|
Saddam Hussein convicted to death by hanging
|
View this Thread in Original format
| dEsidEL |
  
| quote: |
Defiant Saddam to hang
Nov. 5, 2006. 07:36 AM
HAMZA HENDAWI
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER
BAGHDAD, Iraq — Saddam Hussein was convicted and sentenced Sunday to hang for crimes against humanity in the 1982 killings of 148 people in a single Shiite town, as the ousted leader, trembling and defiant, shouted "God is great!''
As he, his half brother and another senior official in his regime were convicted and sentenced to death by the Iraqi High Tribunal, Saddam yelled out, "Long live the people and death to their enemies. Long live the glorious nation, and death to its enemies!" Later, his lawyer said the former dictator had called on Iraqis to reject sectarian violence and refrain from revenge against U.S. forces.
The trial brought Saddam and his co-defendants before their accusers in what was one of the most highly publicized and heavily reported trials of its kind since the Nuremberg tribunals for members of Adolf Hitler's Nazi regime and its slaughter of 6 million Jews in the World War II Holocaust
"The verdict placed on the heads of the former regime does not represent a verdict for any one person. It is a verdict on a whole dark era that has was unmatched in Iraq's history," Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq's Shiite prime minister, said.
Some feared the verdicts could exacerbate the sectarian violence that has pushed the country to the brink of civil war, after a trial that stretched over nine months in 39 sessions and ended nearly 31/2 months ago. Clashes immediately began Sunday in north Baghdad's heavily Sunni Azamiyah district. Elsewhere in the capital, celebratory gunfire rang out.
"This government will be responsible for the consequences, with the deaths of hundreds, thousands or even hundreds of thousands, whose blood will be shed," Salih al-Mutlaq, a Sunni political leader, told the Al-Arabiya satellite television station.
Saddam and his seven co-defendants were on trial for a wave of revenge killings carried out in the city of Dujail following a 1982 assassination attempt on the former dictator. Al-Maliki's Islamic Dawa party, then an underground opposition, has claimed responsibility for organizing the attempt on Saddam's life.
In the streets of Dujail, a Tigris River city of 84,000, people celebrated and burned pictures of their former tormentor as the verdict was read.
Saddam's chief lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi condemned the trial as a ``farce," claiming the verdict was planned. He said defense attorneys would appeal within 30 days.
The death sentences automatically go to a nine-judge appeals panel, which has unlimited time to review the case. If the verdicts and sentences are upheld, the executions must be carried out within 30 days.
A court official told The Associated Press that the appeals process was likely to take three to four weeks once the formal paperwork was submitted.
During Sunday's hearing, Saddam initially refused the chief judge's order to rise; two bailiffs pulled the ousted ruler to his feet and he remained standing through the sentencing, sometimes wagging his finger at the judge.
Before the session began, one of Saddam's lawyers, former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, was ejected from the courtroom after handing the judge a memorandum in which he called the trial a travesty.
Chief Judge Raouf Abdul-Rahman pointed to Clark and said in English, "Get out.''
In addition to the former Iraqi dictator and Barzan Ibrahim, his former intelligence chief and half brother, the Iraqi High Tribunal convicted and sentenced Awad Hamed al-Bandar, the head of Iraq's former Revolutionary Court, to death by hanging. Iraq's former Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan was convicted of premeditated murder and sentenced to life in prison.
Three defendants were sentenced to 15 years in prison for torture and premeditated murder. Abdullah Kazim Ruwayyid and his son Mizhar Abdullah Ruwayyid were party officials Dujail, along with Ali Dayih Ali. They were believed responsible for the Dujail arrests.
Mohammed Azawi Ali, a former Dujail Baath Party official, was acquitted for lack of evidence and immediately freed.
He faces additional charges in a separate case over an alleged massacre of Kurdish civilians — a trial that will continue while appeals are pending.
