|
Death to all humans and Earth (pg. 25)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by DjShlian
u stole ur ideas from agent smith on matrix. eminem would so kick ur butt |
this ideology is has been around way before 1999, when that film came out |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by DjArTiN!
Why don't you just go and commit suicide or something. Make our lives easier. Why don't you try to make this world better instead of bashing it? No one on this earth would trade places with you. You have a sick mind. You've probably have had a bad experience with people because you're not sociable. You're probably stuck in this small dark room and have never stepped out and tried to communicate with people.
ban this guy, on behalf of everyone on tranceaddict.:cool: |
This world would be better without our species. Understand that little boy |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
This world would be better without our species. Understand that little boy |
Better for whom?... I'm looking for something more specific than "the planet". |
|
|
| Dervish |
What are the chances of life occuring again in thouse conditions (after an asteroid)? What do you think would arise that is better than what is now from that? You really like craters or something?
The climate would chance, every other species would be destroyed, plants would die due to lack of light from the dust, fish would die as planton die off because of the cooler waters.
Nothing would grow afterwards.
Chances of new life on earth would be remote, perhaps even on an infinate timeline.
Enjoy your rock..... like there aren't many of them around.
In the big scheme our rock is nothing, we could actually blow it into nothing and it wouldn't matter. I think you place to much importance on this particular piece of rock.
There is only one thing special about our rock, life. And you want to take that away?
Big statement........ little thought. |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
What are the chances of life occuring again in thouse conditions (after an asteroid)? What do you think would arise that is better than what is now from that? You really like craters or something?
The climate would chance, every other species would be destroyed, plants would die due to lack of light from the dust, fish would die as planton die off because of the cooler waters.
Nothing would grow afterwards.
Chances of new life on earth would be remote, perhaps even on an infinate timeline.
Enjoy your rock..... like there aren't many of them around.
In the big scheme our rock is nothing, we could actually blow it into nothing and it wouldn't matter. I think you place to much importance on this particular piece of rock.
There is only one thing special about our rock, life. And you want to take that away?
Big statement........ little thought. |
But the bacteria would be having a ball! j.k. :D |
|
|
| jrbuddha |
| quote: | Originally posted by LeopoldStotch
i am sorry, but i actually agree with this guy ..
but instead of an asteroid, i rather have another 'Ice Age' effect to come ..
the world needs to start over from the beginning.. |
http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/wo...TbBP-2fa91M.asp
| quote: | | "Instead of driving us to the brink of environmental disaster, human intervention and technology progress will be seen as vital activities that have unintentionally delayed the onset of a catastrophic ice age." |
LOL |
|
|
| milanster |
wow...Im not gonna go thru all 25 pages of this thread..but there ya go...u can start here :
http://www.vhemt.org/ :p |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
Better for whom?... I'm looking for something more specific than "the planet". |
why does it have to be better for a "whom"? |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
why does it have to be better for a "whom"? |
"Better" implies judgement based on specific predetermined definitions of "good" and "bad". Such value judgements can only be made by beings capable of higher thought. As soon as such entities cease to exist "better" and "worse" do not exist. We create these concepts, give them meaning and create signifiers for them thus maintaining their existance. Without us they slip back into nothing.
If your point is that humans are pretty pathetic as a species I would be inclined to agree. But if you really are saying that something would be better without them, I find it hard to follow conceptually. |
|
|
| Dervish |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
why does it have to be better for a "whom"? |
Then what would be the point?
I fail to see what a big deal we are making. This is a very small rock.
Like I said, big statement, little thought. |
|
|
| Chris T. Dot |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
let me be more specific to you all.. this planet would actually be better off without the human race. The animals should live... not us. |
Well, if you feel that strongly, go kill urself and u'll be helping ur own cause. You sound like a nut, a little too extreme when it comes to some issues. |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
"Better" implies judgement based on specific predetermined definitions of "good" and "bad". Such value judgements can only be made by beings capable of higher thought. As soon as such entities cease to exist "better" and "worse" do not exist. We create these concepts, give them meaning and create signifiers for them thus maintaining their existance. Without us they slip back into nothing.
If your point is that humans are pretty pathetic as a species I would be inclined to agree. But if you really are saying that something would be better without them, I find it hard to follow conceptually.
|
If there was another species that was conducting the same atrocieties we are to the planet, and they had no concept of what is right or wrong, good or bad, and didnt define it, they are still dispicable. |
|
|
|
|
