weren't releasing private information when Stu redacted it for that very reason. |
Stu has not redacted or edited anything in my post. I did not release any of your private information. Go back up and read it.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
not to mention you'll be doxing someone else close to me that I've never mentioned on here. |
Indeed, that is my primary reason not to do so, although you have actually mentioned that person on multiple occasions.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
The fact you're saying "I could, but I won't" speak volumes. Jack never went there, neither did I, but you and Jeo did. You may not like how or what I post, I don't really care for your content truth be told, but the thought of posting your work place or where you studied never even crossed my mind. |
Yes, it says that I am choosing to be nice. I could cause you tremendous pain in life outside of TA, but I choose not to. However, other people may not be so nice. Your arrogance and pomposity does not endear you to many people, including people in this thread, and you may find that they are not as kind as me. I am advising you to be nicer to people online.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Until you figure out that's not OK, I'm still slightly less of an than you are. |
I've been quite clear that it is not okay this entire time?
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
So bull that you managed to find major international releases and projects I've worked on, and in fact, I've never posted the personal or professional details you two were both digging up. |
Again, there is a small speck of truth in your bull claims. As I said above, 'I know one major project in which you were involved in a tea-making capacity and I know another, smaller project in which you actually worked, but which was a box office bomb and received terrible reviews. I know of no other projects in which you were involved.'
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
You may not like what i've got to say but that doesn't give you any ing lenience to try to dig up anything personal or professional about me, not least because I've never publicly posted it. |
Pretty sure you want to replace the word 'lenience' with something else there.
Regardless, I have the legal right to look up whatever I want to about you, within the bounds of the law.
I am also legally allowed to laugh my ass off at what I discovered and how far away your reality is from the lies you spew here. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Lol tea-making! |
|
|
| Hides in Shadow |
| Remind me not to ever mess with Lews.. Damnn :p |
|
|
| JEO |
What if someone posted a link to a movie you worked on in the movie recommendations thread, RANN?
If there's public information about you available online, that somehow violates your alleged NDA, we are not the problem.
And how ing long can an NDA last anyway? You've really done a disservice to yourself by signing something like that. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
I read the whole piece. Please note that the lawyer essentially states that dox'ing itself is not illegal, but could be considered illegal if it is coupled with another illegal act such as harassment, stalking, etc., which is what I've already said. Again - trying to say you were lying is not malicious intent, and if you're going to insist that it's illegal when people are just using publicly available data to state facts, then you're going to need to cite an actual law. If you can't do that, then Hitchen's Razor applies here and we can completely disregard your claims. |
I know exactly what it says - my contention per that legal definition explained clearly by that expert lawyer is that Lews and Jeo were doing it with malicious intent and the context was to place me in harms way/harass me. There’s no two ways about that and it’s exolained it’s illegal in those circumstances (which you seem to agree with)
Now Read Lews subsequent post where he has admitted it was effectively revenge for “being an ” and “pompous” and Jeo because he perceives I’d wronged Jack so they tried to publicly post anything they could find about by work history or those around me/I’m connected with. It wasn't single post or link, it was several and included my work address and employer and my clients addresses and names.
The intent was nefarious and the law as you’ve already conceded is clear; with malicious intent it’s illegal. They weren’t doing it for any other reason than to place me in harms way (They knew I’m under NDA) and wanted to intimidate harass by way of revenge doxxing.
Finally, to back up my point:
https://www.brickdonlaw.com/blog/2018/september/what-is-doxxing-is-it-illegal-/
| quote: | Technically, it’s not against the law to find somebody’s publically available information and re-post it elsewhere online. However, there are points where this conduct crosses the line into illegality.
If the information is posted with the intent of harassing the victim, intimidating them, invading their privacy, or having them assaulted, or inspiring or instructing someone else reading the information to do any of these things, the publication of the information is against the law. It is possible for doxxing in this way to be prosecuted as assault, as the intent was to intimidate someone or threaten them with violent conduct. The laws will more than likely change in the near future as this trend becomes even more worryingly common, but even until then the consequences for a full conviction can be severe. |
|
|
|
| Lews |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
I know exactly what it says - my contention per that legal definition explained clearly by that expert lawyer is that Lews and Jeo were doing it with malicious intent and the context was to place me in harms way/harass me. There’s no two ways about that and it’s exolained it’s illegal in those circumstances (which you seem to agree with) |
Pointing out that you are lying about your career history is putting you in harms way? Want to explain that?
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Now Read Lews subsequent post where he has admitted it was effectively revenge for “being an ” and “pompous” and Jeo because he perceives I’d wronged Jack so they tried to publicly post anything they could find about by work history or those around me/I’m connected with. It wasn't single post or link, it was several and included my work address and employer and my clients addresses and names. |
I never admitted anything about seeking revenge on you for being an , although you are an . I merely pointed out that you were lying about your career. I am a stickler for accuracy, you see. I was also warning you that you might not want to bring people's real lives into the arguments, as that tactic could just as easily be brought to bear on you. That was a friendly reminder, not a threat.
Also, JEO posted IMDB pages. Hardly private information about your 'work.'
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
The intent was nefarious and the law as you’ve already conceded is clear; with malicious intent it’s illegal. They weren’t doing it for any other reason than to place me in harms way (They knew I’m under NDA) and wanted to intimidate harass by way of revenge doxxing. |
How have I placed you in harms way? I have not stated a single piece of your personal information in this thread.
If anything I've tried to KEEP you from harms way, by reminding you that it is quite easy for one to discover information about you based on what you have shared on this forum and to alert you that your unfriendly and pompous demeanor may offend people. Think of it like a kind person telling an annoying drunk shouting about politics at a bar that they should talk more quietly, because other people may take it offensively and react poorly. It's a kind warning, nothing more. |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by JEO
What if someone posted a link to a movie you worked on in the movie recommendations thread, RANN?
If there's public information about you available online, that somehow violates your alleged NDA, we are not the problem.
And how ing long can an NDA last anyway? You've really done a disservice to yourself by signing something like that. |
And how the would anyone have known it’s me until you doxxed me?
As for the NDA - it’s ubiquitous In movies, the entire industry uses them and I’ve had to sign one every year for the last 10 years. I don’t actually care as I had no intention of ever discussing the projects or people and hence why I don’t have any social media accounts. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Sooooo, guy brags and hints at his "high profile job" endlessly for years, obviously wanting people to know, or at least believe, he is some big shot in the movie industry, then cries about it when people actually figure out who he is and what he does? Yeah makes a lot of sense.... If you're full of , lol. |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
For 's sake Juan, I literally just posted in this thread that we're not posting people's personal on the forums, and then you go and post Rann's name again?
Post edited, and you are suspended.
Continue bickering. |
|
|
| planetaryplayer |
| Stop quoting rann |
|
|
|
|