The guilty verdict is likely to enrage hard-liners among Saddam's fellow Sunnis, who made up the bulk of the former ruling class. The country's majority Shiites, who were persecuted under the former leader but now largely control the government, will likely view the outcome as a cause of celebration.
Al-Dulaimi, Saddam's lawyer, told AP his client called on Iraqis to reject sectarian violence and called on them to refrain from taking revenge on U.S. invaders.
"His message to the Iraqi people was 'pardon and do not take revenge on the invading nations and their people'," al-Dulaimi said, quoting Saddam. "The president also asked his countrymen to 'unify in the face of sectarian strife.'''
In Tikrit, Saddam's hometown, 1,000 people defied the curfew and carried pictures of the city's favorite son through the streets. Some declared the court a product of the U.S. "occupation forces'' and condemned the verdict.
"By our souls, by our blood we sacrifice for you Saddam" and ``Saddam your name shakes America.''
U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad issued a statement saying the verdicts "demonstrate the commitment of the Iraqi people to hold them (Saddam and his co-defendants) accountable.''
"Although the Iraqis may face difficult days in the coming weeks, closing the book on Saddam and his regime is an opportunity to unite and build a better future," Khalilzad said.
U.S. officials associated with the tribunal said Saddam's repeated courtroom outbursts during the nine-month trial may have played a key part in his conviction.
They cited his admission in a March 1 hearing that he had ordered the trial of 148 Shiites who were eventually executed, insisting that doing so was legal because they were suspected in the assassination attempt against him. "Where is the crime? Where is the crime?" he asked, standing before the panel of five judges.
Later in the same session, he argued that his co-defendants must be released and that because he was in charge, he alone must be tried. His outburst came a day after the prosecution presented a presidential decree with a signature they said was Saddam's approval for death sentences for the 148 Shiites, their most direct evidence against him.
About 50 of those sentenced by the "Revolutionary Court" died during interrogation before they could go to the gallows. Some of those hanged were children.
"Every time they (defendants) rose and spoke, they provided a lot of incriminating evidence," said one of the U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.
Under Saddam, Iraq's bureaucracy showed a consistent tendency to document orders, policies and minutes of meetings. That, according to the U.S. officials, helped the prosecution produce more than 30 documents that clearly established the chain of command under Saddam.
One document gave the names of everyone from Dujail banished to a desert detention camp in southern Iraq. Another, prepared by an aide to Saddam, gave the president a detailed account of the punitive measures against the people of Dujail following the failed assassination attempt.
Saddam's trial had from the outset appeared to reflect the turmoil and violence in Iraq since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.
One of Saddam's lawyers was assassinated the day after the trial's opening session last year. Two more were later assassinated and a fourth fled the country.
In January, chief judge Rizgar Amin, a Kurd, resigned after complaints by Shiite politicians that he had failed to keep control of court proceedings. He, in turn, complained of political interference in the trial. Abdul-Rahman, another Kurd, replaced Amin.
Hearings were frequently disrupted by outbursts from Saddam and Ibrahim, with the two raging against what they said was the illegitimacy of the court, their ill treatment in the U.S.-run facility where they are being held and the lack of protection for their lawyers.
The defense lawyers contributed to the chaos in the courtroom by staging several boycotts.
|
source:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...id=968332188492
|
|
|
| Abercrombie |
o rly?
/good riddance |
|
|
| Ryster |
| This guy deserves everything he is about to get!!! |
|
|
| 7-4-7 |
| this will make Iraq a much scarier place. |
|
|
| Shaya007 |
no way!
:(
GOOD!
:tongue3 |
|
|
| DJMASTA_DON |
| Not only was he killing thousands of people but he was stealing money from all of us so I say KILL the bastard!:whip: |
|
|
| nusty |
personally Im against this whole thing. Can you honestly tell me that if someone attempted a plot to kill the President of the US that those responsible wouldnt disapear? its pretty much policy in most places that assination attempts dont get rewarded with life... esspecially in the middle east. Sadams retaliations are rather typicaly of the geographic area.
