|
Tamils shut down Gardiner! (pg. 25)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| urban_legend |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
ignatieff. wow everyone is ganging up on me.. geez can someone else play devils advocate too? this is too one sided :p |
I am not ganging up on you but you should spell his name right. |
|
|
| El K Dee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
you guys are all ganging up on me. Im not even tamil what the hell.
can someone at least play devils advocate with me?
you can lkd because your the closest one here to tamil :p (genetically) |
hahaha wow man ur so funny...please quite ur day job rait nao and get into the comic eh? |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by urban_legend
I am not ganging up on you but you should spell his name right. |
its kind of difficult when you have to rebutle 20 posts a minute |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by El K Dee
hahaha wow man ur so funny...please quite ur day job rait nao and get into the comic eh? |
LEARN TO SPELL ITS QUIT NOT IGNATIEV
:p |
|
|
| El K Dee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
its kind of difficult when you have to rebutle 20 posts a minute |
maybe you should know a little about a subject before "playing devils advocate" |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
ok well this thread would have been pointless if i didnt interfere it would have just been about people bashing tamils.
at least i brought on a new perspective although limited in defense i must admit. |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
i dunno but 1.5 billion dollar losses relative to 107 billion dollars in revenue is peanuts |
That's $1.5 billion net losses, Einstein.
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
they never issue new shares thats why, buffet doesnt want people buying in. They don't require more equity thats why their market capital is low. |
:conf:
Do you understand that corporations don't actually control the market cap... that it's just the number of shares outstanding times the share price? In other words, it's the most accurate measurement available of the market value of a company.
Issuing more shares would not give Buffet more equity, even if he did require it... ugh, this discussion is getting more inane with each post! |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by MarkT
I'm quite aware.
bringing up share price is a poor argument for evaluating a company's financial health.
ever think that they just don't want volume trading of their stock? |
yes i mentioned this below |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
if i didnt interfere it would have just been about people bashing tamils. |
How many times do we need to tell you that this is about the LTTE, and not Tamils? I mean here you are telling me I'm not keeping it civil, but you've been beaten over the head with this point three or four times now and you still don't get it. What are we supposed to think? |
|
|
| VDub |
| quote: | Originally posted by El K Dee
|
Not like I care or it matters...
It was just my assumption... |
|
|
| El K Dee |
| quote: | Originally posted by VDub
Not like I care or it matters...
It was just my assumption... |
I wonder what ur second guess is...lol |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
That's $1.5 billion net losses, Einstein.
:conf:
Do you understand that corporations don't actually control the market cap... that it's just the number of shares outstanding times the share price? In other words, it's the most accurate measurement available of the market value of a company.
|
obviously, but if they only issue limited shares the market cap will be lower !
1 billion shares at 50 dollars each or 1000 shares at 90,000 each.
ill let you do the math on this one pythagarous
| quote: |
Issuing more shares would not give Buffet more equity, even if he did require it... ugh, this discussion is getting more inane with each post! |
why not?
you issue more shares you have to declare it on the balance sheet. thus the shareholders equity is increased no? |
|
|
|
|
