|
SOFTWARE vs. HARDWARE (Strength's & Weakness - Your opinion is welcome!) (pg. 20)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by orTofønChiLd
This whole a/b test wasn't dealing with waveforms at all they were signals |
Once again, a waveform is the amplitude of a signal over time. Signals and their waveforms are THE SAME ING THING.
You know what, I'm done with you, you're obviously either 12 years old or trolling. |
|
|
| orTofønChiLd |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Once again, a waveform is the amplitude of a signal over time. Signals and their waveforms are THE SAME ING THING.
You know what, I'm done with you, you're obviously either 12 years old or trolling. |
you explaining to me wut a waveform is, is a newb trying to explain wut a trainwreck is. a waveform is the easiest term ever. how could you not know wut it is. you copied and paste that from wiki |
|
|
| cronodevir |
Now diginut..everyone knows a saw isn't made of sines, its made of saws der :D :toothless
Sqaure waves are made when you take a square and multiply it by the frequencies :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| orTofønChiLd |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
A waveform is the amplitude of a signal over time. To talk about it in qualitative terms, i.e. "improving" it, is completely ridiculous.
Modulating a signal with an LFO changes the signal. Assuming it's an audio signal, whether or not that "improves" the actual sound is an entirely subjective judgment and depends on what the actual modulation was.
You really can't make many interesting sounds without envelopes and LFOs. |
thats not what you said before. We're judging the characteristics of a synthesizer's basic saw init sound not its lfo's.
and a waveform is the visual display of a signal |
|
|
| spolitta |
| quote: | Originally posted by orTofønChiLd
This whole a/b test wasn't dealing with waveforms at all they were signals :rolleyes: |
 |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Also check out what he says here. |
:haha: Good technique!
He must be a kid - I've just been though some other posts he's made and he really doesn't have a clue.
May I add:
 |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
 |
|
|
| orTofønChiLd |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
:haha: Good technique!
He must be a kid - I've just been though some other posts he's made and he really doesn't have a clue.
May I add:
|
you take that irish prick and shuv it up your arse |
|
|
| DJ RANN |
| quote: | Originally posted by orTofønChiLd
you take that irish prick and shuv it up your arse |
now, now, no need to get ty because everyone is on to you. :haha: |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| quote: | Originally posted by orTofønChiLd
and a waveform is the visual display of a signal |
On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate the accuracy of your definition a -1.
A waveform does not need to be printed out on a screen in order to exist, and a spectral analysis is also a visual representation of a signal, but is obviously not a waveform.
You've managed to come up with a definition that is both too restrictive AND too broad. Well done, troll. |
|
|
| DigiNut |
| P.S. Nice reference Eddie, this debate really is mutually assured destruction. |
|
|
| orTofønChiLd |
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate the accuracy of your definition a -1.
A waveform does not need to be printed out on a screen in order to exist, and a spectral analysis is also a visual representation of a signal, but is obviously not a waveform.
You've managed to come up with a definition that is both too restrictive AND too broad. Well done, troll. |
so your saying after all this you can achieve the same results from a analogue synthesizer using a softsynth lfo modulation style? |
|
|
|
|
