return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Music Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 
Daft Punk's new album (pg. 6)
View this Thread in Original format
SYSTEM-J
So to fulfill the requirements of music made by "actual bands" doing it better now, you posted a Prodigy track. From 1994.
DjWoody
I guess DP did sampled music on RAM.


Contact...



:toothless


srussell0018
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
thats fine. LIke what you want. This is about me. I mean you are the same as say those that think hanz zimmer does great classical music.


Not really.
LoveHate
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
i mean how can you say listen to



and then listen to daft punk's attempt and not wonder what the happened to music. I mean everything is just really really vanilla. The bass and drums were obviously recorded at different times because they just don't ing work. I think that is probably the reason it sounds so cold. They had great players but not together and daft punk aren't exactly known for their arranging. The album could actually been really good. They just needed someone to give them some help.


you cant expect two guys from france to make the same type of music from an era that they were never a part of mad for brad, just enjoy it for what it is, a good decent ode.
Looney4Clooney
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
So to fulfill the requirements of music made by "actual bands" doing it better now, you posted a Prodigy track. From 1994.


how is this relevant ? I mean what is your ing deal .
Looney4Clooney
quote:
Originally posted by LoveHate
you cant expect two guys from france to make the same type of music from an era that they were never a part of mad for brad, just enjoy it for what it is, a good decent ode.


but that is the point. I mean lets say you had the kareoke versions of your favourite tracks, would you listen to them or the original. This is like those guys making melodic trance in like 2009. I mean casette does this very stuff and it sounds a million times better. This whole italdisco revival isn't exactly new and as redundant as they might be, you would kinda exepct a little more from a duo with some financial backing and some actual fantastic musicians. Even the mix is just horrid. And they talk about using tape. IT literally sounds like it was mixed by the assistant on a computer. If anyone else released this album, people would not have anything , good or bad , to say about it. I mean i think it would be licensed by dentists for their lobby but ya....
Juan Paulino
Everyone keep pwning L4C. :stongue:
idoru
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
This is about me.


Welp, that seems to explain this whole thread. "Me, me, me!"

Let's all move on now and stop stroking L4C's cock.
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
how is this relevant ? I mean what is your ing deal .


Aside from the explanation I've already given, it's just jolly good fun to make you look stupid.
srussell0018
Tell us again, musically speaking, why this album is bad. I'm about to cum.

Rodri Santos
i have to listen to this album seeing all the fuzz, their marketing scheme has worked with me. Although i'm 90% sure i won't like it, never liked DP so this controversial hipster album probably won't either.
srussell0018
How is it controversial? The vast majority of early reviews of it are good. It's just cunts like l4c or people who are just looking for electronic 4x4 music who have problems with it.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 
Privacy Statement