|
Death to all humans and Earth (pg. 27)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| OurManFlint |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Who farted?
Man, I've been asking this question a lot lately...maybe it's me?
:conf: |
Girls don't fart.... |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
No pollution = good for the earth
No wars= good for the earth
No humans= good for the earth as well |
Hold on, didn't the thread title say "death to all humans and earth"?
Secondly, "good" is defined by humans. Without humans there is no "good" or "bad"
Thirdly Earth is an inanimate object. It is a large rock with no mind, no self-awareness and it does not give a whether something is good for it or bad for it. |
|
|
| biznology |
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
Hold on, didn't the thread title say "death to all humans and earth"?
Secondly, "good" is defined by humans. Without humans there is no "good" or "bad"
Thirdly Earth is an inanimate object. It is a large rock with no mind, no self-awareness and it does not give a whether something is good for it or bad for it. |
plus if everything was dead? what would (and how?) would Cyrus find something to bitch about?
the internet is ing wonderful isnt it kids?! |
|
|
| Chris T. Dot |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
You may see this as an extremity, which i admit it is, but that doesnt make it ridiculous. We have made this world far worse than it was. We have caused death and destruction of the earth by taking advantage of her resources for our own selfish consumption. Can you tell me what is amazing about this world we live in??? The nature of it is to take from others in order to satisfy ourselves.
OUr eradication is needed. We are harmful to life and this planet. |
First, you admit it's extreme. Then you don't answer my question on whether you would press a button to do your will because it would obviously make you look bad, and then you just repeat your rhetoric on how human eradication is needed yet if someone tells you to do it do yourself, you obviously won't follow your own advice because like most people, you want to preserve your own life. You have just proven yourself illogical and no wonder no one here takes you seriously, because they don't have a reason to.
What's so amazing about this world we live in? How about friends, how about learning about life, about the secrets that this world has to offer, about community and connection with others, about experiences with others that make our lives awesome. There are TONS of things that make this world awesome, and those things outnumber the bad by far, that's why we still live on this planet Cyrus. And the last time I checked, we're still the best planet in this universe. Our world has so much positive to offer, so much beauty to explore and find. How about you stop complaining and being so negative and go explore and travel this wonderful world and actually see what's the good that it has to offer. Not every society is consumption and greed based. You believe you are openminded but I don't believe that for a second, you haven't gone out and explored this world and seen just how awesome it is. Stay off your computer and do that first. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
No pollution = good for the earth
No wars= good for the earth |
Entropy is an inevitability. You would deny this because your mother stopped breastfeeding you too early or are you just continuing your "stance" for the sake of idiotic conjecture? |
|
|
| Dervish |
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King
No pollution = good for the earth
No wars= good for the earth
No humans= good for the earth as well |
but.....
| quote: | Originally posted by Cyrus King Wouldnt it be so lovely if a large asteroid plunged into earth and vaporized our disgusting species? I hope it happens in our lifetime....this would be the best thing ever.
The human race deserves death. |
large asteroid = no good for earth :gsmile:
But since I take it you mean to selectively remove the human race and leave the rest untouched.
Do you have any idea how much polution come out of a cows ass in the form of methane? How is that ok... that cow polutes...? (I'm making a serious point actually stay with me... :gsmile: )
If you mean to the extent of climate change. Then yes we are changing the climate. But it always has changed, not so quickly before and we are possibly heading for tough times. But if we manage to get more nations on board with the various polution restriction comitments we can change it.
Obviously the world is not going to be same with us on it. But it wouldn't be the same with any other form of life(animal or plant). And how can you state which form is better or worse (unless you want none?)?
To me most animals are just compliacted objects. We are too basicly. A reaction to our inputs, nothing but a result as is everything we do.
So basicly I still don't understand as someone else said "better for who?". Unless you mean other animals? But it's a big judgement to say we should die for them. Even just be sterilised for them (no death involved :gsmile: <<< if you said that I bet more people would have sided with you). |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
Hold on, didn't the thread title say "death to all humans and earth"?
Secondly, "good" is defined by humans. Without humans there is no "good" or "bad"
Thirdly Earth is an inanimate object. It is a large rock with no mind, no self-awareness and it does not give a whether something is good for it or bad for it. |
First of.. i was all heated up when i made the thread and mentioned earth should explode in order to remove us. But I take taht back.. earth should survive. Humans shouldnt. And to many, earth is a LIVING object, its a live planet unlike mars or jupiter.
Plants dont have minds or awarness either. Some people dont as well.. does that mean they arent alive? |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Entropy is an inevitability. You would deny this because your mother stopped breastfeeding you too early or are you just continuing your "stance" for the sake of idiotic conjecture? |
wow you are so intelligent! |
|
|
| Cyrus King |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
but.....
large asteroid = no good for earth :gsmile:
But since I take it you mean to selectively remove the human race and leave the rest untouched.
Do you have any idea how much polution come out of a cows ass in the form of methane? How is that ok... that cow polutes...? (I'm making a serious point actually stay with me... :gsmile: )
If you mean to the extent of climate change. Then yes we are changing the climate. But it always has changed, not so quickly before and we are possibly heading for tough times. But if we manage to get more nations on board with the various polution restriction comitments we can change it.
Obviously the world is not going to be same with us on it. But it wouldn't be the same with any other form of life(animal or plant). And how can you state which form is better or worse (unless you want none?)?
To me most animals are just compliacted objects. We are too basicly. A reaction to our inputs, nothing but a result as is everything we do.
So basicly I still don't understand as someone else said "better for who?". Unless you mean other animals? But it's a big judgement to say we should die for them. Even just be sterilised for them (no death involved :gsmile: <<< if you said that I bet more people would have sided with you). |
I was being sensational in my first post.lol i was being over dramatic. But the general purpose that i was getting at was that our species needs to be removed some how.
ITs not better for "WHO" its better for the whole earth as a sustainable habitat for the species she helped subsist for billions of years. Our speicies has only existed for 3 million years compared to the earths 4 billion year existance. We have done an unprecedented amount of damage not only to ourselves but to the earth as well.
Within the last thousand years....we as a species have caused more damage and destruction and frivilous consumption than any other beings on this earth. 1000 years...thats it! That isnt even a millisecond of history compared to the earths age. I wonder how long it will take you guys to realize how destructive and menacing our species is. |
|
|
| smokeape |
| quote: | Originally posted by smokeape
It would be far better for all of us if the asteroid actually landed on your head and killed only you by planting your sorry ass about 100 feet under.
:p
[[[smoke]]]
|
Hate to repeat threads, but when a poster like Cyrus has such a thick skull, it becomes necessary.
Cyrus, Take a hint and delete the thread or continue posting like an absolute imbecile which you've done up until this point, and further prove to us all how stupid you really are.
;)
[[[smoke]]] |
|
|
| Chris T. Dot |
| And don't ignore my posts Cyrus. I asked you valid questions and made well thought out comments. Answer them because you're turning out to look like a raging lunatic who can't defend his statements. |
|
|
| Dervish |
| I understand we have changed/destroyed alot and are going to go on doing that. But we are just another animal, we can't help it. Unless as I think we should know better. In which case we are slightly better than the average animal and as such should be preserved. Though I totally agree we should change our ways. ( It's just that once you have "development", i.e. cars heating and so on, you can put it back in the box, and as China and India develop there is going to be more and pressure ) |
|
|
|
|