The fact that his lawyer (a former US attonery general) got thrown out the court room is a good sign (among MANY others!) that this case was decided before it even bagan. When it started the US stated that it was having problems finding "unbiased" people for the court... take that however you want but this whole thing has been an organized sham to save the US some face for destroying a country. I also liked how this article claimed that this has brought Iraq to the "brink" of civil war... clearly they have not been to a civil war recently to compare it to a real one. If they had Im sure they would not try to claim Iraq as being merely "troubled".
Im not saying Sadam is a good man by any means Im simply stating that the facts of this case do not justify the treatment of Iraq or the treatment of Saddam. I see this as another sad day for international law. |
|
|
| nusty |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJMASTA_DON
Not only was he killing thousands of people but he was stealing money from all of us so I say KILL the bastard!:whip: |
how was he stealing money from all of us? did he open your bank account and help himself? even then, thats hardly justification for a death sentence. |
|
|
| dEsidEL |
| quote: | Originally posted by nusty
personally Im against this whole thing. Can you honestly tell me that if someone attempted a plot to kill the President of the US that those responsible wouldnt disapear? its pretty much policy in most places that assination attempts dont get rewarded with life... esspecially in the middle east. Sadams retaliations are rather typicaly of the geographic area.
The fact that his lawyer (a former US attonery general) got thrown out the court room is a good sign (among MANY others!) that this case was decided before it even bagan. When it started the US stated that it was having problems finding "unbiased" people for the court... take that however you want but this whole thing has been an organized sham to save the US some face for destroying a country. I also liked how this article claimed that this has brought Iraq to the "brink" of civil war... clearly they have not been to a civil war recently to compare it to a real one. If they had Im sure they would not try to claim Iraq as being merely "troubled".
Im not saying Sadam is a good man by any means Im simply stating that the facts of this case do not justify the treatment of Iraq or the treatment of Saddam. I see this as another sad day for international law. |
true... but i can't honestly say that this came as any surprise, you pretty much knew he was gonna get the axe one way or another..
|
|
|
| smuncky |
| quote: | Originally posted by nusty
how was he stealing money from all of us? did he open your bank account and help himself? even then, thats hardly justification for a death sentence. |
he sent me one of those emails saying he was a nigerian prince and he wanted to give me $17 million if i deposited 10,000 into his account first. :whip: |
|
|
| nusty |
| quote: | Originally posted by dEsidEL
true... but i can't honestly say that this came as any surprise, you pretty much knew he was gonna get the axe one way or another..
|
I know but I was hopefull that since it was in the international spot light that it would function better than it did. Im also not impressed with the total media black out of the court room (unless the US wanted the news from that day released for positive press). We don't even do that in the US. If the US was running the court then they should have adhered to strict international law protocol to make a good example for the world. Instead the US now comes out with the image of being a bigger international terrorist than saddam ever was! Is someone going to hang Bush for all of the civilians that have died by the guns of his miliary play toy since this war started? Not likely, even though much more civilians have died by his guns than ever by Saddam. |
|
|
| dEsidEL |
| quote: | Originally posted by nusty
I know but I was hopefull that since it was in the international spot light that it would function better than it did. Im also not impressed with the total media black out of the court room (unless the US wanted the news from that day released for positive press). We don't even do that in the US. If the US was running the court then they should have adhered to strict international law protocol to make a good example for the world. Instead the US now comes out with the image of being a bigger international terrorist than saddam ever was! Is someone going to hang Bush for all of the civilians that have died by the guns of his miliary play toy since this war started? Not likely, even though much more civilians have died by his guns than ever by Saddam. |
i too am an idealist.. but in this troubled world, sometimes it's hard.. lol i wonder if it was sheer co-incidence that the verdict was handed down 2 days before the midterm elections..
here's an interesting video of the verdict reading:
http://dynamic.cnn.com/apps/tp/vide...%26-%26-%26-%26
(open in media player.. there's a short election clip at the beginning so just ignore that)
|
|
|
|
|
